Relationship between stigma sensitivity and floral traits in three Mazus (Mazaceae) species with bilobed stigma
-
摘要: 选取3种具有不同传粉环境及花部结构差异明显的通泉草属（Mazus）植物，即毛果通泉草（M.spicatus Vaniot）、长蔓通泉草（M.longipes Bonati）和弹刀子菜（M.stachydifolius（Turcz.）Maxim.），观测其柱头触敏性行为，测量有关花部性状，对它们之间的相关性进行比较分析。结果显示，在相同强度的刺激下，毛果通泉草的柱头最为迟钝（闭合时间最长），弹刀子菜最为敏感，而长蔓通泉草介于两者之间。此外，柱头触敏性最强的弹刀子菜比柱头触敏性相对较弱的长蔓通泉草和毛果通泉草具有更深的花色、更大的单花展示、更长的药柱距以及更大的花粉胚珠比。研究结果表明通泉草属植物柱头触敏性的进化与花部特征密切相关，它们共同影响传粉过程中对传粉者的吸引、花粉落置、传递效率以及植物交配系统的构成式样。Abstract: Three Mazus species, that is M. spicatus Vaniot, M. longipes Bonati, and M. stachydifolius (Turcz.) Maxim., in different pollination environments and with significantly different floral structures were selected in our study. By observing stigma behaviors and measuring floral traits, the relationships among them were analyzed and compared. Results indicated that under the same stimulation, M. spicatus was the least sensitive (Longest stigma closing time), followed by M. longipes, with M. stachydifolius being the most sensitive. Furthermore, the three Mazus species showed significant differences in floral traits, such as flower color, floral display, anther stigma separation, and pollen-ovule ratio. Compared to M. spicatus and M. longipes with weaker stigma sensitivity, M. stachydifolius with stronger stigma sensitivity had purple flowers, larger single flower display area, longer anther-stigma separation, and larger pollen-ovule ratio. Our study indicates that the evolution of stigma sensitivity in Mazus may be closely linked with floral traits that influence pollinator attraction, pollen loads, pollen deliver efficiency, and composition pattern of the plant mating system.
-
Keywords:
- Stigma sensitivity /
- Floral traits /
- Mazus /
- Flower color /
- Single flower display /
- Anther-stigma separation /
- Pollen-ovule ratio /
- Pollination
-
-
[1] 白伟宁, 张大勇. 雌雄同体植物的性别干扰及其进化意义[J]. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(4):672-679. Bai WN, Zhang DY. Sexual interference in cosexual plants and its evolutionary implications[J]. Acta Phytoecological Sinica, 2005, 29(4):672-679.
[2] Angiosperm phylogeny group. An update of the angiosperm phylogeny group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants:APGⅣ[J]. Bot J Linn Soc, 2016, 181(1):1-20.
[3] 金晓芳. 开花植物触敏柱头的行为多样性与适应意义[D]. 北京:中国科学院研究生院, 2015. [4] Newcombe FC. Significance of the behavior of sensitive stigmas[J]. Am J Bot, 1922, 9:99-120.
[5] Webb CJ, Lloyd DG. The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiospermsⅡ. Herkogamy[J]. New Zeal J Bot, 1986, 24(1):163-178.
[6] Fetscher EA, Rupert SM, Kohn JR. Hummingbird foraging position is altered by the touch-sensitive stigma of bush monkeyflower[J]. Oecologia, 2002, 133(4):551-558.
[7] Linskens HF. Stigmatic responses[C]//Sheikh KH, Vardar Y, eds. Proceedings of the third MPP Meeting. Izmir Turkey:Ege University, 1976:1-12.
[8] Thieret JW. Floral biology of Proboscidea louisianica (Martyniaceae)[J]. Rhodora, 1976, 78(814):169-179.
[9] Milet-Pinheiro P, Carvalho AT, Kevan PG, Schlindwein C. Permanent stigma closure in Bignoniaceae:mechanism and implications for fruit set in self-incompatible species[J]. Flora, 2009, 204(1):82-88.
[10] Dole JA. Reproductive assurance mechanisms in three taxa of the Mimulus guttatus complex (Scrophulariaceae)[J]. Am J Bot, 1992, 79:650-659.
[11] Friedman J, Hart KS, den Bakker MC. Losing one's touch:Evolution of the touch-sensitive stigma in the Mimulus guttatus species complex[J]. Am J Bot, 2017, 104(2):335-341.
[12] Vickery RK. Speciation in Mimulus, or, can a simple flower color mutant lead to species divergence?[J]. Great Basin Nat, 1995, 55(2):177-180.
[13] Mitchell RJ, Karron JD, Holmquist KG, Bell JM. The influence of Mimulus ringens floral display size on pollinator visitation patterns[J]. Funct Ecol, 2004, 18(1):116-124.
[14] Jin XF, Ye ZM, Wang QF, Yang CF. Relationship of stigma behaviors and breeding system in three Mazus (Phrymaceae) species with bilobed stigma[J]. J Syst Evol, 2015, 53(3):259-265.
[15] Fetscher AE. Resolution of male-female conflict in an hermaphroditic flower[J]. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci, 2001, 268(1466):525-529.
[16] 谢宗万, 梁爱华. 全国中草药汇编[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 1996. [17] Beardsley PM, Olmstead RG. Redefining Phrymaceae:the placement of Mimulus, tribe Mimuleae, and Phryma[J]. Am J Bot, 2002, 89(7):1093-1102.
[18] Jin XF, Ye ZM, Amboka GM, Wang QF, Yang CF. Stigma sensitivity and the duration of temporary closure are affected by pollinator identity in Mazus miquelii (Phrymaceae), a species with bilobed stigma[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2017, 8:1-7.
[19] Hong DY, Yang HB, Jin CL, Holmgren NH. Scrophularia-ceae[M]//Wu ZY, Raven PH, eds. Flora of China. Beijing:Science Press; St. Louis:Missouri Botanical Garden Press, 1998.
[20] Waser NM, Price MV. Pollinator choice and stabilizing selection for flower color in Delphinium nelsonii[J]. Evolution, 1981, 35(2):376-390.
[21] Bodbyl-Roels SA. Mating system evolution, plant-pollinator interactions, and floral ultraviolet patterning in Mimulus guttatus[D]. Kansas:University of Kansas, 2012.
[22] Darwin C. The effects of cross and self-fertilization in the vegetable kingdom[M]. London:John Murray, 1876:1.
[23] Kevan P. The Pollination of Flowers by Insects[M]. London:Academic Press for the Linnean Society of London, 1978:51.
[24] Jones KN, Reithel JS. Pollinator-mediated selection on a flower color polymorphism in experimental populations of Antirrhinum (Scrophulariaceae)[J]. Am J Bot, 2001, 88(3):447-454.
[25] Vickery,Robert K. Pollination experiments in the Mimulus cardinalis-M. lewisii complex[J]. Great Basin Nat, 1990, 50(2):155-159.
[26] Cresswell JE, Galen C. Frequency-dependent selection and adaptive surfaces for floral character combinations:the pollination of Polemonium viscosum[J]. Am Nat, 1991, 138(6):1342-1353.
[27] Spaethe J, Tautz J, Chittka L. Visual constraints in foraging bumblebees:flower size and color affect search time and flight behavior[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2001, 98(7):3898-3903.
[28] Somanathan H, Borges RM. Nocturnal pollination by the carpenter bee Xylocopa tenuiscapa (Apidae) and the effect of floral display on fruit set of Heterophragma quadriloculare (Bignoniaceae) in India[J]. Biotropica, 2001, 33(1):78-89.
[29] Willson MF. Sexual selection in plants[J]. Am Nat, 1979, 113(6):777-790.
[30] Sutherland S. Floral sex ratios, fruit-set, and resource allocation in plants[J]. Ecology, 1986, 67(4):991-1001.
[31] Lloyd DG, Schoen DJ. Self-and cross-fertilization in plants.Ⅰ. Functional dimensions[J]. Int J Plant Sci, 1992, 153(3):358-369.
[32] Carvallo GO, Medel R. Effects of herkogamy and inbreeding on the mating system of Mimulus luteus in the absence of pollinators[J]. Evol Ecol, 2010, 24(2):509-522.
[33] Karron JD, Jackson RT, Thumser NN, Schlicht SL. Outcrossing rates of individual Mimulus ringens genets are correlated with anther-stigma separation[J]. Heredity, 1997, 79(4):365.
[34] Sharma MV, Kuriakose G, Shivanna KR. Reproductive strategies of Strobilanthes kunthianus, an endemic, semelparous species in southern western Ghats, India[J]. Bot J Linn Soc, 2008, 157(1):155-163.
[35] Pérez-Crespo MJ, Ornelas JF, Martén-Rodríguez S, González-Rodríguez A, Lara C. Reproductive biology and nectar production of the Mexican endemic Psittacanthus auriculatus (Loranthaceae), a hummingbird-pollinated mistletoe[J]. Plant Biol, 2016, 18(1):73-83.
[36] Cruden RW. Pollen-ovule ratios:a conservative indicator of breeding systems in flowering plants[J]. Evolution, 1977, 31(1):32-46.
[37] Gibbs P, Milne C, Carrillo MV. Correlation between the breeding system and recombination index in five species of Senecio[J]. New Phytol, 1975, 75(3):619-626.
[38] Queller DC. Pollen-ovule ratios and hermaphrodite sexual allocation strategies[J]. Evolution, 1984, 38(5):1148-1151.
[39] Yang CF, Guo YH. Pollen-ovule ratio and gamete investment in Pedicularis (Orobanchaceae)[J]. J Integr Plant Biol, 2007, 49(2):238-245.
-
期刊类型引用(6)
1. 童嘉琳，楼姝坪，徐云敏，朱祝军，何勇. 植物miR396及其靶基因进化、功能与应用研究进展. 核农学报. 2024(03): 472-480 . 
百度学术
2. 高明刚，李明，段高飞，王滕飞，冯晓健，许瑞瑞. 苹果GRF基因家族在非生物胁迫下的表达分析. 西北农业学报. 2024(01): 141-147 . 百度学术
3. 孙龙飞，黄萍. 紫花苜蓿生长调节因子的全基因组鉴定及干旱胁迫下特征分析. 江苏农业科学. 2024(12): 45-52 . 百度学术
4. 周文杰，张文瀚，贾玮，许自成，黄五星. 植物miRNA响应非生物胁迫研究进展. 植物学报. 2024(05): 810-833 . 百度学术
5. 董家琦，吴淋慧，郑浩，张琼，钟彩虹. 高等植物性别分化的研究进展. 植物科学学报. 2024(05): 664-672 . 本站查看
6. 赵思航，刘昊东，徐渴，张树华，赵勇，杨学举. 小麦中MIR160基因家族的生物信息学分析及靶基因鉴定. 分子植物育种. 2023(01): 27-35 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(0)
计量
- 文章访问数: 867
- HTML全文浏览量: 2
- PDF下载量: 1107
- 被引次数: 6
下载:
