高级检索+

黄河中游湿地植物分类学多样性研究

李帅, 张婕, 上官铁梁, 郭东罡

李帅, 张婕, 上官铁梁, 郭东罡. 黄河中游湿地植物分类学多样性研究[J]. 植物科学学报, 2015, 33(6): 775-783. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2015.60775
引用本文: 李帅, 张婕, 上官铁梁, 郭东罡. 黄河中游湿地植物分类学多样性研究[J]. 植物科学学报, 2015, 33(6): 775-783. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2015.60775
LI Shuai, ZHANG Jie, SHANGGUAN Tie-Liang, GUO Dong-Gang. Wetland Plant Taxonomic Diversity in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2015, 33(6): 775-783. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2015.60775
Citation: LI Shuai, ZHANG Jie, SHANGGUAN Tie-Liang, GUO Dong-Gang. Wetland Plant Taxonomic Diversity in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2015, 33(6): 775-783. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2015.60775
李帅, 张婕, 上官铁梁, 郭东罡. 黄河中游湿地植物分类学多样性研究[J]. 植物科学学报, 2015, 33(6): 775-783. CSTR: 32231.14.PSJ.2095-0837.2015.60775
引用本文: 李帅, 张婕, 上官铁梁, 郭东罡. 黄河中游湿地植物分类学多样性研究[J]. 植物科学学报, 2015, 33(6): 775-783. CSTR: 32231.14.PSJ.2095-0837.2015.60775
LI Shuai, ZHANG Jie, SHANGGUAN Tie-Liang, GUO Dong-Gang. Wetland Plant Taxonomic Diversity in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2015, 33(6): 775-783. CSTR: 32231.14.PSJ.2095-0837.2015.60775
Citation: LI Shuai, ZHANG Jie, SHANGGUAN Tie-Liang, GUO Dong-Gang. Wetland Plant Taxonomic Diversity in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2015, 33(6): 775-783. CSTR: 32231.14.PSJ.2095-0837.2015.60775

黄河中游湿地植物分类学多样性研究

基金项目: 山西省基础研究计划项目(2014021032-3)。
详细信息
    作者简介:

    李帅(1989-),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为环境生物学(E-mail:413160609@qq.com).

  • 中图分类号: Q948

Wetland Plant Taxonomic Diversity in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River

  • 摘要: 在黄河中游湿地自禹门口至汾河入河口之间设置了13个样地进行植物调查,并将植物物种系统分类学中的分类学差异性指数应用到研究区域物种多样性的测度中。结果显示,样地内共记录植物75种,隶属于2门3纲18目23科61属;按所含物种数的多少统计,在门水平上主要分布在被子植物门(73种),在纲水平上主要分布在双子叶植物纲(57种),在科水平上主要集中在豆科(Leguminosae,11种)、菊科(Compositae,14种)和禾本科(Gramineae,11种),在属水平上主要集中在藜属(Chenopodium,3种)、胡枝子属(Lespedeza,3种)、蒿属(Artemisia,3种)和香蒲属(Typha,3种);一年或两年生植物最多,地上芽植物、地面芽植物和地下芽植物次之的生活型谱特征总体上反映了黄河中游湿地夏季高温多雨、冬季寒冷干旱的气候特征。用平均分类学差异指数(Δ + )和分类学差异变异指数(Λ + )对13个样地植物分类学多样性特征的分析表明,Δ + 和 Λ + 的理论平均值分别为84.25和425.43;运用双变量分析法将Δ + 和 Λ + 进行组合分析,发现汾河入河口样地(S12)的期望值较小,河津市汾河25号坝样地(S8)、闸西侧样地(S9)和万荣县西范控导工程西侧样地(S10)的期望值较大,说明样地S12的物种分类学多样性较大且物种分布较为均一,样地S8、S9、S10则与之相反。Pearson检验结果显示,平均分类学差异指数(Δ + )、分类学差异变异指数(Λ + )与Shannon-Wiener指数、Pielou指数、Simpson指数、Patrick指数间均无稳定的相关关系(P > 0.05)。
    Abstract: Thirteen typical wetland sites located between Yumenkou and the Fenhe River estuary in the middle reaches of the Yellow River were investigated, with the taxonomic index used to measure species diversity. Results showed that a total of 75 species, belonging to 61 genera, 23 families, 18 orders, three classes and two phyla were recorded from the 13 sites. At the phylum level, 73 species were mainly distributed in Angiospermae. At the class level, 57 species were mainly distributed in Dicotyledons. At the family level, 36 species were mainly distributed in Leguminosae, Compositae and Gramineae. At the genus level, 12 species were mainly distributed in Chenopodium, Lespedeza, Artemisi and Typha. Annual or biennial plants were the most abundant, closely followed by chamaephytes, hemicryptophytes and geophytes, and the life-form spectra reflected the hot rainy summers and cold dry winters of the middle reaches of the Yellow River. Plant species diversity was studied using average taxonomic distinctness (Δ + ) and variation in taxonomic distinctness (Λ + ), and the expected values of Δ + and Λ + were 84.25 and 425.43, respectively. Using bivariate analysis to evaluate Δ + and Λ + together showed that the expected value of plot S12 located at the Fenhe River estuary was the lowest, while the expected values of plots S8, S9 and S10 were higher, showing that the taxonomic diversity index of species was larger and the distribution of species was more uniform in S12 than that found in S8, S9 and S10. Pearson's test results showed that Δ + + and the Shannon-Wiener, Pielou, Simpson and Patrick indices were not correlated (P > 0.05).
  • [1] Clarke KR, Warwick RM. The taxonomic distinctness measure of biodiversity: weighting of step lengths between hierarchical levels[J]. Mar Ecol Prog Ser, 1999, 184(3): 21-29.
    [2] 李景文, 李俊清. 森林生物多样性保护研究[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2006: 34-78.
    [3] 李景文, 李俊清, 任艳林. 海南主要热带森林生态系统类型自然保护区物种分类多样性研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2002, 6(Z1): 108-114.
    [4] Magurran AE. 生物多样性测度[M]. 张峰,译. 北京: 科学出版社, 2011: 66-105.
    [5] 徐宾铎, 金显仕, 梁振林. 黄海鱼类群落分类学多样性的研究[J]. 中国海洋大学学报: 自然科学版, 2005, 35(4): 629-634.
    [6] Clarke KR, Warwick RM. A taxonomic distinctness index and its statistical properties[J]. J Appl Ecol, 1998, 35(4): 523-531.
    [7] Clarke KR, Warwick RM. A further biodiversity index applicable to species list: variation in taxonomic distinctness[J]. Mar Ecol Prog Ser,2001, 216(2): 265-278.
    [8] 彭松耀. 黄东海大型底栖动物群落结构特征[D]. 青岛: 中国科学院研究生院海洋研究所, 2013.
    [9] Moreno CE, Castillo-Campos G, Verdú JR. Taxonomic diversity as complementary information to assess plant species diversity in secondary vegetation and primary tropical deciduous forest[J]. J Veg Sci, 2009, 20(5): 935-943.
    [10] 秦晓娟, 董刚, 邓永利, 毛空, 李旭华, 张峰. 山西平陆黄河湿地植物分类学多样性[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(2): 409-415.
    [11] 樊杰, 宋伯为, 上官铁梁. 黄河中游禹门口--桃花峪河漫滩种子植物区系地理研究[J]. 武汉植物学研究, 2003, 21(4): 332-338.
    [12] 上官铁梁, 宋伯为, 朱军, 张平. 黄河中游湿地资源及可持续利用研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2005, 19(1): 7-13.
    [13] 张婕. 黄河中游连伯滩湿地景观格局变化研究[D]. 太原: 山西大学, 2009.
    [14] 郭东罡, 上官铁梁, 白中科, 张婕, 邵宏波. 黄河中游连伯滩湿地景观格局变化[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(18): 5192-5198.
    [15] 李博, 杨持, 林鹏. 生态学[M] . 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000: 117-122.
    [16] 曾燏. 嘉陵江干流鱼类物种分类多样性研究[J]. 西华师范大学学报, 2012, 33(3): 246-260.
    [17] 徐宾铎, 金显仕, 梁振林. 对黄、渤海鱼类等级多样性的推算[J]. 中国海洋大学学报: 自然科学版, 2005, 35(1): 25-28.
    [18] Purvis A, Hector A. Getting the measure of biodiversity[J]. Nature, 2000, 405(6783): 212-219.
    [19] Warwick RM, Clarke KR. New biodiversity mea-sures reveal a decrease in taxonomic distinctness with increasing stress[J]. Mar Ecol Prog Ser, 1995, 129(1-3): 301-305.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1517
  • HTML全文浏览量:  1
  • PDF下载量:  1643
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-07-11
  • 发布日期:  2015-12-27

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回