成都地区10种园林灌木叶片结构与抗旱性关系研究

范志霞; 陈越悦; 付荷玲

doi:10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2019.10070

成都地区10种园林灌木叶片结构与抗旱性关系研究

四川农业大学风景园林学院, 四川温江 611130

基金项目: 国家科技支撑计划项目（2013BAJ02B03）

详细信息

作者简介:
范志霞(1977-),女,博士,讲师,研究方向为园林植物抗旱性(E-mail:46766243@qq.com)

通讯作者:
范志霞.Email:46766243@qq.com

中图分类号: Q944.56
计量
- 文章访问数: 746
- HTML全文浏览量: 5
- PDF下载量: 656
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2018-08-06
- 修回日期: 2018-09-04
- 发布日期: 2019-02-27

Study on drought resistance and leaf structure in 10 species of garden shrubs in Chengdu

College of Landscape Architecture, Sichuan Agriculture University, Wenjiang, Sichuan 611130, China

Funds: This work was supported by a grant from the National Science and Technology Support Program Project (2013BAJ02B03)

摘要

摘要: 利用石蜡切片法和指甲油印迹法，对成都地区10种常见园林灌木叶片解剖结构的13个指标：主脉厚度、叶片厚度、上下表皮角质层厚度、上下表皮厚度、栅栏组织厚度、海绵组织厚度、下表皮气孔密度、气孔长度、气孔宽度、叶片结构紧密度、栅栏组织与海绵组织厚度比（栅海比）进行测定和分析，再用方差分析和主成分分析法选取有代表性的指标，结合隶属函数法对物种间的抗旱性进行综合评价。结果显示，13个指标的变异系数为17.40% ~ 68.20%，在10种园林灌木间差异极显著。10种植物都属于异面叶，组织结构易于辨识（三角梅的下表皮角质层太薄，无法测出数据）。叶片结构紧密度、栅海比、气孔密度、气孔长、气孔宽、栅栏组织厚度可作为评价这10种园林灌木抗旱性的重要指标。抗旱性由强到弱依次为：红花继木、鸭脚木、红叶石楠、栀子、西洋杜鹃、海桐、山茶、雀舌黄杨、三角梅和金边大叶黄杨。其中红花继木、鸭脚木、红叶石楠和栀子属于强抗旱品种，可用于屋顶、边坡等区域种植。
- 叶片结构 /
- 抗旱性 /
- 园林灌木 /
- 隶属函数 /
- 主成分分析
Abstract: The leaf anatomical structure of 10 species of common garden shrubs in Chengdu were observed by paraffin sectioning and nail polish sealing. Indicators were measured and analyzed, which included thickness of main vein, thickness of leaf, cuticle thickness of upper epidermis, cuticle thickness of lower epidermis, thickness of upper epidermis, thickness of lower epidermis, thickness of palisade tissue, thickness of spongy tissue, stoma density of lower epidermis, stoma length, stoma width, and compactness and thickness ratio of palisade tissue to spongy tissue. Through variance and principal component analyses, representative indicators were selected, and drought resistance was evaluated among species by membership function. Results showed that the 13 indicators exhibited significant differences among the 10 garden shrubs, with variation coefficients ranging from 17.40%-68.20%. The 10 species belonged to bifacial leaves and their tissue structures were well recognized. The cuticle of the lower epidermis of Bougainvillea spectabilis Willd was too thin to obtain specific measurement data. Leaf structure compactness, ratio of palisade tissue to spongy tissue, stoma density, stoma length, stoma width, and thickness of palisade tissue were the main indices able to evaluate drought resistance of the 10 shrubs. Drought resistance in descending order was Loropetalum chinense var. rubrum Yieh, Schefflera octophylla(Lour.) Harms, Photinia fraseri Dress, Gardenia jasminoides Ellis, Rhododendron hybrida Hort., Pittosporum tobira(Thunb.) Ait., Camellia japonica L., Buxus bodinieriLevl., B. spectabilis Willd, Euonymus japonicus var. aureo-marginatus Hort. Furthermore, L. chinense var . rubrum Yieh, S.octophylla(Lour.) Harms, P. fraseri Dress, and G. jasminoides Ellis were strong drought resistant varieties and could be widely cultivated on roofs and slopes.
- Leaf structure /
- Drought resistance /
- Garden shrubs /
- Subordinate function /
- Principle component analysis

HTML全文

参考文献(22)

[1]	黄雪菊,孙辉,唐亚. 城市化背景下成都市水资源安全及可持续发展[J]. 世界科技研究与发展,2004,26(5):74-78. Huang XJ,Sun H,Tang Y. Security and sustainability of water resource in Chengdu in the 21st century[J]. World Sci-Tech R & D,2004,26(5):74-78.
[2]	张红霞,刘果厚,崔秀萍. 干旱对浑善达克沙地榆叶片解剖结构的影响[J]. 植物研究,2005,25(1):39-44.Zhang HX,Liu GH,Cui XP. Affection of aridity to anatomical structure of leave of Ulmus pumila L. var. sabulosa[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research,2005,25(1):39-44.
[3]	李波,陈雪梅,李铁缘,高云鹏,李红. 2种不同抗旱性冰草叶片解剖结构的比较[J]. 江苏农业科学,2015,43(9):247-249.
[4]	史晓霞,张国芳,孟林,毛培春,刘自学. 马蔺叶片解剖结构特征与其抗旱性关系研究[J]. 植物研究,2008,28(5):584-588.Shi XX,Zhang GF,Meng L,Mao PC,Liu ZX. Relationship between the leaf tissue characteristic and drought resistance of Iris lactea Pall. var. chinensis (Fisch.)[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research,2008,28(5):584-588.
[5]	董晓民,张安宁,刘伟,李桂祥,胡广波,滕兴荣,张守民. 扁桃及普通桃品种的叶片解剖结构及耐旱性分析[J]. 山东农业科学,2017,49(11):45-47.Dong XM,Zhang AN,Liu W,Li GX,Hu GB,Teng XR,Zhang SM. Leaf anatomical structures and drought resis tance analysis of almond and common each varieties[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences,2017,49(11):45-47.
[6]	杨森,张晓飞,高新生,李维国. 5个品系橡胶树叶片解剖结构及其抗旱性分析[J]. 热带生物学报,2017,8(3):301-306. Yang S,Zhang XF,Gao XS,Li WG. Leaf anatomical structure and drought resistance analysis of 5 rubber clones (Hevea brasiliensis)[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology,2017,8(3):301-306.
[7]	唐婧文,吴思政,梁文斌,李建挥,柏文富,禹霖,聂东伶. 湖南引种蓝莓叶片结构特征的比较及其耐旱性研究[J]. 经济林研究,2017,35(4):90-98.Tang JW,Wu SZ,Liang WB,Li JH,Bai WF,Yu L,Nie DL. Leaf structure characteristics and drought resistance of blueberry in Hunan Province[J]. Nonwood Forest Research,2017,35(4):90-98.
[8]	刘娜,宋柏权,杨骥. 不同播期甜菜纸筒苗解剖结构的抗旱性分析[J]. 中国糖料,2016,38(6):10-12.Liu N,Song BQ,Yang J. Analysis of drought resistance on anatomical leaf structure of paper-tube sugar beet seedlings with different sowing date[J]. Sugar Crops of China,2016,38(6):10-12.
[9]	潘昕,邱权,李吉跃,王军辉,何茜,苏艳,马建伟,杜坤. 基于叶片解剖结构对青藏高原25种灌木的抗旱性评价[J]. 华南农业大学学报,2015,36(2):61-68.Pan X,Qiu Q,Li JY,Wang JH,He Q,Su Y,Ma JW,Du K. Drought resistance evaluation based on leaf anatomical structures of 25 shrubs on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University,2015,36(2):61-68.
[10]	杨小玉. 5种沙生灌木叶片解剖结构与抗旱性研究[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2008.
[11]	韩刚,李少雄,徐鹏,韩恩贤. 6种灌木叶片解剖结构的抗旱性分析[J]. 西北林学院学报,2006,21(4):43-46.Han G,Li SX,Xu P,Han EX. Analysis of drought resis tance on anatomical structure of leave of six species of shrubs[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University,2006,21(4):43-46.
[12]	周仪. 植物形态解剖实验[M]. 北京:北京师范大学出版社,2000.
[13]	李芬. 细胞生物学实验技术[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2007.
[14]	刘明智,努尔巴衣·阿布都沙力克,潘晓玲. 指甲油涂抹撕取法制取植物叶气孔装片[J]. 生物学通报, 2005,40(10):44-45.Liu MZ,Nuerbayi A,Pan XL. Preparation of plant leaf stomatal patches by nail polish smearing and tearing[J]. Biological Bulletin,2005,40(10):44-45.
[15]	刘红茹,冯永忠,王得祥,崔宏安. 延安城区10种阔叶园林植物叶片结构及其抗旱性评价[J]. 西北植物学报,2012,32(10):2053-2060.Liu HR,Fen YZ,Wang DX,Cui HA. Drought resistance evaluation and leaf structures of ten species of broad-leaved ornamental plants in Yan'an urban area[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica,2012,32(10):2053-2060.
[16]	李扬汉. 植物学[M]. 第2版. 上海:科学技术出版社,1995.
[17]	朱栗琼,李吉跃,招礼军. 六种阔叶树叶片解剖结构特征及其耐旱性比较[J]. 广西植物,2007,27(3):431-434.Zhu LQ,Li JY,Zhao LJ. Comparison on leaf anatomical structures and drought resistance of six broad-leaved plant species[J]. Guihaia,2007,27(3):431-434.
[18]	石登红,陈训. 6种杜鹃花属(Rhododendron)植物叶片结构的研究[J]. 贵州科学,2005,23(3):39-45.Shi DH,Chen X. Study on the leaf blade structure of six species of Rhododendron[J]. Guizhou Science,2005,23(3):39-45.
[19]	薛智德,韩蕊莲,侯庆春,王胜琪,张振师.延安地区5种灌木叶旱性结构的解剖研究[J]. 西北植物学报,2004,24(7):1200-1206. Xue ZD,Han RL,Hou QC,Wang SQ,Zhang ZS. Anatomical study of xeromorphism of leaves in cutting for five brushes in Yan'an region[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica,2004,24(7):1200-1206.
[20]	任媛媛,刘艳萍,王念,罗晓雅,翟晓巧. 9种屋顶绿化阔叶植物叶片解剖结构与抗旱性的关系[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2014,38(4):64-68. Ren YY,Liu YP,Wang N,Luo XY,Zhai XQ. 〖JP+2〗The relationship between leaf anatomic structure and drought resistance of nine broadleaf plants[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition,2014,38(4):64-68.
[21]	蒋忠荣. 沙冬青抗旱性机理的探讨[J]. 中国沙漠,2000,20(1):70-74.Jiang ZR. Probe into drought-resisting mechanism of Ammopitanthus mongolicus (Maxim) Cheng F.〖KG-*6〗[J]. Journal of Desert Research,2000,20(1):70-74.
[22]	杜华栋,徐翠红,刘萍,焦菊英,苗芳. 陕北黄土高原优势植物叶片解剖结构的生态适应性[J]. 西北植物学报,2010,30(2):293-300.Du HD,Xu CH,Liu P,Jiao JY,Miao F. Foliar anatomical structures and ecological adaptabilities of dominant plants in the north Shaanxi loess plateau[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica,2010,30(2):293-300.