高级检索+

不同区域长柄扁桃抗旱性的研究

郭改改, 封斌, 麻保林, 井赵斌, 张应龙, 郭春会

郭改改, 封斌, 麻保林, 井赵斌, 张应龙, 郭春会. 不同区域长柄扁桃抗旱性的研究[J]. 植物科学学报, 2013, 31(4): 360-369. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1142.2013.40360
引用本文: 郭改改, 封斌, 麻保林, 井赵斌, 张应龙, 郭春会. 不同区域长柄扁桃抗旱性的研究[J]. 植物科学学报, 2013, 31(4): 360-369. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1142.2013.40360
GUO Gai-Gai, FENG Bin, MA Bao-Lin, JIN Zhao-Bin, ZHANG Ying-Long, GUO Chun-Hui. Studies on Drought Resistance of Different Regional Amygdalus pedunculata Pall.[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2013, 31(4): 360-369. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1142.2013.40360
Citation: GUO Gai-Gai, FENG Bin, MA Bao-Lin, JIN Zhao-Bin, ZHANG Ying-Long, GUO Chun-Hui. Studies on Drought Resistance of Different Regional Amygdalus pedunculata Pall.[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2013, 31(4): 360-369. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1142.2013.40360
郭改改, 封斌, 麻保林, 井赵斌, 张应龙, 郭春会. 不同区域长柄扁桃抗旱性的研究[J]. 植物科学学报, 2013, 31(4): 360-369. CSTR: 32231.14.SP.J.1142.2013.40360
引用本文: 郭改改, 封斌, 麻保林, 井赵斌, 张应龙, 郭春会. 不同区域长柄扁桃抗旱性的研究[J]. 植物科学学报, 2013, 31(4): 360-369. CSTR: 32231.14.SP.J.1142.2013.40360
GUO Gai-Gai, FENG Bin, MA Bao-Lin, JIN Zhao-Bin, ZHANG Ying-Long, GUO Chun-Hui. Studies on Drought Resistance of Different Regional Amygdalus pedunculata Pall.[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2013, 31(4): 360-369. CSTR: 32231.14.SP.J.1142.2013.40360
Citation: GUO Gai-Gai, FENG Bin, MA Bao-Lin, JIN Zhao-Bin, ZHANG Ying-Long, GUO Chun-Hui. Studies on Drought Resistance of Different Regional Amygdalus pedunculata Pall.[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2013, 31(4): 360-369. CSTR: 32231.14.SP.J.1142.2013.40360

不同区域长柄扁桃抗旱性的研究

基金项目: 国家林业局林业公益性行业科研专项(201104074);西北农林科技大学唐仲英育种专项。
详细信息
    作者简介:

    郭改改(1990-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事果树生理研究(E-mail:273054548@qq.com)。

    通讯作者:

    郭春会,E-mail:906832715@qq.com

  • 中图分类号: Q945.78

Studies on Drought Resistance of Different Regional Amygdalus pedunculata Pall.

  • 摘要: 以采自河北、乌审旗、榆阳、神木、固阳5个地区的一年生长柄扁桃(Amygdalus pedunculata Pall.)实生苗为试材,研究其叶片在水分胁迫下的解剖结构与生理生化特性,来确定其抗旱性强弱。结果表明:(1)水分胁迫后各地区长柄扁桃的叶片解剖结构存在显著性差异,并由隶属函数法对解剖结构综合分析得出这5个地区长柄扁桃的抗旱性顺序为:榆阳>神木>固阳>乌审旗>河北。(2)随着干旱时间的延长,各地区长柄扁桃的叶片相对含水量、质膜透性、丙二醛含量均呈上升趋势,且抗旱性弱的值越大,变化幅度也较大;SOD和POD活性、游离脯氨酸和可溶性蛋白含量均随胁迫的加强呈先升高后降低或直接降低的趋势,且抗旱性越强活性值或含量越高。(3)在干旱胁迫下Chl a和Chl b都呈先升高后降低的趋势,但Chl b对水分胁迫的反应较Chl a敏感;Car则呈下降趋势,其中榆阳和神木地区的长柄扁桃在胁迫40 d后光合色素含量均为最高。研究发现:长柄扁桃通过调整自身的叶片结构和各项生理生化特性来减缓水分胁迫带来的伤害,并由各项指标综合分析得出5个地区长柄扁桃的抗旱性顺序为:榆阳>神木>固阳>乌审旗>河北,为进一步的品种选育奠定了基础,并为长柄扁桃的产业化开发提供了理论依据。
    Abstract: Amygdalus pedunculata Pall. seedlings with one year of growth from Hebei,Wushenqi, Shenmu, Guyang and Yuyang regions were selected as test materials.We obtained leaf anatomical structure characteristics and physiological and biochemical characteristics under drought stress to determine drought resistance. Results showed that: (1) There were significant differences in leaf anatomical structures under water stress, and according to membership function, the sequence of drought resistance was Yuyang area>Shenmu area>Guyang area>Wushenqi area>Hebei area.(2) With the extension of stress time and degree of drought stress, leaf RWC, plasma membrane permeability and MDA showed an upward trend, and the change range of weak drought resistance was larger. Both SOD and POD activity, free proline and soluble protein content with the strengthening of stress increased first then decreased (later or directly), and the stronger the drought resistance the higher the activity or content.(3) Under water stress the contents of chlorophyll a and b also increased at first and then decreased, and the response of chlorophyll b to drought stress was more sensitive than chlorophyll a. But Car showed a downward trend, and among them Yuyang and Shenmu areas were highest after 40 days. By adjusting leaf structure, physiological and biochemical characteristics, A. pedunculata Pall. reduced the harm caused by water stress,and according to comprehensive analysis of the indicators, the sequence of drought resistance of the five regions A. pedunculata Pall.was Yuyang area>Shenmu area>Guyang area>Wushenqi area>Hebei area. This research lays a foundation for further breeding, and provides a theoretical basis for the industrialization development of Amygdalus pedunculata Pall.
  • [1] 苏贵兴,姚玉卿. 我国的野生扁桃资源[J].野生植物研究,1993(2):7-11.
    [2] 罗树伟,郭春会,张国庆, 张应龙.沙地植物长柄扁桃光合特性研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2010,38(1):125-132.
    [3] 李聪,李国平,陈俏, 白斌, 申烨华, 张应龙.长柄扁桃油脂肪酸成分分析[J].中国油脂, 2010, 35(4):77-79.
    [4] Chen J W, Zhang Q, Li X S, Cao K F. Gas exchange and hydraulics in seedlings of Hevea brasiliensis during water stress and recovery [J]. Tree Physiol, 2010,30(7):876-885.
    [5] Siam A M J, Radoglou K M, Noitsakis B, Smiris P. Differences in ecophysiological responses to summer drought between seedlings of three deciduous oak species [J]. Forest Ecol Manag, 2009, 258(1) : 35-42.
    [6] 高俊凤. 植物生理学实验技术[M].西安: 世界图书出版公司西安分公司,2000: 201-202.
    [7] 孙群,胡景江. 植物生理学研究技术[M].陕西杨凌: 西北农林科技大学出版社, 2006: 165-169.
    [8] 杨敏生,费保华,朱之悌. 白杨双交杂种无性系抗旱性鉴定指标分析[J].林业科学, 2002,38(6): 36-42.
    [9] 王跃进,杨亚州,张剑侠,潘学军,万怡震.中国葡萄属野生种及其种间F1代抗旱性鉴定初探[J].园艺学报, 2004,31(6): 711-714.
    [10] Hooijmaijers Cortwa. Membrane integrity, oxidative damage and chlorophyll fluorescence during dehydration of the thalloid liverwort Monoclea forsteri Hook. [J]. J Bryol, 2008, 30(3): 217-222.
    [11] 曹晶,姜卫兵,翁忙玲,姜武.夏秋季旱涝胁迫对红叶石楠光合特性的影响[J].园艺学报,2007,34(1):163-172.
    [12] Lima A L, DaMatta F M, Pinheiro H A, Totola M R, Loureiro M E. Photochemical responses and oxidative stress in two clones of Coffea canephora under water deficit conditions [J]. Environ Exp Bot, 2002, 47(3) : 239-247.
    [13] Sundar D, Perianayaguy B, Reddy A R. Localization of antioxidant enzymes in the cellular compartments of sorghum leaves [J]. Plant Growth Regul, 2004, 44(2) : 157-163.
    [14] Terzi R, Kadioglu A. Drought stress tolerance and the antioxidant enzyme system in Ctenanthe setosa[J]. Acta Biol Cracov Bot, 2006, 48(2):89-96.
    [15] 孙景宽,李田,夏江宝, 董波涛.干旱胁迫对沙枣幼苗根茎叶生长及光合色素的影响[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(1): 68-71.
    [16] 董建芳,李春红,刘果厚, 周世权, 苏亚拉图.内蒙古6种沙生柳树叶片解剖结构的抗旱性分析[J].中国沙漠, 2009,29(3): 480-484.
    [17] 孙志虎,王庆成.应用PV技术对北方4种阔叶树抗旱性的研究[J].林业科学, 2003,39(2): 34-38.
    [18] 郑国琦,张磊,郑国保,张源培,王俊,胡正海.不同灌水量对干旱区枸杞叶片结构、光合生理参数和产量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(11): 2806-2813.
    [19] Yordanov l, Velikova T, Tsonev V. Plant responses to drought, acclimation, and stress tolerance [J].Photosynthetica, 2000, 38(1):171-186.
    [20] 符亚儒,麻保林,王子玲,杨伟.陕北风沙区4种乡土树种适应干旱环境的特性及利用前景[J].中国沙漠,2005,5(3): 386-390.
    [21] 张继澍.植物生理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006.
    [22] 韩蕊莲,李丽霞,梁宗锁.干旱胁迫下沙棘叶片细胞膜透性与渗透调节物质研究[J]. 西北植物学报2003,23(1): 23-27.
    [23] 柯世省,杨敏文. 水分胁迫对云锦杜鹃抗氧化系统和脂类过氧化的影响[J]. 园艺学报,2007,34(5): 1217-2222.
    [24] Delatorre J, Pinto M, Cardemil L. Effects of water stress and high temperature on photosynthetic rates of two species of Prosopis [J]. J Photoch Photobio B, 2008, 92(2):67-76.
    [25] Griffiths H, Parry M A J. Plant responses to water stress [J]. Ann Bot, 2002, 89(7):801-802.
    [26] 徐坤,郑国生.水分胁迫对生姜光合作用及保护酶活性的影响[J].园艺学报,2000,27(1):47-51.
    [27] 潘瑞炽.植物生理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2004:296-298.
    [28] 严美玲,李向东,林英杰.苗期干旱胁迫对不同抗旱花生品种生理特性、产量和品质的影响[J].作物学报,2007,33(1): 113-119.
    [29] Clifford S C, Arndt S K, Corlett J E, Joshi S, Sankhla N, Popp M, Jones H G. The role of solute accumulation, osmotic adjustment and changes in cell wall elasticity in drought tolerance in Ziziphus mauritiana (Lamk.) [J]. J Exp Bot, 1998, 49(323):967-977.
    [30] Mittler R. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance [J].Trends Plant Sci, 2002, 7( 9) : 405-410.
    [31] 王俊刚,陈国昌,张承烈.水分胁迫对2种生态型芦苇(Phragmites communis)的可溶性蛋白含量、SOD、POD、CAT活性的影响[J].西北植物学报,2002,22(3):561-565.
    [32] 陈昕,徐宜凤,张振英.干旱胁迫下石灰花楸幼苗叶片的解剖结构和光合生理响应[J].西北植物学报, 2012,32(1):111-116.
    [33] Hilde W, Wim V C, Marc V M, Christian L, Heinrich S. Ozone, Sulfur dioxide, and ultraviolet B have similar effects on mRNA accumulation of antioxidant genes in Nicotiana plumbaginifolia L. [J]. Plant Physiol, 1994,106(3):1007-1014.
    [34] 姜卫兵,高光林,俞开锦, 汪良驹, 马凯.水分胁迫对果树光合作用及同化代谢的影响研究进展[J].果树学报, 2002,19(6): 416-420.
    [35] 朱金方,夏江宝,陆兆华,刘京涛,孙景宽.盐旱交叉胁迫对柽柳幼苗生长及生理生化特性的影响[J].西北植物学报, 2012,32(1):124-130.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1506
  • HTML全文浏览量:  2
  • PDF下载量:  1530
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2013-01-22
  • 修回日期:  2013-06-17
  • 发布日期:  2013-08-29

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回