Comparative study on the community characteristics and population dynamics of Bruguiera sexangula (Lour.) Poiret at different intertidal elevations in Dongzhaigang National Nature Reserve
-
摘要:
为了解不同生境下海莲(Bruguiera sexangula (Lour.) Poiret)的群落特征和种群动态变化,合理利用与保护现有红树资源,对海南东寨港国家级自然保护区不同潮位下海莲的群落特征、年龄结构、分布格局、静态生命表以及生存函数等进行了研究。结果显示:(1)海莲为群落优势树种,群落的物种多样性指数、均匀度指数以及林分密度随潮位升高逐渐增加,而海莲的重要值、胸径、树高以及冠幅随潮位升高逐渐降低;(2)海莲种群在空间上呈现聚集分布格局,不同潮位的龄级结构分布不同,低潮位种群为“凸”型而中高潮位种群为倒“J”型;(3)海莲种群的存活曲线在不同潮位上存在差异,低潮位植株死亡率在各龄级中相近,为Deevey-Ⅱ型,中高潮位植株死亡率在低龄级阶段高,在高龄级阶段相对稳定,为Deevey-Ⅲ型;(4)不同潮位海莲种群的生存率和累计死亡率函数平衡点均在幼苗阶段,第Ⅴ龄级后各潮位生存函数曲线的变化幅度变小。因此,不同潮位下海莲的群落特征和种群动态有明显差异。研究结果为该区域红树植物的保护及优化管理提供了重要的基础数据。
Abstract:Understanding how intertidal elevation influences the community characteristics and population dynamics of Bruguiera sexangula (Lour.) Poiret is essential for the effective conservation and sustainable management of mangrove ecosystems. This study investigated variations in community characteristics, age structure, spatial distribution pattern, static life-table parameters, and survival functions of B. sexangula along an intertidal gradient in the Hainan Dongzhaigang National Nature Reserve. Results showed the following key findings: (1) B. sexangula was the dominant species in the community. Species diversity, Pielou index, and stand density increased with increasing intertidal elevation, while the importance value, diameter at breast height, tree height, and crown width of B. sexangula decreased. (2) The spatial distribution pattern of B. sexangula exhibited significant clumping. The diameter distribution exhibited a convex-shaped pattern at low intertidal elevations and an inverted J-shaped pattern at both mid and high intertidal elevations. (3) Survival curves varied with intertidal elevation. Low intertidal zones exhibited a Deevey Type Ⅱ curve, while mid and high intertidal elevations showed Deevey Type Ⅲ curves. (4) The equilibrium points of survival and cumulative mortality functions occurred during the seedling stage across all intertidal elevations, and the magnitude of changes in the survival function curves at each intertidal elevation decreased after age Ⅴ. These findings demonstrate that intertidal elevation strongly affects the community characteristics and population dynamics of B. sexangula. This study provides critical baseline data for the protection and optimized management of mangrove ecosystems, particularly in regions experiencing dynamic intertidal changes.
-
2022年共有174位专家为《植物科学学报》认真审稿并及时返回意见,使期刊出版工作得以顺利进行。在此,衷心感谢各位审稿专家的大力支持和辛勤付出,向你们致以诚挚的谢意!在新的一年开端之际,祝各位专家身体健康!工作顺利!
白 洁 蔡传涛 蔡得田 蔡红梅 蔡 霞 操 瑜 曹洪麟 曹坤芳 曹丽雯 曾 驰 常学向 陈发兴 陈芳清 陈桂林 陈进明 陈军文 陈 丽 陈儒钢 陈思翀 陈 昕 陈有超 陈媛媛 成仿云 崔大方 崔现亮 戴 璨 戴锡玲 党海山 邓传远 邓红兵 邓显豹 丁 俊 范吉标 范亚文 方 庭 傅小鹏 高 磊 高微微 高亦珂 龚弘娟 龚燕兵 苟君波 谷 超 郭 亮 郭明全 郭起荣 郭屹立 韩月彭 何丙辉 何光源 何奇江 侯宏伟 胡光万 胡建斌 胡 晋 胡龙兴 胡中立 黄春辉 黄文俊 黄文敏 江明喜 江红生 姜炎彬 焦中高 金效华 金永焕 旷远文 李建强 李 峰 李 恒 李吉涛 李 佳 李 波 李 杰 李 晶 李景文 李 静 李 明 李 珊 李文均 李晓东 李新伟 李以康 李志国 练琚愉 廖 燎 廖文波 刘贵华 刘德江 刘 峰 刘 华 刘家熙 刘青林 刘文献 刘文治 刘 星 刘 妍 刘艳杰 刘艳丽 龙超安 罗丽萍 吕艳伟 马百全 倪士峰 邱保胜 乔秀娟 秦新生 森 林 沙爱华 施海涛 石 磊 宋 杰 宋经元 苏培玺 孙 伟 谭 香 汤 俊 田宝良 田代科 王青锋 王德智 王发明 王 坤 王 鲁 王 强 王秋林 王仁才 王曙光 王文卿 王 欣 王彦昌 王永健 王中杰 王子成 汪小凡 汪秀芳 汪志伟 汪祖鹏 魏新增 谢 燕 辛海平 邢 伟 胥 晓 徐 波 徐小彪 徐耀粘 严守雷 杨春锋 杨 帆 杨明挚 杨予静 姚 军 姚小洪 姚小洪 尹黎燕 于宁宁 袁 方 袁桂香 张余洋 张 力 张石宝 张克荣 张玲玲 张培育 张考萍 张燕君 赵凯歌 赵丽娅 郑 勇 周 明 周 雯 周亚东 朱师丹 左 娟 《植物科学学报》编辑部2023 年 2 月
-
图 1 不同潮位生境海莲群落的特征及林分密度
不同小写字母表示差异显著(P<0.05)。LT:低潮位;MT:中潮位;HT:高潮位。下同。
Figure 1. Community characteristics and stand density of Bruguiera sexangula at different intertidal elevations
Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (P<0.05). LT: Low intertidal elevation; MT: Middle intertidal elevation; HT: High intertidal elevation. Same below.
图 4 不同潮位生境海莲种群的生存分析
A:低潮位;B:中潮位;C:高潮位;D:不同潮位生境下海莲种群的存活曲线。
Figure 4. Population dynamics of Bruguiera sexangula at different intertidal elevations
A: Low intertidal elevation; B: Middle intertidal elevation; C: High intertidal elevation; D: Survival curve for Bruguiera sexangula population at different intertidal elevations.
表 1 不同潮位下海莲群落内的植物种类和植株数量
Table 1 Plant species and numbers in Bruguiera sexangula communities at different intertidal levels
物种Species 株数Number 低潮位
Low intertidal
elevation中潮位
Middle intertidal
elevation高潮位
High intertidal
elevation海莲Bruguiera sexangula (Lour.) Poiret 280 469 371 无瓣海桑Sonneratia apetala Buchanan-Hamilton 17 34 28 桐花树Aegiceras corniculatum (L.) Blanco 10 45 149 榄李Lumnitzera racemosa Willdenow 0 0 13 角果木Ceriops tagal (Perr.) CB Robinson 0 0 15 黄槿Talipariti tiliaceum (L.) Fryxell 0 0 1 表 2 不同潮位生境海莲种群的分布格局
Table 2 Distribution pattern of Bruguiera sexangula populations at different intertidal elevations
潮位
Intertidal zonem* P K C I Ca 分布格局
Distribution patternLT 59.72 1.07 15.05 4.72 3.72 0.07 C MT 96.90 1.03 32.46 3.90 2.90 0.03 C HT 76.15 1.03 34.35 3.15 2.15 0.03 C 注:C,聚集分布;m*,平均拥挤度;P,聚块性指数;K,负二项式指数;C,扩散系数;I,丛生指数;Ca,Cassie指标;LT,低潮位;MT,中潮位;HT,高潮位。 Notes: C, Clumped distribution; m*, Average congestion; P, Agglomerative index; K, Negative binomial index; C, Diffusion coefficient; I, Overgrowth index; Ca, Cassie’s Indicator; LT, Low intertidal elevation; MT, Middle intertidal elevation; HT, High intertidal elevation. 表 3 不同潮位生境海莲种群的静态生命表
Table 3 Static life table parameters of Bruguiera sexangula at different intertidal elevations
潮位
Intertidal zone龄级
Age classAx ax lx lnlx dx qx Lx Tx ex Kx Sx LT Ⅰ 1 77 1 000.00 6.91 181.82 0.18 909.09 3136.36 3.45 0.20 0.82 Ⅱ 47 63 818.18 6.71 155.84 0.19 740.26 2227.27 3.01 0.21 0.81 Ⅲ 73 51 662.34 6.50 181.82 0.27 571.43 1487.01 2.60 0.32 0.73 Ⅳ 78 37 480.52 6.17 168.83 0.35 396.10 915.58 2.31 0.43 0.65 Ⅴ 33 24 311.69 5.74 168.83 0.54 227.27 519.48 2.29 0.78 0.46 Ⅵ 31 11 142.86 4.96 38.96 0.27 123.38 292.21 2.37 0.32 0.73 Ⅶ 9 8 103.90 4.64 38.96 0.38 84.42 168.83 2.00 0.47 0.63 Ⅷ 6 5 64.94 4.17 25.97 0.40 51.95 84.42 1.63 0.51 0.60 Ⅸ 2 3 38.96 3.66 25.97 0.67 25.97 32.47 1.25 1.10 0.33 Ⅹ 0 1 12.99 2.56 12.99 1.00 6.49 6.49 1.00 2.56 0.00 MT Ⅰ 49 168 1 000.00 6.91 226.19 0.23 886.90 2 291.67 2.58 0.26 0.77 Ⅱ 198 130 773.81 6.65 208.33 0.27 669.64 1 404.76 2.10 0.31 0.73 Ⅲ 134 95 565.48 6.34 220.24 0.39 455.36 735.12 1.61 0.49 0.61 Ⅳ 70 58 345.24 5.84 309.52 0.90 190.48 279.76 1.47 2.27 0.10 Ⅴ 15 6 35.71 3.58 5.95 0.17 32.74 89.29 2.73 0.18 0.83 Ⅵ 2 5 29.76 3.39 11.90 0.40 23.81 56.55 2.38 0.51 0.60 Ⅶ 1 3 17.86 2.88 5.95 0.33 14.88 32.74 2.20 0.41 0.67 Ⅷ 0 2 11.90 2.48 5.95 0.50 8.93 17.86 2.00 0.69 0.50 Ⅸ 0 1 5.95 1.78 0.00 0.00 5.95 8.93 1.50 0.00 1.00 Ⅹ 0 1 5.95 1.78 5.95 1.00 2.98 2.98 1.00 1.78 0.00 HT Ⅰ 41 154 1 000.00 6.91 285.71 0.29 857.14 1 909.09 2.23 0.34 0.71 Ⅱ 174 110 714.29 6.57 285.71 0.40 571.43 1051.95 1.84 0.51 0.60 Ⅲ 115 66 428.57 6.06 318.18 0.74 269.48 480.52 1.78 1.36 0.26 Ⅳ 35 17 110.39 4.70 32.47 0.29 94.16 211.04 2.24 0.35 0.71 Ⅴ 5 12 77.92 4.36 32.47 0.42 61.69 116.88 1.89 0.54 0.58 Ⅵ 1 7 45.45 3.82 32.47 0.71 29.22 55.19 1.89 1.25 0.29 Ⅶ 0 2 12.99 2.56 6.49 0.50 9.74 25.97 2.67 0.69 0.50 Ⅷ 0 1 6.49 1.87 0.00 0.00 6.49 16.23 2.50 0.00 1.00 Ⅸ 0 1 6.49 1.87 0.00 0.00 6.49 6.49 1.00 0.00 1.00 Ⅹ 0 1 6.49 1.87 6.49 1.00 3.25 3.25 1.00 1.87 0.00 注:Ax,x龄级内存活的个体数;ax,匀滑修正后x龄级内存活的个体数;lx,x龄级的标准化存活个体数;lnlx,lx的自然对数;dx,x龄级到x+1龄级间的标准化死亡数;qx,x龄级到x+1龄级间的死亡率;Lx,x龄级到x+1龄级间平均存活个体数;Tx,x龄级到超过x龄级的个体总数;ex,进入x龄级个体的期望寿命;Kx,消失率;Sx,存活率。 Notes: Ax, Individual number of age class x; ax, Revised data of Ax,; lx, Standardized number of surviving individuals of age class x; lnlx, Natural logarithm of lx; dx, Standardized number of mortality from age class x to age class x+1; qx, Mortality rate from age class x to age class x+1; Lx, Number of surviving individuals from age class x to age class x+1; Tx, Total individuals of age class x and age class older than x; ex, Life expectancy of individuals entering age class x; Kx, Vanish rate; Sx, Survival rate. -
[1] De Deyn GB,Raaijmakers CE,van der Putten WH. Plant community development is affected by nutrients and soil biota[J]. J Ecol,2004,92(5):824−834. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00924.x
[2] 方精云,王襄平,沈泽昊,唐志尧,贺金生,等. 植物群落清查的主要内容、方法和技术规范[J]. 生物多样性,2009,17(6):533−548. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2009.09253 Fang JY,Wang XP,Shen ZH,Tang ZY,He JS,et al. Methods and protocols for plant community inventory[J]. Biodiversity Science,2009,17(6):533−548. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2009.09253
[3] Simard M,Fatoyinbo L,Smetanka C,Rivera-Monroy VH,Castañeda-Moya E,et al. Mangrove canopy height globally related to precipitation,temperature and cyclone frequency[J]. Nat Geosci,2019,12(1):40−45. doi: 10.1038/s41561-018-0279-1
[4] He BY,Lai TH,Fan HQ,Wang WQ,Zheng HL. Comparison of flooding-tolerance in four mangrove species in a diurnal tidal zone in the Beibu Gulf[J]. Estuar Coast Shelf S,2007,74(1-2):254−262. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2007.04.018
[5] Suyadi N,Gao J,Lundquist CJ,Schwendenmann L. Land-based and climatic stressors of mangrove cover change in the Auckland Region,New Zealand[J]. Aquat Conserv,2019,29(9):1466−1483. doi: 10.1002/aqc.3146
[6] Li LF,Liu W,Ai JW,Cai SJ,Dong JW. Predicting mangrove distributions in the Beibu Gulf,Guangxi,China,using the MaxEnt model:determining tree species selection[J]. Forests,2023,14(1):149. doi: 10.3390/f14010149
[7] Chen YP,Ye Y. Growth and physiological responses of saplings of two mangrove species to intertidal elevation[J]. Mar Ecol Prog Ser,2013,482:107−118. doi: 10.3354/meps10274
[8] Zhu P,Wang YP,Shi TT,Zhang XL,Huang GQ,Gong J. Intertidal zonation affects diversity and functional potentials of bacteria in surface sediments:a case study of the Golden Bay mangrove,China[J]. Appl Soil Ecol,2018,130:159−168. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.06.003
[9] Komiyama A,Santiean T,Higo M,Patanaponpaiboon P,Kongsangchai J,Ogino K. Microtopography,soil hardness and survival of mangrove (Rhizophora apiculata BL.) seedlings planted in an abandoned tin-mining area[J]. Forest Ecol Manag,1996,81(1-3):243−248. doi: 10.1016/0378-1127(95)03591-5
[10] 李巧姿. 沿海滩涂生态因子对秋茄生长的影响分析[J]. 福建林业科技,2000,27(4):31−34. Li QZ. Analyzing influences of the ecological factor on the growth of Kandelia on a coastal shoal[J]. Journal of Fujian Forestry Science and Technology,2000,27(4):31−34.
[11] 郑文炳,吴蓓莉. 海滨木槿的滩涂生态适应性研究[J]. 农业开发与装备,2012(6):83−84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9205.2012.06.058 [12] Cheng MCF,Ho KKY,Astudillo JC,Cannicci S. An updated ecological assessment of floral and faunal communities of mangrove habitats in Tolo Harbour and Channel,Hong Kong[J]. Reg Stud Mar Sci,2023,59:102807.
[13] 金川. 浙江人工红树林对关键环境因子的生态响应研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学,2011:4−10. [14] 王佳燕,余雪标,周光益,王旭,李洪旺. 海南东寨港海莲群落林隙结构及其更新特征[J]. 热带作物学报,2008,29(1):109−113. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2008.01.023 Wang JY,Yu XB,Zhou GY,Wang X,Li HW. Canopy gap structure and regeneration character of Bruguiera sexangula in Dongzhai Harbour,Hainan Island[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops,2008,29(1):109−113. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2008.01.023
[15] 李茂金,叶储民,陈玉凯. 海南清澜港红树植物海莲种群结构与分布格局研究[J]. 热带林业,2022,50(2):8−14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0938.2022.02.002 Li MJ,Ye CM,Chen YK. Study on population structure and distribution pattern of mangrove species Bruguiera sexangula in Qinglan Port of Hainan[J]. Tropical Forestry,2022,50(2):8−14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0938.2022.02.002
[16] 郑文教,林鹏. 盐度对红树植物海莲幼苗的生长和某些生理生态特性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,1992,3(1):9−14. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.1992.01.014 Zheng WJ,Lin P. Effect of salinity on the growth and some eco-physiological characteristics of mangrove Bruguiera sexangula seedlings[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,1992,3(1):9−14. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.1992.01.014
[17] 王豪,杨小波,吕晓波,李东海,王重阳,戚春林. 海南岛东北和西北部自然红树林群落特征比较[J]. 海南大学学报(自然科学版),2024,42(2):146−154. Wang H,Yang XB,Lü XB,Li DH,Wang CY,Qi CL. Characteristics comparison of the natural mangrove communities in northeast and northwest Hainan[J]. Natural Science Journal of Hainan University (Natural Science),2024,42(2):146−154.
[18] Zaman MR,Rahman MS,Ahmed S,Zuidema PA. What drives carbon stocks in a mangrove forest? The role of stand structure,species diversity and functional traits[J]. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci,2023,295:108556. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2023.108556
[19] Ma L,Yang SC. Growth and physiological response of Kandelia obovata and Bruguiera sexangula seedlings to aluminum stress[J]. Environ Sci Pollut Res,2022,29(28):43251−43266. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17926-0
[20] Azad MS,Mollick AS,Ranon RJK,Khan MNI,Kamruzzaman M. Plasticity of leaf morphology of Bruguiera sexangula to salinity zones in Bangladesh’s Sundarbans[J]. J For Res,2022,33(6):1857−1866. doi: 10.1007/s11676-022-01470-9
[21] Khanbo S,U-Thoomporn S,Kongkachana W,Charoensri S,Narong N,et al. Genetic diversity and population structure of the upriver orange mangrove Bruguiera sexangula along the coastlines of Thailand[J]. Aquat Biol,2023,32:31−41. doi: 10.3354/ab00761
[22] Zhang Y,Xin K,Sheng N,Xie ZL,Liao BW. The regenerative capacity of eight mangrove species based on propagule traits in Dongzhai Harbor,Hainan Province,China[J]. Glob Ecol Conserv,2021,30:e01788.
[23] Xin K,Xie ZL,Zhong CR,Sheng N,Gao C,et al. Damage caused by Sphaeroma to Mangrove Forests in Hainan,Dongzhaigang,China[J]. J Coastal Res,2020,36(6):1197−1203.
[24] Qayoom H,Alkhanani M,Almilaibary A,Alsagaby SA,Mir MA. A network pharmacology-based investigation of Brugine reveals its multi-target molecular mechanism against breast cancer[J]. Med Oncol,2023,40(7):202. doi: 10.1007/s12032-023-02067-w
[25] 林鹏,卢昌义,王恭礼,陈焕雄. 海南岛河港海莲红树林凋落物动态的研究[J]. 植物生态学与地植物学学报,1990,14(1):69−74. Lin P,Lu CY,Wang GL,Chen HX. Study on dynamics of litter fall of Bruguiera sexangula mangrove in Hainan Island,China[J]. Acta Phytoecologyet Geobotanica Sinica,1990,14(1):69−74.
[26] Li CM,Wang HC,Liao XL,Xiao R,Liu KH,et al. Heavy metal pollution in coastal wetlands:a systematic review of studies globally over the past three decades[J]. J Hazard Mater,2022,424:127312. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127312
[27] Niu YH,An ZR,Gao DZ,Chen FY,Zhou J,et al. Tidal dynamics regulates potential coupling of carbon-nitrogen-sulfur cycling microbes in intertidal flats[J]. Sci Total Environ,2023,899:165663. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165663
[28] Yu ZW,Wang ML,Sun ZY,Wang WJ,Chen Q. Changes in the leaf functional traits of mangrove plant assemblages along an intertidal gradient in typical mangrove wetlands in Hainan,China[J]. Glob Ecol Conserv,2023,48:e02749.
[29] 吕晓波,钟才荣,张孟文,方赞山,程成,等. 海南东寨港红海榄种群结构与数量动态变化特征[J]. 热带生物学报,2023,14(5):490−498. Lü XB,Zhong CR,Zhang MW,Fang ZS,Cheng C,et al. Population structure and dynamics of Rhizophora stylosa in Dongzhaigang National Mangrove Reserve,Hainan[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology,2023,14(5):490−498.
[30] 辜晓虹,邱彭华,陈卫,周文芊,陈晓娟,杨仕莉. 海口东寨港自然保护区红树林变化及其与周边社区关联分析[J]. 热带地理,2023,43(1):43−58. Gu XH,Qiu PH,Chen W,Zhou WQ,Chen XJ,Yang SL. Mangrove forest change in Haikou Dongzhaigang Nature Reserve and its association with surrounding communities[J]. Tropical Geography,2023,43(1):43−58.
[31] 张育霞. 不同潮间带角果木种群特征及其繁殖特性研究[D]. 海口:海南大学,2015:11−14. [32] 何东进,肖石红,李晓景,王韧,蔡金标,游巍斌. 中国红树林北缘区秋茄树种群空间分布格局和结构特征分析[J]. 植物资源与环境学报,2014,23(2):41−47. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2014.02.06 He DJ,Xiao SH,Li XJ,Wang R,Cai JB,You WB. Analyses on spatial distribution pattern and structure characteristics of Kandelia candel population in north marginal region of mangrove,China[J]. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment,2014,23(2):41−47. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2014.02.06
[33] 江洪. 云杉种群生态学[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社,1992:7−13. [34] 王进,姚兰,艾训儒,朱江,刘松柏. 鄂西南不同区域亮叶桦种群结构与动态特征[J]. 应用生态学报,2020,31(2):357−365. Wang J,Yao L,Ai XR,Zhu J,Liu SB. Structure and dynamic characteristics of Betula luminifera populations in different regions of Southwest Hubei Province,China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2020,31(2):357−365.
[35] 牛翠娟,娄安如,孙儒泳,李庆芬. 基础生态学[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社,2015:151−152. [36] Shaltout KH,Ahmed DA,Shabana HA. Population structure and dynamics of the endemic species Phlomis aurea Decne in different habitats in southern Sinai Peninsula,Egypt[J]. Glob Ecol Conserv,2015,4:505−515.
[37] 李大东,董廷发,陈坚,史清茂,何显湘,等. 四川米仓山自然保护区台湾水青冈群落学特征及多样性研究[J]. 西北植物学报,2016,36(1):174−182. Li DD,Dong TF,Chen J,Shi QM,He XX,et al. Characteristics of Fagus hayatae community and species diversity in Micangshan Nature Reserve,Sichuan[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica,2016,36(1):174−182.
[38] Lefcheck JS,Byrnes JEK,Isbell F,Gamfeldt L,Griffin JN,et al. Biodiversity enhances ecosystem multifunctionality across trophic levels and habitats[J]. Nat Commun,2015,6(1):6936. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7936
[39] 廖宝文. 三种红树植物对潮水淹浸与水体盐度适应能力的研究[D]. 北京:中国林业科学研究院,2010:111−118. [40] 陈鹭真,林鹏,王文卿. 红树植物淹水胁迫响应研究进展[J]. 生态学报,2006,26(2):586−593. Chen LZ,Lin P,Wang WQ. Mechanisms of mangroves waterlogging resistance[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2006,26(2):586−593.
[41] Deborde J,Marchand C,Molnar N,Della Patrona L,Meziane T. Concentrations and fractionation of carbon,iron,sulfur,nitrogen and phosphorus in mangrove sediments along an intertidal gradient (semi-arid climate,New Caledonia)[J]. J Mar Sci Eng,2015,3(1):52−72. doi: 10.3390/jmse3010052
[42] 林鹏. 中国东南部海岸红树林的类群及其分布[J]. 生态学报,1981,1(3):283−290. Lin P. Ecological notes on mangroves in Southeast coast of China including Taiwan Province and Hainan Island[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,1981,1(3):283−290.
[43] 陈玉军,李婷,朱立安,林梓,贾桐,朱虎. 淹水梯度对红树林湿地土壤微生物生物量与酶活性的影响[J]. 水土保持通报,2022,42(6):68−75. Chen YJ,Li T,Zhu LA,Lin Z,Jia T,Zhu H. Effects of flooding gradient on soil microbial biomass and enzyme activities in a mangrove wetland[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,42(6):68−75.
[44] 詹有生. 江西部分常绿阔叶林物种多样性的研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报,1997,21(1):67−70. Zhan YS. Study on the species diversity in part of the evergreen broad leaved forest communities of Jiangxi[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University,1997,21(1):67−70.
[45] 彭宗波,蒋英. 优势种密度制约及其对森林群落物种多样性维持的影响[J]. 资源与生态学报,2016,7(4):275−280. doi: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2016.04.006 Peng ZB,Jiang Y. Density dependence of a dominant species and the effects on community diversity maintainance[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology,2016,7(4):275−280. doi: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2016.04.006
[46] Hacker SD,Bertness MD. Experimental evidence for factors maintaining plant species diversity in a New England salt marsh[J]. Ecology,1999,80(6):2064−2073. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[2064:EEFFMP]2.0.CO;2
[47] 李大东,胥晓,史清茂,陈坚,昝玺,等. 四川米仓山自然保护区台湾水青冈群落学特征沿海拔梯度的变化[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报,2016,24(6):626−634. Li DD,Xu X,Shi QM,Chen J,Zan X,et al. Characteristics of Fagus hayatae community along altitudinal gradient in Micangshan Nature Reserve,Sichuan[J]. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany,2016,24(6):626−634.
[48] McKee KL. Seedling recruitment patterns in a Belizean mangrove forest:effects of establishment ability and physico-chemical factors[J]. Oecologia,1995,101(4):448−460. doi: 10.1007/BF00329423
[49] 吕晓波. 海南岛六种红树植物幼苗对光照、盐度和淹水时间的生理适应性研究[D]. 海口:海南大学,2019:218−227. [50] 王立龙,王亮,张丽芳,刘玉洋,徐世健. 不同生境下濒危植物裸果木种群结构及动态特征[J]. 植物生态学报,2015,39(10):980−989. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0095 Wang LL,Wang L,Zhang LF,Liu YY,Xu SJ. Structure and dynamic characteristics of Gymnocarpos przewalskii in different habitats[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology,2015,39(10):980−989. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0095
[51] 李敏敏,刘鹏程,孔维民,马方莲,李帅锋,王萌. 濒危植物澜沧黄杉种群结构及动态特征[J]. 生态学报,2022,42(13):5504−5515. Li MM,Liu PC,Kong WM,Ma FL,Li SF,Wang M. Population structure and dynamic characteristics of the endangered Pseudotsuga forrestii Craib[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2022,42(13):5504−5515.
[52] 刘震,闫淑君,田高飞,吴艳芳,段嵩岚,潘刚. 小果紫薇林近自然种群结构及动态特征[J]. 森林与环境学报,2017,37(3):342−347. Liu Z,Yan SJ,Tian GF,Wu YF,Duan SL,Pan G. Structure and dynamic characteristics of Lagerstroemia minuticarpa near-natural population[J]. Journal of Forest and Environment,2017,37(3):342−347.