豆科复叶和单叶树种的光合-水分关系分析

赵万里; 张教林; 章永江; 曹坤芳

doi:10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2019.50628

豆科复叶和单叶树种的光合-水分关系分析

赵万里^1,2,3,
张教林¹,
章永江⁴,
曹坤芳^5, ,

1. 中国科学院西双版纳热带植物园, 云南勐腊 666303;
2. 中国科学技术大学生命科学学院, 合肥 230026;
3. 中国科学院华南植物园, 广州 510650;
4. School of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469, USA;
5. 广西大学林学院, 亚热带农业生物资源保护与利用国家重点实验室, 广西森林生态与保育重点实验室, 南宁 530004

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目（31800330，31870385，31470469）；广东省自然科学基金项目（2018A030310386）。

详细信息

作者简介:
赵万里(1986-),男,博士后,研究方向为植物生理生态(E-mail:sdlyzhwl@163.com)。

通讯作者:
曹坤芳,E-mail:kunfangcao@gxu.edu.cn

中图分类号: Q945.17
计量
- 文章访问数: 699
- HTML全文浏览量: 2
- PDF下载量: 605
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-01-27
- 网络出版日期: 2022-10-31
- 发布日期: 2019-10-27

Analysis of photosynthesis-water relationship between simple- and compound-leafed leguminous trees

1. Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla, Yunnan 666303, China;
2. School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China;
3. South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China;
4. School of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469, USA;
5. Plant Ecophysiology and Evolution Group, State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Conservation, College of Forestry, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China

Funds:

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31800330,31870385, 31470469) and Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2018A030310386).

摘要

摘要: 以豆科（Fabaceae）11个复叶树种和6个单叶树种为材料，测定他们的气孔导度、叶片水力导度、水势、相对含水量等指标，分析叶型对枝叶光合水分关系的影响。结果显示，复叶树种正午叶轴水势（-0.91 MPa）与单叶树种正午枝条水势（-0.88 MPa）间无显著差异，但正午枝条水势（-0.60 MPa）显著高于单叶树种。复叶树种正午气孔导度降低的百分比（55.3%）显著高于单叶树种（34.1%）。叶片、叶轴和枝条正午水势两两之间均显著正相关，但与正午气孔导度之间均不存在相关性。本研究中，17个树种的正午叶片水力导度与气孔导度间显著正相关（r=0.79，P<0.001），但他们与气孔导度降低百分比间呈负相关（r=-0.81，P<0.001），说明叶片导水率对日间气孔导度的维持具有重要作用。研究结果表明单叶和复叶树种在光合水分关系上存在明显差异，说明他们对环境条件具有不同的适应策略。
- 叶型 /
- 水力结构 /
- 光合作用 /
- 气孔导度 /
- 豆科
Abstract: To investigate the influence of leaf form on the relationship between water and photosynthesis of leaves and branches, we measured the stomatal conductance, leaf water conductance, water potential, and relative water content of 11 compound-leafed species and six simple-leafed species in Fabaceae. Results showed no significant differences in midday water potential between leaf rachises (-0.91 MPa) of compound-leafed trees and branches of simple-leafed trees (-0.88 MPa). However, the midday water potential of the branches of compound-leafed trees (-0.60 MPa) was significantly higher than that of simple-leafed trees. The percent decrease in midday stomatal conductance of compound-leafed trees was significantly higher than that of simple-leafed trees (55.3% vs. 34.1%). We found significantly positive correlations between leaf and stem midday water potentials in all 17 species, and between the rachis and stem midday water potentials in the 11 compound-leafed species. There was no correlation between midday water potential of leaflets, leaf rachises, and branches and midday stomatal conductance. There was a significant positive correlation between leaf hydraulic conductance and midday stomatal conductance across the 17 species (r=0.79, P<0.001), and a significant negative correlation between leaf hydraulic conductance and percent decrease in midday stomatal conductance (r=-0.81, P<0.001), indicating the important role of leaf hydraulic conductance in maintaining diurnal stomatal conductance. There were significant differences in the photosynthesis-water relationship among simple-and compound-leafed tree species, reflecting their different adaptive strategies to environmental conditions.
- Leaf form /
- Hydraulic architecture /
- Photosynthesis /
- Stomatal conductance /
- Fabaceae

HTML全文

参考文献(42)

[1]	Bucci SJ, Scholz FG, Goldstein G, Meinzer FC, Sternberg L. Dynamic changes in hydraulic conductivity in pe-tioles of two savanna tree species:factors and mechanisms contributing to the refilling of embolized vessels[J]. Plant Cell Environ, 2003, 26(10):1633-1645.
[2]	Xiong D, Douthe C, Flexas J. Differential coordination of stomatal conductance, mesophyll conductance, and leaf hydraulic conductance in response to changing light across species[J]. Plant Cell Environ, 2018, 41(2):436-450.
[3]	Brodribb TJ, Skelton RP, Mcadam SA, Bienaimé D, Lucani CJ, Marmottant P. Visual quantification of embolism reveals leaf vulnerability to hydraulic failure[J]. New Phytol, 2016, 209(4):1403-1409.
[4]	Anderegg WRL, Kane JM, Anderegg LDL. Consequences of wide-spread tree mortality triggered by drought and temperature stress[J]. Nat Clim Change, 2013, 3(1):30-36.
[5]	Zhang YJ, Meinzer FC, Qi JH, Goldstein G, Cao KF. Midday stomatal conductance is more related to stem rather than leaf water status in subtropical deciduous and evergreen broadleaf trees[J]. Plant Cell Environ, 2013, 36(1):149-158.
[6]	Conklin PA, Strable J, Li S, Scanlon MJ. On the mechanisms of development in monocot and eudicot leaves[J]. New Phytol, 2019, 221(2):706-724.
[7]	Efroni I, Eshed Y, Lifschitz E. Morphogenesis of simple and compound leaves:a critical review[J]. Plant Cell, 2010, 22(4):1019-1032.
[8]	Sinha N. Simple and compound leaves:reduction or multiplication?[J]. Trends Plant Sci,1997, 2(10):396-402.
[9]	Bar M, Ori N. Compound leaf development in model plant species[J]. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2015, 23:61-69.
[10]	Gurevitch J, Schuepp PH. Boundary layer properties of highly dissected leaves:an investigation using an electrochemical fluid tunnel[J]. Plant Cell Environ, 1990, 13(8):783-792.
[11]	Lechuga V, Carraro V, Vinegla B, Antonio Carreira J, Carlos Linares J. Managing drought-sensitive forests under global change. Low competition enhances long-term growth and water uptake in Abies pinsapo[J]. For Ecol Manage, 2017, 406:72-82.
[12]	Koutroulis AG. Dryland changes under different levels of global warming[J]. Sci Total Environ, 2019, 655:482-511.
[13]	Gonzalez-Zeas D, Erazo B, Lloret P, de Bievre B, Steinschneider S, Dangles O. Linking global climate change to local water availability:Limitations and prospects for a tropical mountain watershed[J]. Sci Total Environment, 2019, 650:2577-2586.
[14]	Ikeuchi M, Igarashi H, Okada K, Tsukaya H. Acropetal leaflet initiation of Eschscholzia californica is achieved by constant spacing of leaflets and differential growth of leaf[J]. Planta, 2014, 240(1):125-135.
[15]	Liu YY, Song J, Wang M, Li N, Niu CY, Hao GY. Coordination of xylem hydraulics and stomatal regulation in kee-ping the integrity of xylem water transport in shoots of two compound-leaved tree species[J]. Tree Physiol, 2015, 35(12):1333-1342.
[16]	Zhao WL, Siddiq Z, Fu PL, Zhang JL, Cao KF. Stable stomatal number per minor vein length indicates the coordination between leaf water supply and demand in three leguminous species[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7:2211.
[17]	Song J, Yang D, Niu CY, Zhang WW, Wang M, Hao GY. Correlation between leaf size and hydraulic architecture in five compound-leaved tree species of a temperate forest in NE China[J]. For Ecol Manage, 2018, 418:63-72.
[18]	Tyree MT, Sperry JS. Vulnerability to cavitation and embolism[J]. Plant Physiol, 1989, 40:19-38.
[19]	Chen YJ, Schnitzer SA, Zhang YJ, Fan ZX, Goldstein G, et al. Physiological regulation and efficient xylem water transport regulate diurnal water and carbon balances of tropical lianas[J]. Functional Ecol, 2017, 31(2):306-317.
[20]	Yang D, Goldstein G, Wang M, Zhang WW, Wang AY, et al. Microenvironment in the canopy rivals the host tree water status in controlling sap flow of a mistletoe species[J]. Tree Physiol, 2017, 37(4):501-510.
[21]	Lens F, Tixier A, Cochard H, Sperry JS, Jansen S, Herbette S. Embolism resistance as a key mechanism to understand adaptive plant strategies[J]. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2013, 16(3):287-292.
[22]	Scholz FG, Bucci SJ, Goldstein G. Strong hydraulic segmentation and leaf senescence due to dehydration may trigger die-back in Nothofagus dombeyi under severe droughts:a comparison with the co-occurring Austrocedrus chilensis[J]. Trees, 2014, 28(5):1475-1487.
[23]	Zolfaghar S, Villalobos-Vega R, Cleverly J, Eamus D. Co-ordination among leaf water relations and xylem vulnerabi-lity to embolism of Eucalyptus trees growing along a depth-to-groundwater gradient[J]. Tree physiol, 2015, 35(7):732-743.
[24]	Tyree MT, Ewers FW. The hydraulic architecture of trees and other woody-plants[J]. New Phytol, 1991, 119(3):345-360.
[25]	Cochard H, Coll L, Le Roux X, Améglio T. Unraveling the effects of plant hydraulics on stomatal closure during water stress in walnut[J]. Plant physiol, 2002, 128(1):282-290.
[26]	Tyree MT, Sperry JS. Do woody plants operate near the point of catastrophic xylem dysfunction caused by dyna-mic water stress? Answers from a model[J]. Plant Physiol, 1988, 88(3):574-580.
[27]	Schneider JV, Habersetzer J, Rabenstein R, Wesenberg J, Wesche K, Zizka G. Water supply and demand remain coordinated during breakdown of the global scaling relationship between leaf size and major vein density[J]. New Phytol, 2017, 214(1):473-486.
[28]	Scoffoni C, Chatelet DS, Pasquet-kok J, Rawls M, Donoghue MJ, et al. Hydraulic basis for the evolution of photosynthetic productivity[J]. Nat Plants, 2016, 2(6):16072.
[29]	Meinzer FC, Johnson DM, Lachenbruch B, McCulloh KA, Woodruff DR. Xylem hydraulic safety margins in woody plants:coordination of stomatal control of xylem tension with hydraulic capacitance[J]. Funct Ecol, 2009, 23(5):922-930.
[30]	Bucci SJ, Scholz FG, Campanello PI, Montti L, Jimenez-Castillo M, et al. Hydraulic differences along the water transport system of South American Nothofagus species:do leaves protect the stem functionality?[J]. Tree Phy-siol, 2012, 32(7):880-893.
[31]	Zhang WW, Wang M, Wang AY, Yin XH, Feng ZZ, Hao GY. Elevated ozone concentration decreases whole-plant hydraulic conductance and disturbs water use regulation in soybean plants[J]. Physiol Plant, 2018, 163(2):183-195.
[32]	Scoffoni C, Albuquerque C, Cochard H, Buckley TN, Fletcher LR, Caringella MA, et al. The causes of leaf hydraulic vulnerability and its influence on gas exchange in Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. Plant Physiol, 2018, 178(4):1584-1601.
[33]	Cirocco RM, Facelli JM, Watling JR. High water availability increases the negative impact of a native hemiparasite on its non-native host[J]. J Exp Bot, 2016, 67(5):1567-1575.
[34]	Champagne CE, Goliber TE, Wojciechowski MF, Mei RW, Townsley BT, et al. Compound leaf development and evolution in the legumes[J]. Plant Cell, 2007, 19:3369-3378.
[35]	中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会. 中国植物志[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 1993.
[36]	Chen JW, Zhang Q, Li XS, Cao KF. Gas exchange and hydraulics in seedlings of Heveabrasiliensis during water stress and recovery[J]. Tree Physiol, 2010, 30(7):876-885.
[37]	Champagne C, Sinha N. Compound leaves:equal to the sum of their parts?[J] Development, 2004, 131(18):4401-4412.
[38]	Wang Q, Song Z, Chen Y, Shen S, Li Z. Leaves and fruits of Bauhinia (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, Cercideae) from the Oligocene Ningming Formation of Guangxi, south China and their biogeographic implications[J]. BMC Evol Biol, 2014, 14:88.
[39]	Brodribb TJ, Cochard H. Hydraulic failure defines the recovery and point of death in water-stressed conifers[J]. Plant Physiol, 2009, 149(1):575-584.
[40]	Koch GW, Amthor JS, Goulden ML. Diurnal patterns of leaf photosynthesis, conductance and water potential at the top of a lowland rainforest in Cameroon:Measurements from the Radeu des Cimes[J]. Tree Physiol, 1994, 14(4):347-360.
[41]	Tucci MLS, Erismann NM, Machado EC, Ribeiro R. Diurnal and seasonal variation in photosynthesis of peach palms grown under subtropical conditions[J]. Photosynthetica, 2010, 48(3):421-429.
[42]	Sack L, Dietrich EM, Streeter CM, Sanchez-Gomez D, Holbrook NM. Leaf palmate venation and vascular redundancy confer tolerance of hydraulic disruption[J]. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA, 2008, 105(5):1567-1572.

施引文献(7)

期刊类型引用(2)

1.	刘文鑫，陈志成，代永欣，万贤崇. 水通道蛋白PIP1基因过表达杨树的光合生理过程对干旱和复水的响应. 林业科学. 2020(02): 69-78 . 百度学术
2.	温婷，张露，程子珊，朱博，陈伏生，易敏，谌梦云，李响. 鲜食枣‘麻姑1号’枣吊光合及叶绿素荧光特性. 经济林研究. 2020(04): 177-183+245 . 百度学术