我国喀斯特植被根系生态学研究进展

吴静; 盛茂银

doi:10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2020.40565

我国喀斯特植被根系生态学研究进展

吴静^1,3,
盛茂银^1,2, ,

1. 贵州师范大学喀斯特研究院, 贵阳 550001;
2. 国家喀斯特石漠化治理工程技术研究中心, 贵阳 550001;
3. 贵州省喀斯特石漠化防治与衍生产业工程实验室, 贵阳 550001

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目（31660136）；贵州省科学技术基金（黔科合基础[2019]1224号）；贵州省优秀青年科技人才支持计划项目（黔科合平台人才[2017]5638）；贵州省普通高等学校科技拔尖人才支持计划（黔教合KY字[2016]064）。

详细信息

作者简介:
吴静(1994-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事岩溶生态建设与区域经济研究(E-mail:wujing914@163.com)。

通讯作者:
盛茂银,E-mail:shmoy@163.com

中图分类号: Q948
计量
- 文章访问数: 699
- HTML全文浏览量: 21
- PDF下载量: 632
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-11-13
- 修回日期: 2020-01-11
- 网络出版日期: 2022-10-31
- 发布日期: 2020-08-27

Research progress in root ecology of karst vegetation in China

Wu Jing^1,3,
Sheng Mao-Yin^1,2, ,

1. Institute of Karst Research, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China;
2. National Engineering Research Center for Karst Rocky Desertification Control, Guiyang 550001, China;
3. Guizhou Engineering Laboratory for Karst Rocky Desertification Control and Derivative Industry, Guiyang 550001, China

Funds:

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31660136), Project of Guizhou Science and Technology Fund (Qiankehe Jichu[2019]1224), Support Plan for Excellent Young Science and Technology Talents of Guizhou Province (Qiankehe Pingtai Rencai[2017]5638), and Support Plan for Science and Technology Top-notch Talents of Guizhou Higher Education Institutions (Qianjiaohe KY zi[2016]064).

摘要

摘要: 我国传统的植被根系生态学研究主要针对热带、亚热带、温带以及西部干旱半干旱的非喀斯特地区，而对喀斯特地区植被根系生态学的研究甚少，对其认识相对零散和片段化。该文对我国喀斯特地区植被生境特点、根系特征（根系生物量、根系构型、根系化学养分）、自然因子和人为因子对根系生态学特征的影响，以及植被根系与植被演替、碳循环、全球变化的关系等进行综述，并对今后喀斯特地区植被根系的研究方向及发展趋势进行展望，旨在为我国喀斯特植被根系生态学的深入研究提供参考。
- 喀斯特 /
- 根系 /
- 生境 /
- 生态学特征 /
- 影响因子
Abstract: Traditional research on root ecology of vegetation in China has mainly focused on tropical, subtropical, temperate, arid, and semi-arid non-karst areas in the west of China. To date, little research has been conducted on the root ecology of vegetation in karst areas, and current understanding is relatively fragmented. In this paper, the vegetation habitat characteristics, root system characteristics (root biomass, architecture, chemical nutrients), effects of natural and human factors on root ecological characteristics, and relationship between vegetation root and vegetation succession, carbon cycle, and global change are reviewed. We also discuss future research directions and development trends of vegetation root systems in karst areas. This study aims to provide a reference for further research on karst vegetation root ecology in China.
- Karst /
- Root /
- Habitat /
- Ecological characteristics /
- Influencing factors

HTML全文

参考文献(49)

[1]	盛茂银, 熊康宁, 崔高仰, 刘洋. 贵州喀斯特石漠化地区植物多样性与土壤理化性质[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(2):434-448. Sheng MY, Xiong KN, Cui GY, Liu Y. Plant diversity and soil physical-chemical properties in karst rocky desertification ecosystem of Guizhou, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(2):434-448.
[2]	Wang LJ, Wang P, Sheng MY, Tian J. Ecological stoichiometry and environmental influencing factors of soil nutrients in the karst rocky desertification ecosystem, southwest China[J]. Glob Ecol Conserv, 2018, 30(2):400-408.
[3]	罗光杰, 李阳兵, 王世杰, 程安云, 丹文丽. 岩溶山区景观多样性变化的生态学意义对比:以贵州四个典型地区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(14):3882-3889. Luo GJ, Li YB, Wang SJ, Cheng AY, Dan WL. Comparison of ecological significance of landscape diversity changes in karst mountains:a case study of 4 typical karst area in Guizhou province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(14):3882-3889.
[4]	张军以, 戴明宏, 王腊春, 苏维词, 曹立国. 西南喀斯特石漠化治理植物选择与生态适应性[J]. 地球与环境, 2015, 43(3):269-278. Zhang JY, Dai MH, Wang LC, Sui WC, Cao LG. Plant selection and their ecological adaptation for rocky desertification control in karst region in the southwest China[J]. Earth and Environment, 2015, 43(3):269-278.
[5]	刘立斌, 钟巧连, 倪健. 基于生物量回归方程估算黔中喀斯特常绿落叶阔叶混交林木本植物的根系生物量[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(24):8726-8732. Liu LB, Zhong QL, Ni J. Allometric function-based root biomass estimate of woody plants in a karst evergreen and deciduous broadleaf and mixed forest incentral Guizhou province, southwestern China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(24):8726-8732.
[6]	潘晓迪, 张颖, 邵萌, 马黎明, 郭新宇. 作物根系结构对干旱胁迫的适应性研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2017, 19(2):51-58. Pan XD, Zhang Y, Shao M, Ma NM, Guo XY. Research progress on adaptive responses of crop root structure to drought stress[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technoligy, 2017, 19(2):51-58.
[7]	苏樑, 宋同清, 杜虎, 曾馥平, 王华, 等. 喀斯特峰丛洼地不同植被恢复阶段优势种根系构型特征[J]. 西北植物学报, 2018, 38(1):150-157. Su L, Song TQ, Du H, Zeng FP, Wang H, et al. Root architecture of the dominant species in various vegetation restoration processes in karst peak-cluster dapression[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2018, 38(1):150-157.
[8]	Jackson RB, Mooney HA, Schulze ED. A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents[J]. P Natl Acad Sci USA, 1997, 94(14):7362-7366.
[9]	Vogt KA, Grier CC, Vogt DJ. Production, turnover, and nutrient dynamics of above and belowground detritus of world forests[J]. Adv Ecol Res, 1986, 15(15):303-377.
[10]	Wang WJ, Mo QF, Han XG, Hui DF, Shen WJ. Fine root dynamics responses to nitrogen addition depend on root order, soil layer, and experimental duration in a subtropical forest[J]. Biol Fert Soils, 2019, 55(7):723-736.
[11]	Parts K, Tedersoo L, Schindlbacher A. Acclimation of fine root systems to soil warming:comparison of an experimental setup and a natural soil temperature gradient[J]. Acta Physiol, 2019, 22(3):457-472.
[12]	单立山. 西北典型荒漠植物根系形态结构和功能及抗旱生理研究[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学, 2013.
[13]	Trumbore SE, Gaudinski JB. The secret lives of roots[J]. Science, 2003, 302(5649):1344-1345.
[14]	王浩, 黄晨璐, 杨方社, 李怀恩. 砒砂岩区沙棘根系的生境适应性[J].应用生态学报, 2019, 30(1):157-164. Wang H, Huang CL, Yang FS, Li HE. Root habitat flexibi-lity of seabuckthorn in the pisha sandstone area[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(1):157-164.
[15]	刘雯雯. 喀斯特植被恢复不同阶段土壤微生物组成及氮磷土壤酶对生境响应[D]. 贵阳:贵州大学, 2019.
[16]	Nie YP, Chen HS, Wang KL, Ding YL, Ding YL. Rooting characteristics of two widely distributed woody plant species growing in different karst habitats of southwest China[J]. Plant Ecol, 2014, 215(10):1099-1109.
[17]	盛茂银, 刘洋, 熊康宁. 中国南方喀斯特石漠化演替过程中土壤理化性质的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(19):6303-6313. Sheng MY, Liu Y, Xiong KN. Response of soil physical-chemical properties to rocky desertification succession in south China karst[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(19):6303-6313.
[18]	李阳兵, 王世杰, 王济. 岩溶生态系统的土壤特性及其今后研究方向[J]. 中国岩溶, 2006(4):285-289. Li YB, Wang SJ, Wang J. Soil properties in karst ecosystem and further study[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2006(4):285-289.
[19]	Pernot C, Thiffault N, Desrochers A. Contribution of adventitious vs initial roots to growth and physiology of black spruce seedlings[J]. Physiol Plantarum, 2019, 165(1):29-38.
[20]	罗东辉, 夏婧, 袁婧薇, 张忠华, 祝介东, 等. 我国西南山地喀斯特植被的根系生物量初探[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(5):611-618. Luo DH, Xia J, Yuan JW, Zhang ZH, Zhu JD, et al. Root biomass of karst vegetation in a mountainous area of southwestern China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(5):611-618.
[21]	Liu LB, Wu YY, Hu G, Zhang ZH, Cheng AY, et al. Biomass of karst evergreen and deciduous broadleaved mixed forest in central Guizhou province, southwestern China:a comprehensive inventory of a 2 ha plot[J]. Silva Fenn, 2016, 50(3):1492.
[22]	Ni J, Luo DH, Xia J, Zhang ZH, Hu G. Vegetation in karst terrain of southwestern China allocates more biomass to roots[J]. Solid Earth, 2015, 6(3):799-810.
[23]	宋海燕, 张静, 李素慧, 梁千慧, 李若溪, 等. 基于容器分区处理探究黑麦草生长对喀斯特不同土壤生境和水分的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(10):3557-3565. Song HY, Zhang J, Li SH, Liang QH, Li RX, et al. Growth response of lolium perenne lunder different soil habitats and water conditions based on container partition in a karst area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(10):3557-3565.
[24]	Fitter AH, Stickland TR. Architectural analysis of plant root systems:Ⅲ. Studies on plants under field conditions[J]. New Phytol, 1992, 121(2):243-248.
[25]	Oppelt AL, Kurth W, Jentschke G, Godbold DL. Contrasting rooting patterns of some arid-zone fruit tree species from BotswanaⅠ. Fine root distribution[J]. Agroforest Syst, 2005, 64:1-11.
[26]	黄同丽, 唐丽霞, 陈龙, 张乔艳. 喀斯特区3种灌木根系构型及其生态适应策略[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2019, 17(1):89-94. Huang TL, Tang LX, Cheng L, Zhang QY. Root architecture and ecological adaptation strategy of three shrubs in karst area[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 17(1):89-94.
[27]	Ge YC, Fang X, Liu W, Sheng LH, Xu L. Adventitious lateral rooting:the plasticity of root system architecture[J]. Physiol Plantarum, 2018, 165(1):434-448.
[28]	王浩. 砒砂岩区不同生境条件下沙棘根系构型特征研究[D]. 西安:西北大学, 2018.
[29]	何广志, 陈亚宁, 陈亚鹏, 王日照. 柽柳根系构型对干旱的适应策略[J]. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 52(3):277-282. He GZ, Chen YN, Chen YP, Wang RZ. Adaptive strategy of Tamarix spp. root architecture in arid environment[J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural Science), 2016, 52(3):277-282.
[30]	杜有新, 李恋卿, 潘根兴, 胡忠良, 王新洲. 贵州中部喀斯特山地三种优势灌木养分分布[J]. 生态环境学报, 2010, 19(3):626-630. Du YX, Li LQ, Pan GX, Hu ZL, Wang XZ. Distribution patterns of main nutrients in three dominant shrubs in Karst mountainous areas in central Guizhou, China[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2010, 19(3):626-630.
[31]	马玉珠, 钟全林, 靳冰洁, 卢宏典, 郭炳桥, 等. 中国植物细根碳、氮、磷化学计量学的空间变化及其影响因子[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(2):159-166. Ma YZ, Zhong QL, Jin BJ, Lu HD, Guo BJ, et al. Spatial changes and influencing factors of fine root carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry of plants in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2015, 39(2):159-166.
[32]	Wang ZQ, Yu KL, Lv SQ, Niklas KJ, Mipam TD, et al. The scaling of fine root nitrogen versus phosphorus in terrestrial plants:a global synthesis[J]. Funct Ecol, 2019, 33(11):159-166.
[33]	徐立清, 崔东海, 王庆成, 张勇,马双娇, 等. 张广才岭西坡次生林不同生境胡桃楸幼树根系构型及细根特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(2):373-380. Xu LQ, Cui DH, Wang QC, Zhang Y, Ma SJ, et al. Root architecture and fine root characteristics of Juglans mandshurica in different habitats in the secondary forest on the west slope of Zhangguangcailing, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(2):373-380.
[34]	李金波, 李诗刚, 宋桂龙, 濮阳雪华, 薛博晗, 等. 砷胁迫对黑麦草根系形态及养分吸收的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2018, 35(6):1385-1392. Li JB, Li SG, Song GL, Pu YXH, Xue BH, et al. Effect of arsenic stress on root morphological paramenters and absorption anutrient elements in ryegrass[J]. Pratacutural Science, 2018, 35(6):1385-1392.
[35]	方瑛, 安韶山, 马任甜. 云雾山不同恢复方式下草地植物与土壤的化学计量学特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(1):80-88. Fang Y, An SS, Ma RT. Ecological stoichiometric characteristics of plants and soil in grassland under different restoration types in Yunwu Mountain, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(1):80-88.
[36]	张海东, 汝海丽, 焦峰, 薛超玉, 郭美丽. 黄土丘陵区退耕时间序列梯度上草本植被群落与土壤C、N、P、K化学计量学特征[J]. 环境科学, 2016, 37(3):1128-1138. Zhang HD, Ru HL, Jiao F, Xue CY, Guo ML. C,N,P,K stoichiometric characteristic of leaves, root and soil in differentabandoned years in loess plateau[J]. Environmental Science, 2016, 37(3):1128-1138.
[37]	胥晏. 贵州喀斯特生态脆弱区圆果化香种群更新特性研究[D]. 贵阳:贵州师范大学, 2019.
[38]	王元素, 洪绂曾, 蒋文兰, 王堃. 喀斯特地区红三叶混播草地群落对长期适度放牧的响应[J]. 生态环境, 2007(1):117-124. Wang YS, Hong FZ, Jiang WL, Wang K. Responses of trifolium pratense mixed communities to long-term moderate grazing in karst region[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2007(1):117-124.
[39]	丁磊. 基于喀斯特地区水资源高效利用的节水灌溉技术初探[D]. 贵阳:贵州师范大学, 2018.
[40]	苏樑, 宋同清, 杜虎, 曾馥平, 王华, 等. 喀斯特峰丛洼地不同植被恢复阶段细根生物量、形态特征及其影响因素[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(3):783-789. Su L, Song TQ, Du H, Zeng FP, Wang H, et al. Biomass and morphological characteristics of fine roots and their affecting factors in different vegetation restoration stages in depressions between karst hills[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(3):783-789.
[41]	Yu YF, He TG, Song TQ, Du H, Wei CY, et al. Stoichiometric characteristics of vegetation successional stages in karst area of northwest Guangxi[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2018, 49(3):440-447.
[42]	Crookshanks M, Broadmeadow M, Taylor G. Elevated CO₂ and root growth:contrasting responses in Fraxinus excelsior, Quercus petraea and Pinus sylvestris[J]. New Phytol, 2010, 138(2):241-250.
[43]	Ellsworth PZ, Sternberg LSL. Linking soil nutrient availabi-lity, fine root production and turnover, and species composition in a seasonally dry plant community[J]. Plant Soil, 2019, 442:49-63.
[44]	Prior SA, Runion GB, Torbert HA. Sour orange fine root distribution after seventeen years of atmospheric CO₂ enrichment[J]. Agr Forest Meteorol, 2012, 162-163:85-90.
[45]	Canadell J, Jackson RB, Ehleringer JR, Schulze SD. Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale[J]. Oecologia, 1996, 108(4):583-595.
[46]	Kou L, Jiang L, Fu X, Dai X, Wang H, et al. Nitrogen deposition increases root production and turnover but slows root decomposition in Pinus elliottii plantations[J]. New Phytol, 2018, 218(4):115-123.
[47]	Schulze ED, Mooney HA, Sala OE, Jobbagy E, Buchmann N, et al. Rooting depth, water availability, and vegetation cover along an aridity gradient in patagonia[J]. Oecologia, 1996, 108(3):503-511.
[48]	胡琪娟, 王霖娇, 盛茂银. 植物细根生产和周转研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究, 2019, 32(2):29-34. Hu QJ, Wang LJ, Sheng MY. Research progress of plant fine root production and turnover[J]. World Forestry Research, 2019, 32(2):29-34.
[49]	尹华军, 张子良, 刘庆. 森林根系分泌物生态学研究:问题与展望[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(11):1055-1070. Yi HJ, Zhang ZL, Liu Q. Root exudates and their ecological consequences in forest ecosystems:problems and perspective[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2018, 42(11):1055-1070.

施引文献(17)

期刊类型引用(8)

1.	师雪淇，程金花，管凝，侯芳，沈子雅. 喀斯特地区典型植被根系对优先流的影响. 水土保持研究. 2024(05): 73-83 . 百度学术
2.	庞榆，贺同鑫，孙建飞，宁文彩，裴广廷，胡宝清，王斌. 北热带喀斯特森林优势树种细根生物量估算模型构建. 植物生态学报. 2024(10): 1312-1325 . 百度学术
3.	覃桂丽，玉舒中. 降香黄檀根系性状对石灰岩石砾的适应响应. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学). 2023(03): 24-32 . 百度学术
4.	吴静，盛茂银，肖海龙，郭超，王霖娇. 西南喀斯特石漠化环境适生植物细根构型及其与细根和根际土壤养分计量特征的相关性. 生态学报. 2022(02): 677-687 . 百度学术
5.	林伟山，德科加，向雪梅，钱诗祎，魏希杰，冯廷旭. 天然草地植被-土壤系统碳、氮、磷(钾)库的时空分布格局研究进展. 青海畜牧兽医杂志. 2022(02): 45-51+68 . 百度学术
6.	杨慧，宁静，马洋，周孟霞，曹建华. 西南岩溶区植被碳循环研究进展. 广西植物. 2022(06): 903-913 . 百度学术
7.	薛建辉，周之栋，吴永波. 喀斯特石漠化山地退化土壤生态修复研究进展. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(06): 135-145 . 百度学术
8.	张新生，卢杰. 根系生物量及其对根际生态系统响应的研究进展. 江苏农业科学. 2021(17): 39-45 . 百度学术