Phenotypic variation in cultivar populations of Paeonia ostii T. Hong et J. X. Zhang
-
摘要: 从我国6个凤丹（Paeonia ostii T.Hong et J.X.Zhang）中心产区，选取15个群体共398个单株，对20个表型性状进行调查和分析。结果显示，枝条数、地径、株高、茎长、冠幅长、冠幅宽、成花枝、芽位数、叶长和叶宽等10个表型性状受植株株龄的影响显著，随着株龄增加，除叶长和叶宽的平均值呈递减趋势外，其他8个性状的平均值都呈现递增趋势。凤丹群体间的表型分化系数为0~50.14%，平均值为27.62%，变化幅度最大的是二年生枝长，最小的为心皮数和二年生枝径。对当年生枝长、芽位高、当年生枝径、顶生小叶长、二年生枝径、顶生小叶宽、复叶数、心皮数、二年生枝长和叶柄长等不受株龄影响的10个表型性状进行主成分分析，结果显示前6个性状是影响表型差异的主要性状。各表型性状间存在一定的相关性，聚类分析结果将受株龄影响的10个性状划分为4组。研究结果表明凤丹表型性状在群体间和群体内的变异非常丰富，可为遗传改良和品种选育储备丰富的植物材料。Abstract: In the present study, variation in 20 phenotypic traits of 398 samples of Paeonia ostii T. Hong et J. X. Zhang from 15 seedling populations in six provinces were investigated and analyzed. Results showed that 10 traits, including branch number, ground diameter, plant height, stem length, crown length, crown width, flower branch, bud number, leaf length, and leaf width, were significantly affected by plant age. With the increase of plant age, the mean values of leaf length and width showed a decreasing trend, whereas the other eight traits showed an increasing trend. The average phenotypic differentiation coefficients (Vst) between populations were between 0 and 50.14%, with an average value of 27.62%. Annual growth length exhibited the largest variation, whereas number of carpels and annual diameter showed the smallest. Principal component analysis was conducted for the 10 traits affected by plant age, including length of one-year-old branches, bud height, diameter of one-year-old branches, length of terminal leaflets, diameter of two-year-old branches, width of terminal leaflets, leaf number, carpel number, length of two-year-old branches, and petiole length. Results showed that the first six characters were the main traits accounting for the phenotypic differences. There were some correlations between phenotypic traits, with the 10 traits affected by plant age being divided into four groups by cluster analysis. There was great variation among populations and within populations in these provinces, which provides a wealth of material for variety breeding and germplasm innovation for P. ostii.
-
-
[1] 葛颂, 洪德元. 遗传多样性及其检测方法[M]//钱迎倩, 马克平. 生物多样性研究的原理与方法. 北京:中国科学技术出版社, 1994. [2] 曾杰, 郑海水, 甘四明, 白嘉雨. 广西西南桦天然居群的表型变异[J]. 林业科学, 2005, 41(2):59-65. Zeng J, Zheng HB, Gan SM, Bai JY. Phenotypic variation in natural populations of Betula alnoides in Guangxi, China[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2005, 41(2):59-65.
[3] 洪德元, 潘开玉. 芍药属牡丹组的分类历史和分类处理[J]. 植物分类学报, 1999, 37(4):351-368. Hong DY, Pan KY. Taxonomical history and revision of Paeonia sect. Moutan (Paeoniaceae)[J]. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica, 1999, 37(4):351-368.
[4] 成仿云, 李嘉珏, 陈德忠. 中国野生牡丹自然繁殖特性研究[J]. 园艺学报, 1997, 24(2):180-184. Cheng FY, Li JJ, Chen DZ. The natural propagation cha-racteristics of wild tree peony species in China[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 1997, 24(2):180-184.
[5] 潘法连. 铜陵牡丹历史述论[J]. 古今农业, 1989(1):70-75. Pan FL. The history of Tongling peony[J]. Journal of Ancient and Modern Agriculture, 1989(1):70-75.
[6] 韩继刚, 李晓青, 刘炤, 胡永红. 牡丹油用价值及其应用前景[J]. 粮食与油脂, 2014(5):21-25. Han JG, Li XQ, Liu Z, Hu YH. Potential applications of tree peony as an oil plant[J]. Cereals & Oils, 2014(5):21-25.
[7] 王佳. 杨山牡丹遗传多样性与江南牡丹品种资源研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2009. [8] 林萍, 姚小华, 曹永庆, 薛亮, 王开良. 油用牡丹‘凤丹’果实性状及其脂肪酸组分的变异分析[J]. 经济林研究, 2015(1):67-72. Lin P, Yao XH, Cao YQ, Xue L, Wang KL. Variation analysis of fruit characteristics and fatty acid components in Paeonia ostii ‘Phoenix White’[J]. Nonwood Forest Research, 2015(1):67-72.
[9] 洪德元, 潘开玉, 周志钦. Paeonia suffruticosa Andrews的界定, 兼论栽培牡丹的分类鉴定问题[J]. 植物分类学报, 2004, 42(3):275-283. Hong DY, Pan KY, Zhou ZQ. Circumscription of Paeonia suffruticosa Andrews and identification of cultivated tree peonies[J]. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica, 2004, 42(3):275-283.
[10] Zhou SL, Zou XH, Zhou ZQ, Liu J, Xu C, et al. Multiple species of wild tree peonies gave rise to the ‘king of flowers’, Paeonia suffruticosa Andrews[J]. Proc Biol Sci, 2014, 281:1687.
[11] 葛颂, 王明庥, 陈岳武. 用同工酶研究马尾松群体的遗传结构[J]. 林业科学, 1988, 24(4):399-409. Ge S, Wang MX, Chen YW. Study on the genetic structure of masson pine population by isoenzyme[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 1988, 24(4):399-409.
[12] 顾正清, 李亚男. 棉花株高与生产力的相关分析[J]. 棉花科学, 1998(2):12-15. Gu ZQ, Li YN. The interrelated analysis of cotton height and productive forces[J]. Cotton Sciences, 1998(2):12-15.
[13] 陈化榜, 李晴祺. 小麦高产品种(系)单株生产力与三组性状间的典型相关分析[J]. 山东农业大学学报:自然科学版, 1990(3):67-70. Chen HB, Li QQ. Canonical corralation analysis of plant yield and three groups of characters in wheat[J]. Journal of Shandong Agricultura University:Natural Science Edition, 1990(3):67-70.
[14] 张忠信, 汤丰收, 张新友, 韩锁义, 董文召, 等. 河南省夏播花生主要农艺性状与单株生产力的遗传相关及通径分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(30):16817-16819. Zhang ZX, Tang FS, Zhang XY, Han SY, Dong WZ, et al. Genetic correlation and path coefficient analysis of main agronomic characters and productivity of summer peanut in Henan Province[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Science, 2010, 38(30):16817-16819.
[15] 江建华, 倪皖莉, 于欢欢, 管叔琪, 肖美华. 花生单株生产力与主要农艺性状间的相关性研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(36):125-130. Jiang JH, Ni WL, Yu HH, Guan SQ, Xiao MH. The correlation analysis between productivity per plant and major agronomic traits of peanut[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2013, 29(36):125-130.
[16] 崔虎亮, 黄弄璋, 闫海川, 刘建鑫. 油用牡丹单株产量和主要表型性状的相关性[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2017, 38(2):86-91. Cui HL, Huang NZ, Yan HC, Liu JX. Correlation between yield per plant and main phenotypic traits of Paeonia suffruticosa for oil production[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2017, 38(2):86-91.
[17] 陈香波, 叶文国, 田旗, 张启翔. 夏蜡梅天然群体表型变异及分布特征[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2010, 32(2):133-140. Chen XB, Ye WG, Tian Q, Zhang QX. Phenotypic variation and distribution pattern of natural populations of Sinocalycanthus chinensis[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2010, 32(2):133-140.
[18] 罗建勋, 顾万春. 云杉天然群体表型多样性研究[J]. 林业科学, 2005, 41(2):66-73. Luo JX, Gu WC. Study on phenotypic diversity of natural population in Picea asperata[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2005, 41(2):66-73.
[19] 彭兴民, 吴疆翀, 郑益兴, 张燕平. 云南引种印楝实生栽培种群表型的地理变异[J]. 植物环境学报, 2013, 26(4):399-405. Peng XM, Wu JC, Zheng YX, Zhang YP. Geographic variation of morphological characters among cultivated neem (Azadirachta indica) populations in Yunnan, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2013, 26(4):399-405.
[20] Peng LP, Cai CF, Zhong Y, Xu XX, Xian HL, Cheng FY. Genetic analyses reveal independent domestication origins of the emerging oil crop Paeonia ostii, a tree peony with a long-term cultivation history[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1):5340.
[21] 李嘉珏. 中国牡丹起源的研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 1998(2):22-26. Li JJ. Studies on the origin of tree peony[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 1988(2):22-26.
[22] 庞广昌, 姜冬梅. 群体遗传多样性和数据分析[J]. 林业科学, 1995, 31(6):543-550. Pang GC, Jiang DM. Population genetic diversity and data analysis[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 1995, 31(6):543-550.
[23] 孙海芹, 李昂, 班玮, 郑晓明, 葛颂. 濒危植物独花兰的形态变异及其适应意义[J]. 生物多样性, 2005, 13(5):376-386. Sun HQ, Li A, Ban W, Zheng XM, Ge S. Morphological variation and its adaptive significance for Changnienia amoena, an endangered orchid[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2005, 13(5):376-386.
[24] Pigliucci M, Murren CJ, Schlichting CD. Phenotypic plasticity and evolution by genetic assimilation[J]. J Exp Biol, 2006, 209(12):2362.
[25] 蔡长福. 牡丹高密度遗传图谱构建及重要性状QTL分析[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2015. [26] 王永康, 吴国良, 赵爱玲, 李登科. 枣种质资源的表型遗传多样性[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(10):33-41. Wang YK, Wu GL, Zhao AL, Li DK. Phenotypic genetic diversity of jujube germplasm resources[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50(10):33-41.
[27] Mclntyre S, Lavorel S, Landsberg J, Forbes TDA. Disturbance response in vegetation:towards a global perspective on functional traits[J]. J Veg Sci, 1999, 10(5):621-630.
[28] 吴丽丽, 康宏樟, 庄红蕾, 刘春江. 区域尺度上栓皮栎叶性状变异及其与气候因子的关系[J]. 生态学杂志, 2010, 29(12):2309-2316. Wu LL, Kang HZ, Zhuang HL, Liu CJ. Variations of Quercus variabilis leaf traits in relation to climatic factors at regional scale[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2010, 29(12):2309-2316.
[29] Wahid A, Gelani S, Ashraf M, Foolad MR. Heat tolerance in plants:an overview[J]. Environ Exp Bot, 2007, 61(3):199-223.
[30] Kao WY, Chang KW. Altitudinal trends in photosynthetic rate and leaf characteristics of Miscanthus populations from central Taiwan[J]. Aust J Bot, 2001, 49(4):509-514.
[31] 宋璐璐, 樊江文, 吴绍洪. 植物叶片性状沿海拔梯度变化研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2011, 30(11):1431-1439. Song LL, Fan JW, Wu SH. Research advances on changes of leaf traits along an altitude gradient[J].Progress in Geography, 2011, 30(11):1431-1439.
[32] 张晓骁, 张延龙, 牛立新. 秦岭芍药属植物及其地理分布修订[J]. 西北植物学报, 2016, 36(5):1046-1054. Zhang XX, Zhang YL, Niu LX. A revision of Paeoniain Qinling mountains[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2016, 36(5):1046-1054.
-
期刊类型引用(5)
1. 侯亚欣，杨赵平，刘香楠，菅佳鑫，曾思维. 同域分布5种柽柳属植物不同开花时期花粉活力研究. 西北林学院学报. 2025(01): 83-91 . 
百度学术
2. 孙瑶，钟问，李一博. 塔里木盆地东南缘多枝柽柳主要传粉昆虫及其传粉生物学特征. 新疆农业科学. 2024(06): 1497-1504 . 百度学术
3. 赛丽塔娜提·赛达克拜尔，钟问，余润泽. 盐地柽柳(Tamarix karelinii Bunge)的传粉生物学特征及传粉能力差异. 新疆农业科学. 2023(07): 1756-1765 . 百度学术
4. 麦迪乃姆·阿卜杜热伊木，钟问. 塔里木盆地三种柽柳的主要传粉昆虫及访花行为. 西南农业学报. 2023(06): 1328-1335 . 百度学术
5. 哈里布努尔，古丽扎尔·阿不都克力木，热依拉穆·麦麦提吐尔逊，艾沙江·阿不都沙拉木. 黑果枸杞两种花型的花部综合征与传粉特性. 植物生态学报. 2022(09): 1050-1063 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 745
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 1097
- 被引次数: 8
下载:
