Determination of the minimum sampling area for Populus pruinosa communities in desert riparian forest and comparison of research methods
-
摘要: 荒漠河岸林是塔里木极端干旱区唯一的森林群落类型，群落结构组成简单。我们采用种-面积曲线、群落系数-面积曲线与重要值-面积曲线3种方法对塔里木河上游荒漠河岸林灰胡杨（Populus pruinosa Schrenk）群落最小面积进行研究。结果显示，4种饱和种-面积曲线的拟合效果差异明显，S=aA/（1+bA）和S=a（1-e-bA）模型拟合的相关系数较高（P < 0.01），拟合效果优于其它2种模型。当取样面积为100 m2时，可包括群落60%~80%的物种数，取样面积为200 m2时，则可包括群落90%的物种数。群落系数-面积曲线与重要值-面积曲线2种方法确定的群落最小面积均为400 m2，二者克服了种-面积曲线仅关注物种出现与否和饱和种的估算问题，拟合结果更符合实际情况，更适用于塔里木荒漠河岸林最小取样面积的确定。本研究结果表明荒漠河岸林包括60%、80%、90%群落物种的临界抽样面积分别为100 m2、200 m2和400 m 2，可以满足不同研究精度的要求；塔里木河上游荒漠河岸林灰胡杨群落学调查的最适取样面积是400 m2。Abstract: Desert riparian forest is a unique forest community type found in extreme arid areas with a simple community structure.The minimum sampling area of Populus pruinosa communities in the desert riparian forest in the upper reaches of the Tarim River was studied using species-area,community coefficient-area,and importance value-area curves.Results showed the fitting effect was obviously different in the four saturated species-area curves.The S=aA/(1+bA) and S=a(1-e-bA) models had higher fitting correlation coefficients (P<0.01) and the best fitting results compared with the two other models.Using these two models,the minimum sampling area for P.pruinosa communities corresponding to 60%-80% of the total number of species was 100 m2.The minimum sampling area corresponding to 90% of the total number of species was 200 m2.The minimum sampling area calculated by the community coefficient-area curves and importance value-area curves was 400 m2,with both methods overcoming the shortcomings of the species-area curves,which only focused on species appearance or absence,and the estimation problems of saturation species.The fitting effect better conformed to the actual situation,and the two methods were suitable for determining the minimum sampling area required in the desert riparian forest of the Tarim Basin.These results indicated that the minimum sampling area corresponding to 60%,80%,and 90% of total species number of the P.pruinosa community were 100 m2,200 m2,and 400 m2,respectively.The optimal sampling area of the P.pruinosa community in the desert riparian forest in the upper reaches of Tarim River was 400 m2.
-
-
[1] 邓红兵, 吴刚, 郝占庆, 王庆礼,代力民, 高林, 王建中.马尾松-栎类天然混交林群落最小面积确定及方法比较[J]. 生态学报, 1999, 19(4):499-503. Deng HB, Wu G, Hao ZQ, Wang QL, Dai LM, Gao L, Wang JZ. Determination of the minimum sampling area for Pinus massoniana-Quercus community and comparion of sampling methods[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1999, 19(4):499-503.
[2] 牛俊勇, 徐海量, 李吉玫, 杨红梅. 塔里木河下游荒漠河岸林群落最小取样面积[J]. 生态学杂志, 2009, 28(6):1182-1187. Niu JY, Xu HL, Li JM, Yang HM. Minimum sapling area for desert rjparian forest community in lower reaches of Tarim River[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2009, 28(6):1182-1187.
[3] Matthews TJ, Triantis KA, Rigal F, Borregaard MK, Guilhaumon F, Whittaker RJ. Island species-area relationships and species accumulation curves are not equivalent:an analysis of habitat island datasets[J]. Global Ecol Biogeogr, 2016, 25(5):607-618.
[4] Kong WJ, Xia HJ, Zhang Y. Minimum sampling area for the monitoring of herb diversity in riparian zone of tempe-rate rivers, China[J]. Ecol Res, 2016, 31(4):547-555.
[5] Cristaudo A, Restuccia A, Andrea O, Gresta F. Species-area relationships and minimum area in citrus grove weed communities[J]. Plant Biosyst, 2015, 149(2):337-345.
[6] Tsai CH, Lin YC, Wiegand T, Nakazawa T, Su SH, Hsieh CH, Ding TS. Individual species-area relationship of woody plant communities in a heterogeneous subtropical monsoon rainforest[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(4):1-14.
[7] Yamaura YC, Connor EF, Royle JA, Itoh K, Sato K, Taki H, Mishima Y. Estimating species-area relationships by modeling abundance and frequency subject to incomplete sampling[J]. Ecol Evol, 2016, 6(14):4836-4848.
[8] Golivets M, Bihun Y. Patterns of plant species diversity in deciduous woodlands of Kyiv, Ukraine[J]. Urban Ecosyst, 2016, 19:489-503.
[9] 唐志尧, 乔秀娟, 方精云. 生物群落的种-面积关系[J]. 生物多样性, 2009, 17(6):549-559. Tang ZY, Qiao XJ, Fang JY. Species-area relationship in biological communities[J].Biodiversity Science, 2009, 17(6):549-559.
[10] 刘敏, 刘羽霞, 任可心, 阿尔孜古力, 魏向晨, 程硕, 王蕾. 种-面积曲线三种扩大样地面积的方法比较[J]. 首都师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2014, 35(5):60-63. Liu M, Liu YX, Ren KX, Arzigul, Wei XC, Cheng S, Wang L. Species-area curves of the three methods to expand comparative plot area[J]. Journal of Capital Normal University:Natural Science Edition, 2014, 35(5):60-63.
[11] 王伯荪, 李鸣光. 重要值-面积曲线在热带亚热带森林中的应用[J]. 植物生态学与地植物学学报, 1986, 10(3):161-170. Wang BS, Li MG. Application of importance value-area curve to tropical and subtropical forests[J]. Acta Phytoecologica et Geobotanica Sinica, 1986, 10(3):161-170.
[12] 游水生, 王小明, 王海为. 福建中亚热带常绿阔叶林(米槠林)最小面积的确定[J]. 武汉植物学研究, 2002, 20(6):438-442. You SS, Wang XM, Wang HW. Determination of the minimum sampling area for mid-subtropical evergreen broad-leaf forest (Castanopsis carlesii Forest) in Fujian Pro-vince, China[J]. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research, 2002, 20(6):438-442.
[13] 王睿智, 国庆喜. 兴安岭阔叶红松林木本植物种-面积关系[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(13):4091-4098. Wang RG, Guo QX. Woody plants species-area relationships in a broad-leaved Korean pine forest in the Xiao-xing'an Mountains[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(13):4091-4098.
[14] 王志高, 吴甘霖, 段仁燕, 张中信. 皖西多枝尖山区不同生活型植物种-面积关系研究[J]. 陕西师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2016, 44(3):91-94. Wang ZG, Wu GL, Duan RY, Zhang ZG. Relationships between different life form species and its possessive area in Duozhijian, Dabieshan mountain, west Anhui Province[J]. Journal of Shaanxi Normal University:Natural Science Edition, 2016, 44(3):91-94.
[15] Horník J, Janeček Š, Klimešová J, Doležal J, Janečková P, Jiráská Š, Lanta V. Species-area curves revisited:the effects of model choice on parameter sensitivity to environmental, community, and individual plant characteristics[J]. Plant Ecol, 2012, 213(10):1675-1686.
[16] Tiorve E. Shapes and functions of species-area curves (Ⅱ ):a review of new model and parameterizations[J]. J Biogeogr, 2009, 36(8):1435-1445.
[17] 李霞, 唐金, 万红梅. 塔里木河下游植物调查最小取样面积分析[J]. 中国沙漠, 2011, 31(5):1221-1225. Li X, Tang J, Wan HM. Analysis on the minimum sampling area of vegetation survey in the lower reaches of the Tarim River[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2011, 31(5):1221-1225.
[18] 姜俊, 张春雨, 赵秀海. 吉林蛟河42 hm2针阔混交林样地植物种-面积关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(1):30-38. Jiang J, Zhang CY. Zhao XH. Plant species-area relationship in a 42 hm2 research plot of coniferous and board-leaved mixed forest in Jiaohe, Jilin Province, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2012, 36(1):30-38.
[19] 韩路, 王家强, 王海珍, 牛建龙, 于军. 塔里木荒漠绿洲过渡带主要种群生态位与空间格局分析[J]. 植物科学学报, 2016, 34(3):352-360. Han L, Wang JQ, Wang HZ, Niu JL, Yu J. Niche and spatial distribution pattern analysis of the main populations of the Tarim desert-oasis ecotone[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2016, 34(3):352-360.
[20] Pan YG, Chen YP, Chen YN, Wang RZ, Ren ZG. Impact of groundwater depth on leaf hydraulic properties and drought vulnerability of Populus euphratica in the northwest of China[J]. Trees, 2016, 30(6):2029-2039.
[21] Lang P, Ahlborn J, Schaefer P, Wommelsdorf T, Jeschke M, Zhang XM, Thomas FM. Growth and water use of Populus euphratica trees and stands with different water supply along the Tarim River, NW China[J]. Forest Ecol Manag,2016, 380:139-148.
[22] 周梦丽, 张青, 亢新刚, 杨英军, 王全军. 云冷杉天然林乔木树种组成及物种多样性对择伐强度的动态响应[J]. 植物科学学报, 2016, 34(1):56-66. Zhou ML, Zhang Q, Kang XG, Yang YJ, Wang QJ. Dynamic response to selective cutting intensity on tree species structure and species diversity in a natural spruce-fir forest[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2016, 34(1):56-66.
[23] He FL, Legendre P. Species diversity patterns derived from species-area models[J]. Ecology, 2002, 83:1185-1198.
[24] Samuel MS. Six types of species-area curves[J]. Global Ecol Biogeogr, 2003, 12(6):441-447.
[25] 代力民, 王青春, 邓红兵, 陈高, 王庆礼. 二道白河河岸带植物群落最小面积与物种丰富度[J]. 应用生态学报, 2002, 13(6):641-645. Dai LM, Wang QC, Deng HB, Chen G, Wang QL. Minimum sampling area and species richness of riparian community in Erdaobaihe forested watershed[J]. Chinesd Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002, 13(6):641-645.
计量
- 文章访问数: 1019
- HTML全文浏览量: 3
- PDF下载量: 1099
下载:
