中亚热带樟科3种植物幼苗叶结构型性状的种间差异及其相关性

李超; 赵广东; 王兵; 史作民; 邓宗富; 夏晨; 陈和东

doi:10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2016.10027

中亚热带樟科3种植物幼苗叶结构型性状的种间差异及其相关性

1. 中国林业科学研究院, 森林生态环境与保护研究所, 国家林业局森林生态环境重点实验室, 北京 100091;
2. 中国林业科学研究院, 亚热带林业实验中心, 江西分宜 336600

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目(31170306,30870193, 31290223).

详细信息

作者简介:
李超(1989-),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为植物生理生态学(E-mail:lichaoneil@163.com).

通讯作者:
赵广东,E-mail:zhaogdcaf@126.com

中图分类号: Q948
计量
- 文章访问数: 915
- HTML全文浏览量: 3
- PDF下载量: 1300
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2015-07-18
- 网络出版日期: 2022-10-31
- 发布日期: 2016-02-27

Interspecific Differences and Correlation among Leaf Structural Traits of Three Plant Seedlings of Lauraceae in the Mid-Subtropical Zone of China

1. Key Lab of Forest Ecology and Environment, State Forestry Administration, Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China;
2. Experimental Center of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Fenyi, Jiangxi 336600, China

Funds:

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31170306, 30870193, 31290223).

摘要

摘要: 为了揭示植物叶功能性状对全球气候变化的响应和适应规律,以樟科3种植物幼苗为研究对象,将其人工采集的种子经低温沙藏并于温室培育,然后将幼苗移栽到野外同质园中自然生长,研究中亚热带樟科植物刨花楠(Machilus pauhoi)、香樟(Cinnamomum camphora)和闽楠(Phoebe bournei)两年生幼苗生长季节9种叶结构型性状的种间差异及其相关性.结果显示,(1)在3种植物幼苗中,香樟叶面积、叶厚度、叶体积、叶氮磷比最大,叶氮浓度最高,叶组织密度最小;闽楠叶组织密度、叶干物质含量最大,叶磷浓度最高,叶面积、叶体积、比叶面积、叶氮磷比最小,叶氮浓度最低;刨花楠比叶面积最大,叶厚度、叶干物质含量最小,叶磷浓度最低;3种植物幼苗的叶厚度之间均无显著差异.(2)Pearson相关分析和线性回归分析结果表明,樟科3种植物幼苗的叶面积与叶体积间呈极显著正相关(P < 0.01)、与叶干物质含量间呈极显著负相关(P < 0.01)、与叶磷浓度间呈极显著负相关(P < 0.01)、与叶组织密度间呈显著负相关(P < 0.05)、与叶氮浓度间呈显著正相关(P < 0.05);叶厚度与比叶面积间呈显著负相关(P < 0.05)、与叶干物质含量间呈显著正相关(P < 0.05);叶体积与叶组织密度间呈极显著负相关(P < 0.01)、与叶氮浓度间呈极显著正相关(P < 0.01)、与叶磷浓度间呈显著负相关(P < 0.05);叶组织密度与叶磷浓度间呈显著正相关(P < 0.05);比叶面积与叶干物质含量间呈极显著负相关(P < 0.01)、与叶磷浓度间呈极显著负相关(P < 0.01);叶干物质含量与叶磷浓度间呈极显著正相关(P < 0.01).这表明在同质园中生长的刨花楠、香樟和闽楠幼苗的9种叶结构型性状表现出一定的种间差异,不同物种同一叶结构型性状指标的大小顺序、种间差异及其显著性不同;3种植物幼苗不同叶结构型性状之间的相关性及其显著程度也不同.本研究结果为揭示樟科3种植物幼苗叶功能性状对全球气候变化的响应和适应规律提供了基础数据.
- 樟科 /
- 植物幼苗 /
- 叶结构型性状 /
- 种间差异 /
- 相关关系
Abstract: Following manual collection of seeds stored in sand under low temperature and then cultivated in greenhouse, Machilus pauhoi,Cinnamomum camphora and Phoebe bournei (Lauraceae) seedlings from the mid-subtropical zone of China were transplanted to the common garden in the Jiangxi Dagangshan Forest Ecosystem Research Station.Interspecific differences and correlations in leaf size, leaf thickness, leaf volume, leaf tissue density, specific leaf area, leaf dry matter content, leaf nitrogen concentration, leaf phosphorus concentration, and ratio of nitrogen and phosphorus concentration of two-year old seedlings in the growing season were investigated to provide basic data and scientific reference material on the responses of the leaf functional traits to global climate change.Results showed that: (1) Among the three plant seedlings, leaf size, leaf thickness, leaf volume, leaf nitrogen content and ratio of leaf nitrogen and phosphorus concentration were highest in C.camphora, and leaf tissue density was lowest.Leaf tissue density, leaf dry matter content and leaf phosphorus concentration were highest in P.bournei,while leaf size, leaf volume, specific leaf size, ratio of leaf nitrogen and phosphorus concentration, and leaf nitrogen content were lowest.Specific leaf area was highest in M.pauhoi, while leaf thickness, leaf dry matter content, and leaf phosphorus concentration were lowest.Leaf thickness of the three plant seedling species showed no significant differences; (2) Pearson and line regression analyses indicated that leaf size showed highly significant positive correlation with leaf volume (P < 0.01), and highly significant negative correlation with leaf dry matter content and leaf phosphorus concentration (P < 0.01).The correlations between leaf size and leaf tissue density and leaf nitrogen concentration were significantly negative and positive, respectively (P < 0.05).The correlations between leaf thickness and specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content were significantly negative and positive, respectively (P < 0.05).The correlations between leaf volume and leaf tissue density and leaf nitrogen concentration were highly significantly negative and positive, respectively (P < 0.01).Leaf volume also showed significant negative correlation with leaf phosphorus concentration (P < 0.05).Leaf tissue density showed significant positive correlation with leaf phosphorus concentration (P < 0.05).Specific leaf area exhibited highly significant positive correlation with leaf dry matter content and leaf phosphorus concentration, respectively (P < 0.01).Leaf dry matter content showed highly significant positive correlation with leaf phosphorus concentration (P < 0.01).The nine leaf structural traits of the three plant seedlings of Lauraceae exhibited certain interspecific differences, but the order and significance were different.Furthermore, the correlations and significance of the nine leaf structural traits of the three plant seedlings were different.
- Lauraceae /
- Plant seedlings /
- Leaf structural traits /
- Interspecific differences /
- Correlation

HTML全文

参考文献(58)

[1]	Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Díaz S, Garnier E, Lavorel S, Poorter H, Jaureguiberry P, Bret-Harte MS, Cornwell WK, Craine JM, Gurvich DE, Urcelay C, Veneklaas EJ, Reich PB, Poorter L, Wright IJ, Ray P, Enrico L, Pausas JG, Vos AC, Buchmann N, Funes G, Quétier F, Hodgson JG, Thompson K, Morgan HD, Steege H, Heijden MGA, Sack L, Blonder B, Poschlod P, Vaieretti MV, Conti G, Staver AC, Aquino S, Cornelissen JHC.New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide[J].Aust J Bot, 2013, 61(3):167-234.
[2]	Clark DL, Wilson M, Roberts R.Plant traits-a tool for restoration?[J].Appl Veg Sci, 2012, 15(4):449-458.
[3]	Cornelissen JHC, Lavorel S, Garnier E, Diaz S, Buchmann N, Gurvich DE.A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide[J].Aust J Bot, 2003, 51(4):335-380.
[4]	丁凌子, 陈亚军, 张教林.热带雨林木质藤本植物叶片性状及其关联[J].植物科学学报, 2014, 32(4): 362-370. Ding LZ, Chen YJ, Zhang JL.Leaf traits and their associations among liana species in tropical rainforest[J].Plant Science Journal, 2014, 32(4): 362-370.
[5]	陈洁, 李玉双, 庞莉莉, 王庆亚.江苏不同居群狗尾草叶片解剖特征的比较研究[J].植物科学学报, 2015, 33(4): 448-457. Chen J, Li YS, Pang LL, Wang QY.Comparative studies on leaf anatomical characteristics of Setaria viridis in different populations in Jiangsu[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2015, 33(4): 448-457.
[6]	Westoby M.A leaf-height-seed(LHS) plant ecology stra-tegy scheme[J].Plant Soil, 1998, 199(2):213-227.
[7]	张林, 罗天祥.植物叶寿命及其相关叶性状的生态学研究进展[J].植物生态学报, 2004, 28(6): 844-852. Zhang L, Luo TX.Advances in ecological studies on leaf lifespan and associated leaf traits[J].Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2004, 28(6): 844-852.
[8]	刘金环, 曾德慧, Don Koo Lee.科尔沁沙地东南部地区主要植物叶片性状及其相互关系[J].生态学杂志, 2006, 25(8): 921-925. Liu JH, Zeng DH, Don Koo Lee.Leaf traits and their interrelationships of main plant species in southeast Horqin sandy land[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2006, 25(8): 921-925.
[9]	黄文娟, 李志军, 杨赵平, 白冠章.胡杨异形叶结构型性状及其相互关系[J].生态学报, 2010, 30(17): 4636-4642. Huang WJ, Li ZJ, Yang ZP, Bai GZ.The structural traits of Populus euphratica heteromorphic leaves and their correlations[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(17): 4636-4642.
[10]	Werff H VD, Richter HG.Toward an improved classification of Lauraceae[J].Ann Mo Bot Gard, 1996, 83(3):409-418.
[11]	李捷, 李锡文.世界樟科植物系统学研究进展[J].云南植物研究, 2004, 26(1): 1-11. Li J, Li XW.Advances in Lauraceae systematic research on the world scale[J].Acta Botanica Yunnanica, 2004, 26(1):1-11.
[12]	Swamy V, Terborgh J, Dexter K G, Best BD, Alvarez P, Cornejo F.Are all seeds equal? Spatially explicit comparisons of seed fall and sapling recruitment in a tropical forest[J].Ecol Lett, 2011, 14(2):195-201.
[13]	陈圣宾, 宋爱琴, 李振基.森林幼苗更新对光环境异质性的响应研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2005, 16(2):365-370. Chen SB,Song AQ,Li ZJ.Research advance in response of forest seedling regeneration to light environme-ntal heterogeneity[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2005, 16(2): 365-370.
[14]	韩有志.林分空间异质性与水曲柳的更新格局和过程[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2002. Han YZ.Spatial heterogeneity and pattern and process of manchurian ash (Fraxinus mandshurica Rupr.) regeneration[D].Harbin:Northeast Forestry University,2002.
[15]	Clark DB, Clark DA.Seedling dynamics of a tropical tree: impacts of herbivory and meristem damage[J].Ecology, 1985, 66(6):1884-1892.
[16]	Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD.The worldwide leaf economics spectrum[J].Nature, 2004, 428(6985):821-827.
[17]	Han WX, Fang JY, Guo D L, Zhang Y.Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across 753 terrestrial plant species in China[J].New Phytol, 2005, 168(2):377-385.
[18]	Read QD, Moorhead LC, Swenson NG, Bailey JK,Sanders NJ.Convergent effects of elevation on functional leaf traits within and among species[J] , Funct Ecol, 2014, 28(1):37-45.
[19]	任书杰, 于贵瑞, 陶波, 王绍强.中国东部南北样带 654 种植物叶片氮和磷的化学计量学特征研究[J].环境科学, 2008, 28(12):2665-2673. Ren SJ, Yu GR, Tao B, Wang SQ.Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across 654 terrestrial plant species in NSTEC[J].Environmental Science, 2008, 28(12): 2665-2673.
[20]	董廷发, 冯玉龙, 类延宝, 张丽坤.干旱和湿润生境中主要优势树种叶片功能性状的比较[J].生态学杂志, 2012, 31(5):1043-1049. Dong TF, Feng YL, Lei YB, Zhang LK.Comparison on leaf functional traits of main dominant woody species in wet and dry habitats[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2012, 31(5): 1043-1049.
[21]	冯秋红, 史作民, 董莉莉, 刘世荣.南北样带温带区栎属树种功能性状间的关系及其对气象因子的响应[J].植物生态学报, 2010, 34(6):619-627. Feng QH, Shi ZM, Dong LL, Liu SR.Relationships among functional traits of Quercus species and their response to meteorological factors in the temperate zone of the north-south transect of Eastern China[J].Jounal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(6): 619-627.
[22]	董莉莉, 刘世荣, 史作民, 冯秋红.中国南北样带上栲属树种叶功能性状与环境因子的关系[J].林业科学研究, 2009, 22(4):463-469. Dong LL, Liu SR, Shi ZM, Feng QH.Relationships between leaf traits of Castanopsis species and the environmental factors in the north-south transect of Eastern China[J].Forest Research, 2009, 22(4):463-469.
[23]	李东胜, 史作民, 刘世荣, 许中旗, 黄选瑞.南北样带温带区栎属树种幼苗功能性状的变异研究[J].林业科学研究, 2013, 26(2):156-162. LI DS, Shi ZM, Liu SR, Xu ZQ, Huang XR.Variation of functional traits of Quercus seedlings from different pro-venances of temperate zone of NSTEC[J].Forest Research, 2013, 26(2): 156-162.
[24]	王玉平, 陶建平, 刘晋仙, 何泽.不同光环境下6种常绿阔叶林树种苗期的叶片功能性状[J].林业科学, 2012, 48(11):23-29. Wang YP, Tao JP, Liu JX, He Z.Response of leaf functional traits to different light regimes in an evergreen broad-leaved forest in the Jinyun Mountain[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2012, 48(11): 23-29.
[25]	Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Modrzynski J, Mrozinski P, Hobbie SE, Eissenstat DM, Chorover J, Chadwick OA, Hale CM, Tjoelker MG.Linking litter calcium, earthworms and soil properties: a common garden test with 14 tree species[J].Ecol Lett, 2005, 8(8):811-818.
[26]	Premoli AC, Raffaele E, Mathiasen P.Morphological and phenological differences in Nothofagus pumilio from contrasting elevations: evidence from a common garden[J].Austral Ecol, 2007, 32(5);515-523.
[27]	Kimball S, Campbell D.Physiological differences among two Penstemon species and their hybrids in field and common garden environments[J].New Phytol, 2009, 181(2): 478-488.
[28]	Tjoelker MG, Craine JM, Wedin D.Linking leaf and root trait syndromes among 39 grassland and savannah species[J].New Phytol, 2005, 167(2):493-508.
[29]	Warren CR, Dreyer E, Tausz M.Ecotype adaptation and acclimation of leaf traits to rainfall in 29 species of 16-year-old Eucalyptus at two common gardens[J].Funct Ecol, 2006, 20(6):929-940.
[30]	赵晓焱, 王传宽, 霍宏.兴安落叶松(Larix gmelinii)光合能力及相关因子的种源差异[J].生态学报, 2008, 28(8):3798-3807. Zhao XY, Wang CK, Huo H.Variations in photosynthetic capacity and associated factors for Larix gmelinii from diverse origins[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008,28(8):3798-3807.
[31]	王致远, 赵广东, 王兵, 邓宗富, 夏晨, 罗嘉东, 王财英.丝栗栲、苦槠和青冈幼苗叶片功能性状对增温和施氮的响应[J].东北林业大学学报, 2014, 42(12):43-49. Wang ZY, Zhao GD, Wang B, Deng ZF, Xia C, Luo JD, Wang CY. Responses of leaf functional traits of Castano-psis fargesii,Castanopsis sclerophylla and Cyclobala-nopsis glauca seedlings to warming and nitrogen addition under artificial control conditions[J].Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2014, 42(12):43-49.
[32]	Craine JM, Froehle J, Tilman DG.The relationships among root and leaf traits of 76 grassland species and relative abundance along fertility and disturbance gra-dients[J].Oikos, 2001, 93(2):274-285.
[33]	Milla R, Reich PB.The scaling of leaf area and mass: the cost of light interception increases with leaf size[J].P Roy Soc Lond B Bio, 2007, 274(1622):2109-2115.
[34]	Wright IJ, Westoby M, Reich PB.Convergence towards higher leaf mass per area in dry and nutrient-poor habitats has different consequences for leaf life span[J].J Ecol, 2002, 90(3):534-543.
[35]	胡勐鸿,贾子瑞,李青粉, 王军辉, 雷曙光, 王海仓.云杉属7个种针叶性状种间和种内变异分析[J].西北植物学报,2013, 33(12):2529-2536. Hu MH, Jia ZR, Li QF, Wang JH, Lei SG, Wang HC.Interspecific and intraspecific variation of needle character of seven Picea species[J].Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2013, 33(12): 2529-2536.
[36]	安晓娟,李萍,戴伟, 尹其悦, 王丹, 莫莉.亚热带几种林分类型土壤有机碳变化特征及与土壤性质的关系[J].中国农学通报, 2012, 28(22):53-58. An XJ, Li P, Dai W, Yi QY, Wang D, Mo L.The variation characteristics of soil organic carbon and its relationship with soil properties in typical subtropical plantations[J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2012, 28(22):53-58.
[37]	陈彩云, 白莉萍, 龙健, 刘锐敏, 陆海波.堆肥污泥对杨树幼苗主要抗逆生理动态变化的影响[J].生态环境学报, 2012, 21(10): 1763-1770. Chen CY, Bai LP, Long J, Liu MR, Lu HB.Dynamic changes of main stress-resistance physiology in poplar seedlings exposed to composted sewage sludge[J].Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2012, 21(10): 1763-1770.
[38]	杨士俊,温仲明,苗连朋,戚德辉,花东文.黄土丘陵区植物功能性状对微地形变化的响应[J].应用生态学报, 2015, 25(12):3413-3419. Yang SJ, Wen ZM, Miao LP, Qi DH, Hua DW.Respo-nses of plant functional traits to micro-topographical changes in hilly and gully region of the loess plateau, China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 25(12): 3413-3419.
[39]	牛书丽, 蒋高明, 高雷明, 李永庚, 刘美珍.内蒙古浑善达克沙地97种植物的光合生理特征[J].植物生态学报,2003,27(3):318-324. Niu SL, Jiang GM, Gao LM, Li YG, Liu MZ.Comparison of gas exchange traits of different plant species in hunshandak sand area[J].Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2003, 27(3): 318-324.
[40]	李晓兰, 李雪华, 蒋德明, 刘志民, 王红梅, 姬兰柱.科尔沁沙地 22 种菊科草本植物叶片形态特征研究[J].生态学杂志, 2005, 24(12): 1397-1401. Li XL, Li XH, Jiang DM, Liu ZM, Wang HM, Ji LZ.Leaf morphological characters of 22 compositae herbaceous species in Horqin sandy land[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2005, 24(12): 1397-1401.
[41]	施宇, 温仲明, 龚时慧.黄土丘陵区植物叶片与细根功能性状关系及其变化[J].生态学报, 2011, 31(22):6805-6813. Shi Y, Wen ZM, Gong SH.Comparisons of relationships between leaf and fine root traits in hilly area of the loess plateau, Yanhe River basin, Shaanxi Province, China[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(22): 6805-6814.
[42]	洪陈洁,林晗,洪伟,王珉,洪滔.不同品系福建山樱花叶功能性状研究[J].热带亚热带植物学报, 2015, 23(2):191-196. Hong CJ, Lin H, Hong W, Wang M, Hong T.Leaf functional characteristics in different strains of Prunus campa-nulata[J].Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 2015, 23(2): 191-196.
[43]	Wilson PJ, Thompson K, Hodgson JG.Specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content as alternative predictors of plant strategies[J].New Phytol, 1999, 143(1):155-162.
[44]	Garnier E.Growth analysis of congeneric annual and perennial grass species[J].J Ecol, 1992, 80(4):665-675.
[45]	祁建,马克明,张育新.北京东灵山不同坡位辽东栎(Quercus liaotungensis)叶属性的比较[J].生态学报, 2008, 28(1):122-128. QI J, Ma KM, Zhang YX.Comparisons on leaf traits of Quercus liaotungensis Koidz.on different slope positions in Dongling Moutain of Beijing[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(1): 122-128.
[46]	Garnier E, Laurent G, Bellmann A, Debain S, Berthelier P, Ducout B, Roumet C, Navas ML.Consistency of species ranking based on functional leaf traits[J].New Phytol, 2001, 152(1):69-83.
[47]	Vendramini F, Díaz S, Gurvich DE, Wilson PJ, Thompson K, Hodgson JG.Leaf traits as indicators of resource-use strategy in floras with succulent species[J].New Phytol, 2002, 154(1):147-157.
[48]	Roche P, Díaz-Burlinson N, Gachet S.Congruency analysis of species ranking based on leaf traits: which traits are the more reliable?[J].Plant Ecol, 2004, 174(1):37-48.
[49]	Reich PB, Oleksyn J.Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude[J].P Natl Acad Sci USA , 2004, 101(30):11001-11006.
[50]	Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS, Affiliations A.From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning[J].P Natl Acad Sci, 1997, 94(25):13730-13734.
[51]	He JS, Wang ZH, Wang XP, Schmid B, Zuo WY, Zhou M, Zheng CY, Wang MF, Fang JY.A test of the generality of leaf trait relationships on the Tibetan Plateau[J].New Phytol, 2006, 170(4):835-848.
[52]	曾德慧,陈广生.生态化学计量学:复杂生命系统奥秘的探索[J].植物生态学报, 2005, 29(6):1007-1019. Zeng DH, Chen GS.Ecological stoichiometry: a science to explore the complexity of living systems [J].Jounal of Plant Ecology, 2005, 29(6): 1007-1019.
[53]	付登高,段昌群.植物功能性状在植物生态学中的研究进展[M] //段昌群.生态科学进展.北京: 高等教育出版社,2007:97-121. Fu DG, Duan CQ.Advances in Plant Functional Traits in Plant Ecology[M] //Duan CQ ed.Advances in Ecological Sciences.Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2007: 97-121.
[54]	Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS, Vose JM, Volin JC, Gresham C, Bowman WD.Relationships of leaf dark respiration to leaf nitrogen, specific leaf area and leaf life-span: a test across biomes and functional groups[J].Oecologia, 1998, 114(4): 471-482.
[55]	徐兴友,张风娟,王子华, 尹伟伦, 王华芳.燕山地区6种花灌木幼苗耐旱特性的研究[J].西北植物学报, 2007, 27(10):2080-2088. Xu WY, Zhang FJ, Wang ZH, Yi WL, Wang HF.Relationship between drought resistance and leaf water balance ability of six shrubs in Yanshan area[J].Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2007, 27(10): 2080-2088.
[56]	曾小平, 赵平, 蔡锡安, 饶兴权, 刘惠, 马玲, 李长洪.25种南亚热带植物耐阴性的初步研究[J].北京林业大学学报, 2006, 28(4):88-95. Zeng XP, Zhao P, Cai XA, Rao XQ, Liu H, Ma L, Li CH.Shade-tolerance of 25 low subtropical plants[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2006, 28(4):88-95.
[57]	Garnier E, Cordonnier P, Guillerm JL, Sonié L.Specific leaf area and leaf nitrogen concentration in annual and perennial grass species growing in Mediterranean old-fields[J].Oecologia, 1997, 111(4):490-498.
[58]	李永华, 罗天祥, 卢琦, 田晓娅, 吴波, 杨恒华.青海省沙珠玉治沙站17种主要植物叶性因子的比较[J].生态学报, 2005, 25(5): 995-999. Li YH, Luo TX, Lu Q, Tian XY, Wu B, Yang HX.Compa-risons of leaf traits among 17 major plant species in Shazhuyu Sand Control Experimental Station of Qinghai Province[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 25(5): 995-999.