高级检索+

古尔班通古特沙漠水热梯度变化对短命植物生态化学计量特征影响

肖钰鑫, 王明明, 郭惠安, 彭港澳, 庄伟伟

肖钰鑫, 王明明, 郭惠安, 彭港澳, 庄伟伟. 古尔班通古特沙漠水热梯度变化对短命植物生态化学计量特征影响[J]. 植物科学学报, 2022, 40(4): 492-504. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2022.40492
引用本文: 肖钰鑫, 王明明, 郭惠安, 彭港澳, 庄伟伟. 古尔班通古特沙漠水热梯度变化对短命植物生态化学计量特征影响[J]. 植物科学学报, 2022, 40(4): 492-504. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2022.40492
Xiao Yu-Xin, Wang Ming-Ming, Guo Hui-An, Peng Gang-Ao, Zhuang Wei-Wei. Changes in ecological stoichiometry of two ephemeral plants with a hydrothermal gradient in the Gurbantünggüt Desert[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2022, 40(4): 492-504. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2022.40492
Citation: Xiao Yu-Xin, Wang Ming-Ming, Guo Hui-An, Peng Gang-Ao, Zhuang Wei-Wei. Changes in ecological stoichiometry of two ephemeral plants with a hydrothermal gradient in the Gurbantünggüt Desert[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2022, 40(4): 492-504. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2022.40492

古尔班通古特沙漠水热梯度变化对短命植物生态化学计量特征影响

基金项目: 

新疆维吾尔自治区重点实验室开放课题(2021D04003)

新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金(2021D01A123)

新疆特殊环境物种多样性应用与调控重点实验室开放课题(XJTSWZ-2022-02)

国家自然科学基金(42007092)。

详细信息
    作者简介:

    肖钰鑫(1999-),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为干旱区植物生理生态(E-mail:1620820306@qq.com)。

    通讯作者:

    庄伟伟,E-mail:zww8611@sina.com

  • 中图分类号: S718.5

Changes in ecological stoichiometry of two ephemeral plants with a hydrothermal gradient in the Gurbantünggüt Desert

Funds: 

This work was supported by grants from the Key Laboratory Opening Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (2021D04003),Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (2021D01A123),Open Project of Key Laboratory of Special Environment Biodiversity Application and Regulation in Xinjiang (XJTSWZ-2022-02),and National Natural Science Foundation of China (42007092).

undefined

undefined

undefined

  • 摘要: 以古尔班通古特沙漠2种优势短命植物尖喙牻牛儿苗(Erodium oxyrhinchum M. Bieb.)和东方旱麦草(Eremopyrum orientale (L.) Jaubert & Spach)为研究对象,通过盆栽控制实验,设定2个温度梯度以及3个水分梯度,对它们在不同温、湿度处理下的C、N、P含量及其化学计量比的变化特点进行分析。结果显示:(1)温度显著影响尖喙牻牛儿苗的N、P、C∶P、N∶P以及东方旱麦草的C、N、P、C∶N、N∶P;水分显著影响2种短命植物的N、P、C∶N、C∶P以及东方旱麦草的N∶P,其中N含量随温度的变化符合温度-生物地球化学假说,而P含量随温度的变化符合温度-植物生理假说。(2)温度和水分的交互作用对2种植物的影响表现为:在高温处理时,随着水分梯度的增加,2种植物的N、P含量先升高再下降,C∶N、C∶P、N∶P先下降再升高;在低温处理时,尖喙牻牛儿苗的N、P含量变化与水分梯度呈反比,C∶P变化与水分梯度呈正比,而东方旱麦草化学计量变化差异不显著。(3)相关性分析结果表明,温度和水分显著影响2种短命植物各元素之间的相关关系,植物的生长速率和养分限制情况受营养元素的主导调控也随之变化。
    Abstract: Two dominant ephemeral plants, i.e., Erodium oxyrhinchum M. Bieb. and Eremopyrum orientale (L.) Jaubert & Spach, from the Gurbantünggüt Desert were used for potted plant experiments under controlled conditions. We set two temperature gradients and three moisture gradients to analyze variation characteristics in carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and phosphorus (P) contents and their stoichiometric ratios under different temperature and humidity treatments. Results show that: (1) Temperature significantly affected N, P contents, C∶P, and N∶P in Erodium oxyrhinchum, and C, N, P, C∶N, and N∶P in Eremopyrum orientale. Water significantly affected N, P, C∶N, and C∶P in both plants and N∶P in Eremopyrum orientale. The changes in N content with temperature conformed to the temperature-biogeochemical hypothesis, while the changes in P content with temperature conformed to the temperature-plant physiology hypothesis. (2) Interactions between temperature and water also affected the plants. Under high temperature treatment, as the water gradient increased, N and P contents in both plants first increased and then decreased, while C∶N, C∶P, and N∶P first decreased and then increased. Under low temperature treatment, changes in N and P contents in Erodium oxyrhinchum were inversely proportional to the water gradient, while changes in C∶P were directly proportional to the water gradient. However, the stoichiometric changes in Eremopyrum orientale were not significant. (3) Correlation analysis showed that temperature and water significantly affected element correlations in both plants, and the growth rates and nutrient limitations of the plants were also subject to dominant regulation of the nutrient elements.
  • [1]

    Elser JJ, Sterner RW, Gorokhova E, Fagan WF, Markow TA, et al . Biological stoichiometry from genes to ecosystems[J]. Ecol Lett, 2000, 3(6): 540-550.

    [2] 郭浩, 庄伟伟, 李进. 古尔班通古特沙漠四种草本植物不同生长期C、N、P化学计量比的动态变化分析[J]. 植物科学学报, 2019, 37(3): 356-366.

    Guo H, Zhuang WW, Li J. Dynamic analysis of stoichiometric ratios of C, N, and P during different growth periods in four herbaceous plants from Gurbantünggüt Desert[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2019, 37(3): 356-366.

    [3] 田地, 严正兵, 方精云. 植物生态化学计量特征及其主要假说[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(7): 682-713.

    Tian D, Yan ZB, Fang JY. Review on the characteristics and main hypotheses of plant ecological stoichiometry[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2021, 45(7), 682-713.

    [4] 周晓兵, 陶冶, 张元明. 塔克拉玛干沙漠南缘荒漠绿洲过渡带不同土地利用影响下优势植物化学计量特征[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(5): 15-26.

    Zhou XB, Tao Y, Zhang YM. The C, N and P stoichiometry of dominant species in different land use types in a desert-oasis ecotone of the Southern Taklimakan Desert[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(5): 15-26.

    [5] 韩博, 李广, 卓玛草, 邵倩雄, 侯扶江. 燕麦碳氮磷含量及化学计量比对盐胁迫的响应[J]. 草业科学, 2020, 37(12): 2497-2506.

    Han B, Li G, Zhuomacao, Shao QX, Hou FJ. Changes in C,N,P content and stoichiometric ratios in response to salt stress in Avenasativa plants[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2020, 37(12): 2497-2506.

    [6]

    Agren GI. The C∶N∶P stoichiometry of autotrophs-theory and observations[J]. Ecol Lett, 2004, 7(3): 185-191.

    [7] 张珂, 何明珠, 李新荣, 谭会娟, 高艳红, 等. 阿拉善荒漠典型植物叶片碳、氮、磷化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(22): 6538-6547.

    Zhang K, He MZ, Li XR, Tan HJ, Gao YH, et al . Foliar carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry of typical desert plants across the Alashan Desert[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(22): 6538-6547.

    [8]

    Danger M, Gessner MO, Barlocher F. Ecological stoi-chiometry of aquatic fungi: current knowledge and perspectives[J]. Fungal Ecol, 2016, 19: 100-111.

    [9] 陈义堂. 不同密度杉木林各组分C、N和P含量及其化学计量特征[J]. 广西林业科学, 2021, 50(6): 657-664.

    Chen YT. Contents of C, N and P and C∶N∶P stoichiometric characteristic of cunninghamia lanceolata stands with different densities[J]. Guangxi Forestry Science, 2021, 50(6): 657-664.

    [10] 丁俊祥, 范连连, 李彦, 唐立松. 古尔班通古特沙漠6种荒漠草本植物的生物量分配与相关生长关系[J]. 中国沙漠, 2016, 36(5): 1323-1330.

    Ding JX, Fan LL, Li Y, Tang LS. Biomass allocation and allometric relationships of six desert herbaceous plants in the Gurbantunggut Desert[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2016, 36(5): 1323-1330.

    [11] 王雪芹, 蒋进, 雷加强, 赵从举. 短命植物分布与沙垄表层土壤水分的关系: 以古尔班通古特沙漠为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(4): 556-560.

    Wang XQ, Jiang J, Lei JQ, Zhao CJ. Relationship between ephemeral plants distribution and soil moisture on longitudinal dune surface in Gurbantunggut Desert[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2004, 15(4): 556-560.

    [12]

    Lapointe L. How phenology influences physiology in deciduous forest spring ephemerals[J]. Physiol Plantarum, 2001, 113(2): 151-157.

    [13] 何茂松, 罗艳, 彭庆文, 严正兵, 杨思琪, 等. 新疆45种荒漠植物粗根碳、氮、磷计量特征及其与环境的关系[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(9): 2603-2614.

    He MS, Luo Y, Peng QW, Yan ZB, Yang SQ, et al . Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry in the coarse roots of 45 desert plant species in relation to environmental factors across the deserts in Xinjiang[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2019, 38(9): 2603-2614.

    [14] 智颖飙, 刘珮, 马慧, 路战远, 崔艳,等. 中国荒漠植物生态化学计量学特征与驱动因素[J]. 内蒙古大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 48(1): 97-105.

    Zhi YB, Liu P, Ma H, Lu ZY, Cui Y, et al . The eco-stoichiometric characteristics and driving factors of desert plants in China[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia University (Natural Science Edition), 2017, 48(1): 97-105.

    [15] 文春燕, 朱嘉磊, 薄慧娟, 宋莲君, 聂立水. 不同水氮处理下毛白杨碳氮磷化学计量特征[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2019, 25(2): 254-261.

    Wen CY, Zhu JL, Bo HJ, Song LJ, Nie LS. Effects of irrigation and nitrogen application on carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus stoichiometry of Populus tomentosa [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2019, 25(2): 254-261.

    [16]

    Zhou XB, Zhang YM, Ji XH, Downing A, Serpe M. Combined effects of nitrogen deposition and water stress on growth and physiological responses of two annual desert plants in northwestern China[J]. Environ Exp Bot, 2011, 74: 1-8.

    [17] 周晓兵, 张元明, 王莎莎, 张丙昌, 张静. 3种荒漠植物幼苗生长和光合生理对氮增加的响应[J]. 中国沙漠, 2011, 31(1): 82-89.

    [FQ(+8mm。46,ZX,DY-W][FQ)][HT6] Zhou XB, Zhang YM, Wang SS, Zhang BC, Zhang J. Effect of nitrogen input on growth and photosynthetic physiology of three desert species seedlings[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2011, 31(1): 82-89.

    [18] 孙羽, 张涛, 田长彦, 李晓林, 冯固. 增加降水对荒漠短命植物当年牧草生长及群落结构的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(4): 1859-1868.

    Sun Y, Zhang T, Tian CY, Li XL, Feng G. Response of grass growth and productivity to enhanced water input in ephemeral desert grassland in Gurbantunggut desert[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(4): 1859-1868.

    [19] 刘建国, 刘卫国, 朱媛媛, 霍举颂, 玛丽娅·奴尔兰. 古尔班通古特沙漠某些短命植物叶片N、P化学计量特征的季节变化[J]. 植物学报, 2017, 52(6): 756-763.

    Liu JG, Liu WG, Zhu YY, Huo JS, Nurlan M. Seasonal variation of N and P stoichiometric characteristics in leaves of certain ephemeral plants in the Gurbantunggut Desert, China[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2017, 52(6): 756-763.

    [20] 白柳, 崔媛媛, 刘倬彤, 门欣洋, 侯东杰, 等. 放牧对荒漠草原优势植物叶片养分含量和化学计量特征的影响[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2021, 42(6): 56-62.

    Bai L, Cui YY, Liu ZT, Men XY, Hou DJ, et al . Effects of grazing on leaf nutrient content and stoichiometric characteristics of dominant plants in desert steppe[J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2021, 42(6): 56-62.

    [21] 陆姣云, 杨惠敏, 田宏, 张鹤山, 熊军波, 等. 水分对不同生育时期紫花苜蓿茎叶碳、氮、磷含量及化学计量特征的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2021, 43(6): 25-34.

    Lu JY, Yang HM, Tian H, Zhang HS, Xiong JB, et al . Effect of water addition on carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations, and stoichiometric characteristics of alfalfa stems and leaves at different growth stage[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2021, 43(6): 25-34.

    [22] 王凯, 沈潮, 宋立宁, 吕林有, 张大鹏. 持续干旱下沙地樟子松幼苗C、N、P化学计量变化规律[J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(7): 2175-2184.

    Wang K, Shen C, Song LN, Lü LY, Zhang DP. Variations in C, N and P stoichiometry of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica seedlings under continuous drought[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2020, 39(7): 2175-2184.

    [23] 杨福春. 不同增温方式对杉木幼林叶片碳代谢的影响研究[D]. 福州: 福建师范大学, 2018: 1-3.
    [24]

    Chaves MM, Flexas J, Pinheiro C. Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell[J]. Ann Bot-London, 2009, 103(4): 551-560.

    [25]

    Hendrick RL, Pregitzer KS. Temporal and depth-related patterns of fine root dynamics in northern hardwood forests[J]. J Ecol, 1996, 84: 167-176.

    [26]

    Yan ZB, Li P, Chen YH, Han WX, Fang JY. Nutrient allocation strategies of woody plants: an approach from the scaling of nitrogen and phosphorus between twig stems and leaves[J]. Sci Rep-UK, 2016, 6(1): 20099.

    [27] 宋良翠, 马维伟, 李广, 刘帅楠, 陆刚. 温度变化对尕海湿地不同退化梯度土壤氮矿化的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(9): 27-37.

    Song LC, Ma WW, Li G, Liu SN, Lu G. Effect of temperature changes on nitrogen mineralization in soils with diffe-rent degradation gradients in Gahai Wetland[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(9): 27-37.

    [28]

    Han WX, Fang JY, Guo DL, Zhang Y. Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across 753 terrestrial plant species in China[J]. New Phytol, 2005, 168(2): 377-385.

    [29]

    Reich PB, Oleksyn J. Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2004, 101(30): 11001-11006.

    [30]

    Kellogg LE, Bridgham SD. Phosphorus retention and movement across an mbrotrophic-minerotrophic peatland gradient[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2003, 63(3): 299-315.

    [31] 牛得草, 李茜, 江世高, 常佩静, 傅华. 阿拉善荒漠区6种主要灌木植物叶片C∶ N∶ P化学计量比的季节变化[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(4): 317-325.

    Niu DC, Li Q, Jiang SG, Chang PJ, Fu H. Seasonal variations of leaf C∶N∶P stoichiometry of six shrubs in desert of China’s Alxa Plateau[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2013, 37(4): 317-325.

    [32] 李茜, 曹扬, 彭守璋, 陈云明. 子午岭林区两种天然次生林叶片C、N、P化学计量特征的季节变化[J]. 水土保持学报, 2017, 31(6): 319-325.

    Li X, Cao Y, Peng SZ, Chen YM. Seasonal variations of C, N and P stoichiometric characteristics in leaves of two natural secondary forests in Ziwuling forest district[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 31(6): 319-325.

    [33] 石莎, 陈春, 韩航, 李征珍, 单凌飞, 等. 蒙古沙冬青和霸王两种孑遗植物化学计量特征与生态适应性[J]. 云南大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 40(5): 1042-1052.

    Shi S, Chen C, Han H, Li ZZ, Shan LF, et al . The stoi-chiometry and ecological adaptability of two relict plants Ammopiptanthus mongolicus and Zygophyllum xanthoxylon [J]. Journal of Yunnan University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2018, 40(5): 1042-1052.

    [34] 任书杰, 于贵瑞, 姜春明, 方华军, 孙晓敏. 中国东部南北样带森林生态系统102个优势种叶片碳氮磷化学计量学统计特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(3): 581-586.

    Ren SJ, Yu GR, Jiang CM, Fang HJ, Sun XM. Stoichiometric characteristics of leaf carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus of 102 dominant species in forest ecosystems along the North-South Transect of East China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2012, 23(3): 581-586.

    [35] 王凯, 沈潮, 孙冰, 王潇楠, 魏东, 等. 干旱胁迫对科尔沁沙地榆树幼苗C、N、P化学计量特征的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(7): 2286-2294.

    Wang K, Shen C, Sun B, Wang XN, Wei D, et al . Effects of drought stress on C, N and P stoichiometry of Ulmus pumila seedlings in Horqin sandy land, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(7): 2286-2294.

    [36] 杨明飞. 我国北方干旱至半湿润区分布的植物叶碳氮磷化学计量特征研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2017: 8.
    [37]

    Cramer MD, Hawkins HJ, Verboom GA. The importance of nutritional regulation of plant water flux[J]. Oecologia, 2009, 161(1): 15-24.

    [38]

    Sanaullah M, Rumpel C, Charrier X, Chabbi A. How does drought stress influence the decomposition of plant litter with contrasting quality in a grassland ecosystem? [J]. Plant Soil, 2012, 352(1/2): 277-288.

    [39] 马俊峰. 不同灌溉上限对日光温室甜椒幼苗生长与干物质积累的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2020(17): 54-60.

    Ma JF. Effects of different irrigation maximum on growth dynamics and dry matter accumulation of sweet pepper seedling in greenhouse[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2020(17): 54-60.

    [40]

    Aerts R. Nutrient resorption from senescing leaves of perennials: are there general patterns?[J]. Ecology, 1996, 84(4): 597-608.

    [41]

    Zhu JL, Bo HJ, Li X, Song LJ, Wang J, et al . Effects of soil water and nitrogen on the stand volume of four hybrid Populus tomentosa clones[J]. Forests, 2017, 8(7): 250.

    [42] 高巧静, 朱文琰, 侯将将, 王娅琳, 赵新全, 等. 放牧强度对高寒草甸植物叶片生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2019, 41(3): 45-50.

    Gao QJ, Zhu WY, Hou JJ, Wang YL, Zhao XQ, et al . Effects of grazing intensity on ecostoichiometric characte-ristics of plant leaves in alpine meadow[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2019, 41(3): 45-50.

    [43]

    Knecht MF, Göransson A. Terrestrial plants require nutrients in similar proportions[J]. Tree Physiol, 2004, 24(4): 447-460.

  • 期刊类型引用(2)

    1. 王强,杨鸿淋,徐春晖,杨玉莲,屈巧欣,康四岚,李佳芯,吴庆贵. 涪江中游4种造林树种碳氮磷化学计量及养分重吸收特征. 四川农业大学学报. 2023(03): 437-445 . 百度学术
    2. 杨欢,何学敏,热依汗·阿布力孜,李进宝,胡其荣,巴合别勒德. 小叶碱蓬和白麻土壤—叶片生态化学计量学特征对不同盐生境的响应. 水土保持通报. 2023(05): 45-52 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(2)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  235
  • HTML全文浏览量:  3
  • PDF下载量:  108
  • 被引次数: 4
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-12-08
  • 修回日期:  2022-02-12
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-10-31
  • 发布日期:  2022-08-27

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回