子莲新品种‘武植子莲1号’和‘武植子莲2号’产量与营养品质分析

胡裕凤; 杨美; 刘艳玲; 邓显豹; 徐立铭; 杨东

doi:10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2019.50644

子莲新品种‘武植子莲1号’和‘武植子莲2号’产量与营养品质分析

胡裕凤^1,2,3,
杨美^1,2,
刘艳玲^1,2,
邓显豹^1,2,
徐立铭^1,2,
杨东^1,2, ,

1. 中国科学院武汉植物园, 中国科学院植物种质创新与特色农业重点实验室, 武汉 430074;
2. 中国科学院核心植物园, 资源植物学协同中心, 中国科学院, 武汉 430074;
3. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049

基金项目:

中国科学院武汉植物园科研骨干人才计划（Y655271Z01）；中国科学院青年创新促进会项目（2017390）；国家自然科学基金项目（31872136）。

详细信息

作者简介:
胡裕凤(1994-),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为植物学(E-mail:huyufeng16@mails.ucas.ac.cn)。

通讯作者:
杨东,E-mail:yangdong@wbgcas.cn

中图分类号: Q945.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 769
- HTML全文浏览量: 3
- PDF下载量: 616
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-02-20
- 网络出版日期: 2022-10-31
- 发布日期: 2019-10-27

Analysis and assessment of yield and nutritional quality of two new seed lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) cultivars ‘WBG_S1’ and ‘WBG_S2’

Hu Yu-Feng^1,2,3,
Yang Mei^1,2,
Liu Yan-Ling^1,2,
Deng Xian-Bao^1,2,
Xu Li-Ming^1,2,
Yang Dong^1,2, ,

1. Key Laboratory of Plant Germplasm Enhancement and Specialty Agriculture, Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430074, China;
2. Center of Economic Botany, Core Botanical Gardens, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430074, China;
3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Funds:

This work was supported by grants from the Backbone Talents Project of Wuhan Botanical Garden, CAS (Y655271Z01), Youth Innovation Promotion Association (2017390), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (31872136).

摘要

摘要: 对子莲（Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.）新品种‘武植子莲1号’和‘武植子莲2号’与其他12个主栽子莲品种的莲子产量和品质性状进行分析，并通过隶属函数分析法对他们的营养品质性状进行综合评价。结果显示：不同子莲品种的产量和营养品质性状差异显著，同一品种在不同发育时期莲子的可溶性糖和淀粉含量等营养指标差异较大；鲜莲子的可溶性糖含量显著高于成熟莲子，而蛋白质和淀粉含量显著低于成熟莲子。与12个主栽子莲品种相比，‘武植子莲1号’在产量上较为突出，成熟莲子的淀粉含量达52.15%，是生产天然淀粉的优良品种；‘武植子莲2号’鲜莲子的直链淀粉和支链淀粉含量低，可溶性糖含量达23.43%，适合鲜食。隶属函数分析结果表明，‘武植子莲1号’和‘武植子莲2号’的综合营养品质较好，具有很高的应用价值。
- 莲子 /
- 产量 /
- 营养品质 /
- 隶属函数分析
Abstract: To evaluate the application potential of two new seed lotus(Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.) cultivars (‘WBG_S1’ and ‘WBG_S2’), their seed yield and nutritional traits were compared with those of 12 main cultivated varieties. The nutritional trait indexes of different cultivars were subsequently evaluated by membership-function analysis. Results showed significant differences in seed yield and nutritional quality. There were significant differences in soluble sugar and starch content at different developmental stages in a single cultivar. Compared with the mature seeds, fresh seeds had significantly higher soluble sugar content but significantly lower protein and starch content (P<0.05). Generally, compared to the 12 main cultivated varieties, ‘WBG_S1’ and ‘WBG_S2’ had better yield and nutritional qualities. ‘WBG_S1’ exhibited high yield and high starch content in the mature seeds, reaching up to 52.15%. Thus, it is a good cultivar for producing natural starch products. ‘WBG_S2’ had low amylose and amylopectin content, but high soluble sugar content of up to 23.43% in fresh seeds. Thus, its seeds are suitable for fresh eating. In this study, membership-function analysis was used for the first time to evaluate the nutritional traits of lotus seeds and provides a scientific basis for the validation of lotus seed quality. This study also provides theoretical evidence for the application of the two new cultivars ‘WBG_S1’ and ‘WBG_S2’.
- Seeds of Nelumbo nucifera /
- Yield /
- Nutritional traits /
- Membership-Function analysis

HTML全文

参考文献(29)

[1]	The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. An update of the An-giosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants:APG IV[J]. Bot J Linn Soc, 2016, 181(1):1-20.
[2]	Guo HB. Cultivation of lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn. ssp. nucifera) and its utilization in China[J]. Genet Resour Crop Ev, 2009, 56(3):323-330.
[3]	王其超, 张言行. 中国荷花品种图志[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社, 2004.
[4]	Zhao YW. Chinese Aquatic Vegetables[M]. Beijing:Press of Chinese Agricultural University, 1999.
[5]	Wang L, Fu J, Li M, Fragner L, Weckwerth W, Yang P. Metabolomic and proteomic profiles reveal the dynamics of primary metabolism during seed development of lotus (Nelumbo nucifera)[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2016, 7:750.
[6]	SZ. The analysis of lotus and its processing[J]. Henan Agric, 2009, 56(3):25-26.
[7]	罗银华. 子莲新品种建选17号的选育[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2005, 1(Z1):107-108. Luo YH. A new seed lotus variety:‘Jianxuan No.17’[J]. China Vegetables, 2005, 1(Z1):107-108.
[8]	杨良波, 张香莲, 邹东旺, 唐纪平, 谢克强, 等. 子莲新品种京广2号的选育[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2010(14):38-39.
[9]	朱红莲, 柯卫东, 黄来春, 刘玉平, 李明华. 武汉地区子莲品种比较试验[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2017(18):102-104. Zhu HL, Ke WD, Huang LC, Liu YP, Li MH. Comparison experiment of seed lotus varieties in Wuhan area[J]. Journal of Changjiang Vegetables, 2017(18):102-104.
[10]	林国清, 傅跃进, 柳红芳, 叶胜平. 子莲新品种"十里荷1号"特征特性及其高产栽培技术[J]. 上海农业科技, 2008(6):91-92.
[11]	郑宝东, 郑金贵, 曾绍校. 我国主要莲子品种营养成分的分析[J]. 营养学报, 2003, 25(2):153-156. Zheng BD, Zheng JG, Zeng SJ. Analysis of the nutritional composition in Chinese main lotus seed varieties[J]. Acta Nutrimenta Sinica, 2003, 25(2):153-156.
[12]	刘星星, 杜雨芊, 方菲菲, 黄学勇, 罗丽萍. 莲子贮藏过程中可溶性糖的变化规律[J]. 食品与机械, 2015, 31(3):154-157. Liu XX, Du YQ, Fang FF, Huang XY, Luo LP. Changes of soluble sugar in lotus seeds in storage by HPLC:refractive index detection[J]. Food and Machinery, 2015, 31(3):154-157.
[13]	柯卫东, 李峰. 莲种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2005.
[14]	薛应龙, 夏镇澳. 植物生理学实验手册[M]. 上海:上海科学技术出版社, 1985.
[15]	徐昌杰, 陈文峻. 淀粉含量测定的一种简便方法:碘显色法[J]. 生物技术, 1998(2):41-43. Xu CJ, Chen WJ. A simple method for determining the content of starch:iodine colorimetry[J]. Biotechnology, 1998(2):41-43.
[16]	李娟, 张耀庭. 应用考马斯亮蓝法测定总蛋白含量[J]. 中国生物制品学杂志, 2000, 13(2):118-120.
[17]	吕群金, 衣杰荣, 丁勇. Folin-Ciocalteu比色法测定杨桃的多酚含量[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2009(7):99-101. Lü QJ, Yi JR, Ding Y. Determination of polyphenol in carambola by Folin-Ciocalteu colorimetry[J]. Hunan Agricultural Sciences, 2009(7):99-101.
[18]	董志刚, 程智慧. 番茄品种资源芽苗期和幼苗期的耐盐性及耐盐指标评价[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(3):1348-1355. Dong ZG, Cheng ZH. Salt tolerance and assessment of salt tolerance indices if tomato varieties in sprout stage and seedling stage[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(3):1348-1355.
[19]	杨湘虹, 吴湖龙, 刘乐承. 子莲的研究及应用进展[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2015(22):30-33. Yang XH, Wu HL, Liu LC. Research progress of aquatic vegetable nutrition and medicinal value[J]. Journal of Changjiang Vegetables, 2015(22):30-33.
[20]	朱红莲, 柯卫东, 刘玉平, 彭静, 黄来春, 周凯. 子莲主要农艺性状与产量的相关及通径分析[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2014, 1(3):41-46. Zhu HL, Ke WD, Liu YP, Peng J, Huang LC, Zhou K. Correlation and path analysis of main agronomic characters and yield of seed lotus[J]. China Vegetables, 2014, 1(3):41-46.
[21]	罗银华. 子莲新品种‘建选35号’的选育[J]. 中国园艺文摘, 2012(4):30-31.
[22]	申建波, 毛达如. 植物营养研究方法[M]. 北京:北京农业大学出版社, 1994.
[23]	谢黎虹, 罗炬, 唐绍清, 陈能, 焦桂爱, 等. 蛋白质影响水稻米饭食味品质的机制[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2013, 27(1):91-96. Xie LH, Luo J, Tang SQ, Chen N, Jiao GA, et al. Protein affect rice eating quality properties and its mechanism[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2013, 27(1):91-96.
[24]	李旭, 毛艇, 张睿, 王宇, 隋新, 等. 水稻收获时期对稻米淀粉RVA特性和食味品质的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2014, 42(4):55-57. Li X, Mao T, Zhang R, Wang Y, Sui X, et al. Effects of harvesting rice by stages on rice RVA characteristics and eating quality[J]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 42(4):55-57.
[25]	刘夫国, 马翠翠, 王迪, 高彦祥. 蛋白质与多酚相互作用研究进展[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2016, 42(2):282-288. Liu FG, Ma CC, Wang D, Gao YX. Recent research progress on interaction between polyphenols and proteins[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2016, 42(2):282-288.
[26]	郑宝东. 中国莲子(Nympheaceae Nelumbo Adans)种质资源主要品质的研究与应用[D]. 福州:福建农林大学, 2004.
[27]	文国宏, 李高峰, 李建武, 张荣, 马胜, 贾小霞. 陇薯系列马铃薯品种营养品质评价及相关性分析[J]. 核农学报, 2018, 32(11):2162-2169. Wen GH, Li GF, Li JW, Zhang R, Ma S, Jia XX. Nutrition quality evaluation and correlation analysis of Longshu potato varieties named with series[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 32(11):2162-2169.
[28]	罗海玲, 龚明霞, 周芸伊, 马俊, 何龙飞. 利用隶属函数法对山药种质资源品质和产量进行综合评价[J]. 西南农业学报, 2018, 31(5):911-916. Luo HL, Gong MX, Zhou YY, Ma J, He LF. Comprehensive analysis on quality and yield of yam germplasm resources by membership function method[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 31(5):911-916.
[29]	王绍辉, 杨瑞, 赵金芳, 陈帝芹, 徐利林. 不同萝卜品种几个品质性状的评价分析[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2006(4):22-23.

施引文献(14)

期刊类型引用(10)

1.	叶丽芳，张逸凡，张连虎，林桠春，郑兴汶，崔汝强，况卫刚. 莲腐败病菌遗传转化体系的构建. 植物保护. 2024(02): 211-218 . 百度学术
2.	傅阳阳，王思瑶，刘沛英，黄安琪，舒东膂，李炎林，田代科. 39份子莲资源的营养品质分析. 湖南农业科学. 2024(06): 21-27 . 百度学术
3.	杨银爱，郜海燕，牛犇，陈杭君. 基于电子舌对不同品种鲜莲子滋味成分的分析. 食品工业科技. 2023(24): 319-326 . 百度学术
4.	朱丹丹，唐记平，刘冬碧，裴佳晨，朱建强，杨良波，揭志辉，郑兴汶，张志毅，程子珍. 氮磷钾镁硼肥对子莲产量形成的影响. 中国土壤与肥料. 2023(10): 160-168 . 百度学术
5.	吕春发，严锐，陈杭君，杨银爱. 子莲保鲜加工技术研究进展. 浙江农业科学. 2022(08): 1829-1832 . 百度学术
6.	杨东，刘艳玲，邓显豹，孙恒，刘娟，杨美. 莲花期调控研究进展. 植物科学学报. 2022(04): 584-592 . 本站查看
7.	任朝辉，陈兴侣，田浩，廖卫琴，周安韦，童琳，田欢. 不同朝天椒种质资源品质和产量的综合评价. 热带作物学报. 2021(08): 2191-2198 . 百度学术
8.	常宝亮，刘凤军，姜红卫，刘光杨，吴春满，金奇江，王彦杰，徐迎春. 9个子莲品种观赏性和莲子品质的综合评价. 植物资源与环境学报. 2021(06): 58-63 . 百度学术
9.	齐欢欢，祖明艳，杨平仿. 莲子食用价值研究进展. 植物科学学报. 2020(05): 716-722 . 本站查看
10.	胡小璇，江尚焘，安祥瑞，吴文利，谢昶琰，沈宗专，王蓓蓓，魏志远，徐阳春，董彩霞，沈其荣. 有机无机肥配施对芒果产量与品质及经济效益的影响. 南京农业大学学报. 2020(06): 1107-1115 . 百度学术