Factor analysis and comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality of ‘Jinyan’ kiwifruit (Actinidia eriantha×Actinidia chinensis)
-
摘要: 以四川省53家果园的猕猴桃（Actinidia）品种‘金艳’（A.eriantha×A.chinensis ‘Jinyan’）果实为材料，测定其软熟时的单果重、色彩角、硬度、可溶性固形物含量、总糖含量、总酸含量、糖酸比、软熟率、病果率及采收时的干物质含量等10个品质指标，并进行主成分分析，对‘金艳’果实品质评价中的主要影响因子以及适合的果实品质评价方法进行分析。结果显示：按方差贡献率大小前6个成分的特征根大于0.8，累计方差贡献率为88.57%；综合分值排名前3位的果园分别为DJY1、GY4和GY1。主成分分析法提取并分析了前6个贡献率较高的主成分，结果表明该方法适合‘金艳’果实以采收干物质、软熟色彩角、硬度、可溶性固形物含量、总糖、糖酸比等为基础的综合果实品质评价。Abstract: Ten indices of fruit quality of the ‘Jinyan’ kiwifruit (Actinidia eriantha ×A. chinensis) were measured from 53 orchards in Sichuan Province, China, and included fruit weight, hue angle, firmness, soluble solids content, dry matter, total sugar, total acid, sugar-acid ratio, ripening rate, and diseased fruit rate. These indices were analyzed by principal component analysis (PCA) to identify the major factors and establish a fruit quality evaluation system for ‘Jinyan’. Results showed that the first six principal components (PC1-PC6) all had characteristic roots of more than 0.8 and showed a cumulative contribution proportion of 88.57%. The top three orchards with the highest comprehensive scores were DJY1, GY4, and GY1, respectively. Thus, PCA was suitable for the comprehensive quality evaluation of ‘Jinyan’ and provided important information for cultivation, management, and quality improvement.
-
Keywords:
- ‘Jinyan’ /
- Fruit quality /
- Comprehensive evaluation /
- Principal component analysis
-
-
[1] Zhong CH, Wang SM, Jiang ZW, Huang HW. ‘Jinyan’, an interspecific hybrid kiwifruit with brilliant yellow flesh and good storage quality[J]. HortScience, 2012, 47(8):1187-1190.
[2] Abbott JA. Quality measurement of fruits and vegetables[J]. Postharvest Biol Technol, 1999, 15(3):207-225.
[3] Liu HF, Wu BH, Fan PG, Li SH, Li LS. Sugar and acid concentrations in 98 grape cultivars analyzed by principal component analysis[J]. J Agric Food Chem, 2006, 86(10):1526-1536.
[4] Ruiz D, Egea J. Phenotypic diversity and relationships of fruit quality traits in apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) germplasm[J]. Euphytica, 2008, 163(1):143-158.
[5] Rajkumar P, Wang N, EImasry G, Raghavan GSV, Gariepy Y. Studies on banana fruit quality and maturity stages using hyperspectral imaging[J]. J Food Eng, 2012, 108(1):194-200.
[6] Silva BM, Andrade PB, Martins RC, Valentao P, Ferreres F, et al. Quince (Cydonia oblonga Miller) fruit characte-rization using principal component analysis[J]. J Agr Food Chem, 2005, 53(1):111-122.
[7] 钟彩虹, 李大卫, 韩飞, 刘小莉, 张鹏, 黄宏文. 猕猴桃品种果实性状特征和主成分分析研究[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2016, 17(1):92-99. Zhong CH, Li DW, Han F, Liu XL, Zhang P, Huang HW. Fruit characters and principal component analysis of diffe-rent ploidy of kiwifruit cultivars (Actinidia Chinensis Planch.)[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2016, 17(1):92-99.
[8] 牟红梅, 于强, 李庆余, 王义菊, 姜福东, 等. 基于主成分分析的烟台地区西洋梨果实品质综合评价[J]. 果树学报, 2019, 36(8):1084-1092. Mu HM, Yu Q, Li QY, Wang YJ, Jiang FD, et al. Synthe-tic evaluation of fruit quality of common pears (Pyrus communis L.) based on principal component analysis in Yantai areas[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2019, 36(8):1084-1092.
[9] 沈碧薇, 魏灵珠, 崔鹏飞, 程建徽, 向江, 吴江. 不同砧木对‘瑞都红玉’葡萄生长结果与果实品质的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2020, 37(3):350-361. Shen BW, Wei LZ, Cui PF, Cheng JH, Xiang J, Wu J. Effects of different rootstocks on the growth and berry quality in ‘Ruidu Hongyu’ grapevines[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2020, 37(3):350-361.
[10] 贺娜, 张艳丽, 宁德鲁, 耿树香. 云南主栽油橄榄品种果实品质综合评价. 西南林业大学学报[J]. 2019, 38(2):181-184. He N, Zhang YL, Ning DL, Gen SX. Comprehensive eva-luation on fruit quality of main olive varieties in Yunnan[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2018, 38(2):181-184.
[11] 曲雪艳, 郎彬彬, 钟敏, 朱博, 陶俊杰, 等. 野生毛花猕猴桃果实品质主成分分析及综合评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(1):92-96. Qu XY, Lang BB, Zhong M, Zhu B, Tao JJ, et al. Principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality of Actinidia eriantha[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(1):92-96.
[12] 刘科鹏, 黄春辉, 冷建华, 陈葵, 严玉平, 等. ‘金魁’猕猴桃果实品质的主成分分析与综合评价[J]. 果树学报, 2012, 29(5):867-871. Liu KP, Huang CH, Leng JH, Chen K, Yan YP, et al. Principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation of the fruit quality of ‘Jinkui’ kiwifruit[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2012, 29(5):867-871.
[13] 陈璐, 廖光联, 杨聪, 黄春辉, 钟敏, 等. 基于主成分分析与聚类分析的黄肉猕猴桃品种(系)主要果实性状的综合评价[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2018, 40(6):1231-1240. Chen L, Liao GL, Yang C, Huang CH, Zhong M, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of main fruit characters of yellow flesh kiwifruit cultivars (strains) based on principal component analysis and cluster analysis[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2018, 40(6):1231-1240.
[14] 陈美艳, 赵婷婷, 韩飞, 钟彩虹. 西峡县域内"金桃"猕猴桃的果实品质研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2018, 46(35):180-182. Chen MY, Zhao TT, Han F, Zhong CH. Study on the fruit quality of ‘Jintao’ kiwifruit in Xixia county[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46(35):180-182.
[15] 曹建康, 姜微波, 赵玉梅. 果蔬采后生理化学实验指导[M]. 北京:中国轻工业出版社, 2007. [16] 马庆华, 李永红, 梁丽松, 李琴, 王海, 等. 冬枣优良单株果实品质的因子分析与综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(12):2491-2499. Ma QH, Li YH, Liang LS, Li Q, Wang H, et al. Factor analysis and synthetical evaluation of the fruit quality of Dongzao (Ziziphus jujubaMill. ‘Dongzao’) advanced selections[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(12):2491-2499.
[17] 聂继云, 张红军, 马智勇, 杨振锋, 李静. 聚类分析在我国果树研究中的应用及问题分析[J]. 果树科学, 2000, 17(2):128-130. Nie JY, Zhang HJ, Ma ZY, Yang ZF, Li J. The application of cluster analysis in the fruit research in China and its problems[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2000, 17(2):128-130.
[18] 张海英, 韩涛, 王有年, 李丽萍. 桃果实品质评价因子的选择[J]. 农业工程学报, 2006, 22(8):235-239. Zhang HY, Han T, Wang YN, Li LP. Selection of factors for evaluating peach (Prunus persica) fruit quality[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2006, 22(8):235-239.
[19] Kurtanjek Z, Horvat D, Magdic D, Drezner G. Factor analysis and modelling for rapid quality assessment of croatian wheat cultivars with different gluten characteristics[J]. Food Sci Biotechnol, 2008, 46(3):270-277.
[20] 石胜友, 武红霞, 王松标, 姚全胜, 刘丽琴, 等. 杧果种质果实品质性状多样性分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2011, 38(5):840-848. Shi SY, Wu HX, Wang SB, Yao QS, Liu LQ, et al. Fruit quality diversity of mango (Mangifera indica L.) germplasm[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2011, 38(5):840-848.
[21] 田瑞, 胡红菊, 杨晓平, 张靖国, 陈启亮. 梨果实品质评价因子的选择[J]. 长江大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 6(3):8-11. Tian R, Hu HJ, Yang XP, Zhang JG, Chen QL. Selection of factors for evaluating pear fruit quality[J]. Journal of Yangtze University(Natural Science Edition), 2009, 6(3):8-11.
[22] 董月菊, 张玉刚, 梁美霞, 戴洪义. 苹果果实品质主要评价指标的选择[J]. 华北农学报, 2011, 26(S1):74-79. Dong YJ, Zhang YG, Liang MX, Dai HY. Selection of main indexes for evaluating apple fruit quality[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2011, 26(S1):74-79.
[23] Azodanlou R, Darbellay C, Luisier JL, Villettaz JC, Amadò R. Development of a model for quality assessment of tomatoes and apricots[J]. LWT-Food Sci and Technol, 2003, 36(2):223-233.
[24] 秦红艳, 许培磊, 艾军, 刘迎雪, 范书田, 等. 软枣猕猴桃种质资源果实品质、表型性状多样性及主成分分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(1):160-165. Qin HY, Xu PL, Ai J, Liu YX, Fan ST, et al. Diversity of fruit quality and phenotypic traits of Actinidia arguta Planch. germplasm resources and their principal component analysis[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin[J]. 2015, 31(1):160-165.
[25] Nishiyama I, Yamashita Y, Yamanaka M, Shimohashi A, Fukuda T, Oota T. Varietal difference in vitamin C content in the fruit of kiwifruit and other Actinidia species[J]. J Agric Food Chem, 2004, 52(17):5472-5475.
[26] Huang HW, Ferguson AR. Genetic resources of kiwifruit:domestication and breeding[M]//Janick J, ed. Horticultural Reviews. New Jersey:John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2007.
[27] Lee SK, Kader AA. Preharvest and postharvest factors influencing vitamin C content of horticultural crops[J]. Postharvest Biol Technol, 2000, 20(3):207-220.
-
期刊类型引用(24)
1. 曲梦君，雷训，赵航，朱威霖，邵帅，薛玉洁，王健铭，李景文，尚策. 额尔齐斯河流域河谷林种子植物区系特征研究. 植物科学学报. 2025(01): 41-51 . 
本站查看
2. 田奥磊，布热比衣木·吾斯曼，玉米提·哈力克，王新英，刘茂秀. 洪水漫溢对林窗微环境时空差异的影响——以塔里木河中游荒漠河岸林为例. 生态学报. 2024(02): 770-779 . 百度学术
3. 蒲发光，王瑞，谢宛，左睿涛，张贝贝，周美生，刘华. 安徽天马国家级自然保护区栎类群落优势种的种群结构特征. 安徽林业科技. 2024(01): 39-45 . 百度学术
4. 郑刚，王楚含. 塔里木河干流漫溢后植被群落、盖度变化特征分析研究. 云南水力发电. 2024(03): 1-3+8 . 百度学术
5. 潘登，郁培义. 海南保梅岭自然保护区种子植物资源调查研究. 热带林业. 2023(01): 76-80 . 百度学术
6. 杨桂梅，杨钰华，欧阳学军，贺握权，黄柳菁. 鼎湖山野生植物物种组成和功能性状特征. 河南科技学院学报(自然科学版). 2023(02): 35-43 . 百度学术
7. 余常团，肖欢，范春雨，张春雨，赵秀海，匡文浓，陈贝贝. 青海省东北部灌丛群落β多样性组分分解及其驱动因素. 应用与环境生物学报. 2023(03): 515-522 . 百度学术
8. 林伟通，邓华格，杨奇青，徐益成. 广东罗浮山省级自然保护区紫花红豆群落特征分析. 惠州学院学报. 2023(03): 7-11 . 百度学术
9. 杨锋，郭建英，赵学勇，李锦荣，杨雅楠. 内蒙古荒漠区药用种子植物区系研究. 草原与草坪. 2023(05): 91-98 . 百度学术
10. 李尚玉，刘超，徐雪蕾，李树明，曹兵. 宁夏罗山国家级自然保护区主要森林类型群落结构特征与植物物种多样性. 农业科学研究. 2023(04): 81-86 . 百度学术
11. 许冬山，张柱森，邓泽伟，闫东明，杨进良，陈进，唐瑾暄，张中瑞. 基于空地一体调查的银瓶山森林公园银瓶嘴群落物种垂直分布格局研究. 林业与环境科学. 2023(06): 104-112 . 百度学术
12. 温云梦，张冬冬，王家强. 干旱胁迫对胡杨叶片色素及光谱特征影响的研究进展. 绿色科技. 2022(01): 6-10 . 百度学术
13. 梁燕飞，古文强，闫东明，卢曼，邓智文，韩东燕，陈煜明，张中瑞. 东莞市银瓶山森林公园润楠属植物群落特征研究. 林业与环境科学. 2022(01): 132-139 . 百度学术
14. 才仁加甫，曹彪，白云岗，刘旭辉，余其鹰，刘敏杰. 和田河沙漠段生态输水植被恢复遥感评价和植被变化驱动因素分析. 新疆农业科学. 2022(08): 2041-2050 . 百度学术
15. 康佳鹏，韩路. 塔河源荒漠河岸林灰胡杨与多枝柽柳种群空间格局与空间关联性. 中南林业科技大学学报. 2021(02): 123-132 . 百度学术
16. 付爱红，程勇，李卫红，朱成刚，陈亚鹏. 塔里木河下游生态输水对荒漠河岸林生态恢复力的影响. 干旱区地理. 2021(03): 620-628 . 百度学术
17. 康佳鹏，韩路，冯春晖，王海珍. 塔里木荒漠河岸林不同生境群落物种多度分布格局. 生物多样性. 2021(07): 875-886 . 百度学术
18. 周洪华，朱成刚，方功焕. 塔里木河上游荒漠河岸胡杨林树洞型空心树发生过程与形成机制. 生态学报. 2021(14): 5695-5702 . 百度学术
19. 田晓萍，占玉芳，马力，滕玉风，钱万建. 河西走廊沙漠人工林群落结构特征. 林业科技通讯. 2021(06): 35-39 . 百度学术
20. 张晓龙，周继华，来利明，郑元润. 黑河下游胡杨群落多样性沿河岸距离的变化特征. 生态环境学报. 2021(10): 1952-1960 . 百度学术
21. 古文强，梁燕飞，陈进，邓智文，温汉华，吴惠兰，陈国锋，张中瑞. 银瓶山森林公园润楠属植物群落多样性研究. 林业与环境科学. 2021(06): 176-181 . 百度学术
22. 刘艳萍，刘涛阳，朱中原. 塔里木盆地特有植物心叶水柏枝濒危原因调查. 安徽农业科学. 2020(16): 112-115 . 百度学术
23. 彭玉华，曾健，申文辉，何峰，郑威，何琴飞，欧芷阳. 九万山常绿阔叶林物种组成及空间结构特征分析. 中南林业科技大学学报. 2020(12): 17-25 . 百度学术
24. 王丽丽，范春楠，郑金萍，郭忠玲. 哈达岭山系森林群落维管束植物区系特征分析. 安徽农业科学. 2019(20): 128-131 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(10)
计量
- 文章访问数: 624
- HTML全文浏览量: 2
- PDF下载量: 536
- 被引次数: 34
下载:
