Advance Search
Guo Hao, Zhuang Wei-Wei, Li Jin. Dynamic analysis of stoichiometric ratios of C, N, and P during different growth periods in four herbaceous plants from Gurbantünggüt Desert[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2019, 37(3): 356-366. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2019.30356
Citation: Guo Hao, Zhuang Wei-Wei, Li Jin. Dynamic analysis of stoichiometric ratios of C, N, and P during different growth periods in four herbaceous plants from Gurbantünggüt Desert[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2019, 37(3): 356-366. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2019.30356

Dynamic analysis of stoichiometric ratios of C, N, and P during different growth periods in four herbaceous plants from Gurbantünggüt Desert

Funds: 

This work was supported by grants from the Project Supported by Key Discipline-Biology Subject Bidding Project of Xinjiang Normal University (18SDKD0203), University Research Program Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (XJEDU2018Y034), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (41763009).

More Information
  • Received Date: November 06, 2018
  • Revised Date: December 06, 2018
  • Available Online: October 31, 2022
  • Published Date: June 27, 2019
  • To study the dynamic changes in C, N, and P content and stoichiometric ratios in desert plants during different growing periods, four desert herbaceous plants, (i.e., Agriophyllum squarrosum (L.) Moq., Bassia dasyphylla (Fisch.et Mey.) O. Kuntze, Ceratocarpus arenarius L., and Suaeda glauca (Bge.) Bge.), widely distributed in Gurbantünggüt Desert, were selected. Results indicated that:Seasonal dynamics of leaf C, N, and P content and C:N, C:P, and N:P mass ratios in the four herbaceous plants showed different trends throughout the whole growth period. The variation coefficients of each index during the different growth periods also demonstrated significant differences among species. Seasonal variation analysis of leaf C, N, and P content and their stoichiometric ratios showed that seasonal variations in N and P content and C:N and N:P ratios were larger, whereas variations in C and C:P were smaller. The seasonal variation coefficients of C and C:P in the four herbaceous species ranged from 2.43% to 15.80% and from 6.77% to 18.67%, respectively. Moreover, N and P content as well as the C:N and N:P ratios ranged from 21.26%-34.38%, 11.18%-30.26%, 18.52%-27.11%, and 14.90%-25.91%, respectively. The variation coefficients of C, N, and P content and stoichiometric ratios in the four herbaceous plants during the entire growth period were sorted as:N (30.00%) > C:N (22.87%) > N:P (20.12%) > P (17.76%) > C:P (11.72%) > C (9.02%). Overall, results showed that changes in C, N, and P content and stoichiometric ratios were significantly correlated with their growth periods and plant species.
  • [1]
    González-Alcaraz MN, Egea C, Jiménez-Cárceles FJ, Párraga I, María-Cervantes A, et al. Storage of organic carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in the soil-plant system of Phragmites australis stands from a eutrophicated Mediterranean salt marsh[J]. Geoderma, 2012, 185-186:61-72.
    [2]
    刘建国, 刘卫国, 朱媛媛, 霍举颂, 玛丽娅·奴尔兰. 古尔班通古特沙漠某些短命植物叶片N、P化学计量特征的季节变化[J]. 植物学报, 2017, 52(6):756-763.

    Liu JG, Liu WG, Zhu YY, Huo JS, Maria·Nurlan. Seasonal variation of N and P stoichiometric characteristics in leaves of certain ephemeral plants in the Gurbantunggut Desert, China[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2017, 52(6):756-763.
    [3]
    姜沛沛, 曹扬, 陈云明. 陕西省森林群落乔灌草叶片和凋落物C、N、P生态化学计量特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(2):365-372.

    Jiang PP, Cao Y, Chen YM. C, N, P stoichiometric characteristics of tree, shrub, herb leaves and litter in forest community of Shaanxi Province, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(2):365-372.
    [4]
    周晓兵, 陶冶, 张元明. 塔克拉玛干沙漠南缘荒漠绿洲过渡带不同土地利用影响下优势植物化学计量特征[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(5):15-26.

    Zhou XB, Tao Y, Zhang YM. The C, N and P stoichiome-try of dominant species in different land use types in a desert oasis ecotone of the Southern Taklimakan desert[J]. Acta Pratacultural Science, 2008, 27(5):15-26.
    [5]
    吴统贵, 吴明, 刘丽, 萧江华. 杭州湾滨海湿地3种草本植物叶片N、P化学计量学的季节变化[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(1):23-28.

    Wu TG, Wu M, Liu L, Xiao JH. Seasonal variations of leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry of three herbaceous species in Hangzhou Bay coastal wetlands, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(1):23-28.
    [6]
    王绍强, 于贵瑞. 生态系统碳氮磷元素的生态化学计量学特征[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(8):3937-3947.

    Wang SQ, Yu GR. Ecological stoichiometry characteristics of ecosystem carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus elements[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(8):3937-3947.
    [7]
    唐高溶, 郑伟, 王祥, 朱亚琼. 旅游对喀纳斯景区植被和土壤碳、氮、磷化学计量特征的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2016, 36(8):1476-1485.

    Tang GR, Zheng GW, Wang X, Zhu YQ. Effects of tourism disturbance on the ecological stoichiometry characteristics of C, N and P of the vegetation and soil in Kanas scenic area[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2016, 36(8):1476-1485.
    [8]
    李玮, 郑子成, 李廷轩. 不同植茶年限土壤团聚体碳氮磷生态化学计量学特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(1):9-16.

    Li W, Zheng ZC, Li TX. Ecological stoichiometry of soil carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus within soil aggregates in tea plantations with different ages[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(1):9-16.
    [9]
    张蕾蕾, 钟全林, 程栋梁, 费玲, 李静, 等. 刨花楠相对生长速率下林木叶片氮磷的适应特征[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(9):2607-2613.

    Zhang LL, Zhong QL, Cheng DL, Fei L, Li J, et al. Biomass relative growth rate of Machilus pauhoi in relation to leaf carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorous stoichiometry properties[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(9):2607-2613.
    [10]
    Kerkhoff AJ, Enquist BJ, Elser JJ, Fagan WF. Plant allometry, stoichiometry and the temperature-dependence of primary productivity[J]. Global Ecol Biogeogr, 2005, 14(6):585-598.
    [11]
    Aerts R, Chapin Ⅲ FS. The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited:a re-evaluation of processes and patterns[J]. Adv Ecol Res, 1999, 30:1-67.
    [12]
    傅思华, 胡顺军, 李浩, 王泽锋. 古尔班通古特沙漠南缘梭梭(Haloxylon ammodendron)群落优势植物水分来源[J]. 中国沙漠, 2018, 38(5):1024-1032.

    Fu SH, Hu SJ, Li H, Wang ZF. Water sources of dominant plants in Haloxylon ammodendron community at the southern edge of the Guerbantonggu desert[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2018, 38(5):1024-1032.
    [13]
    陶冶, 吴甘霖, 刘耀斌, 张元明. 古尔班通古特沙漠典型灌木群落土壤化学计量特征及其影响因素[J]. 中国沙漠, 2017, 37(2):305-314.

    Tao Y, Wu GL, Liu YB, Zhang YM. Soil stoichiometric and three influencing factors of typical shrub communities in Gubantunggut desert[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2017, 37(2):305-314.
    [14]
    陶冶, 张元明. 3种荒漠植物群落物种组成与丰富度的季节变化及地上生物量特征[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(6):1-11.

    Tao Y, Zhang YM. Seasonal changes in species composition, richness and the aboveground biomass of three community types in Gurbantunggut desert, northwestern China[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(6):1-11.
    [15]
    张立运, 陈昌笃. 论古尔班通古特沙漠植物多样性的一般特点[J]. 生态学报, 2002, 22(11):1923-1932.

    Zhang LY, Chen CD. On the general characteristics of plant diversity of Gurbantunggut sandy desert[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2002, 22(11):1923-1932.
    [16]
    努尔古丽·阿木提. 新疆藜科植物系统分类学研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐:新疆大学, 2013.

    Nuerguli·Amuti. Systematic studay on the taxonomy of Chenopodiaceae from Xinjiang[D]. Urumqi:Xinjiang University, 2013.
    [17]
    肖遥, 陶冶, 张元明. 古尔班通古特沙漠4种荒漠草本植物不同生长期的生物量分配与叶片化学计量特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(9):929-940.

    Xiao Y, Tao Y, Zhang YM. Biomass allocation and leaf stoichiometric characteristics in four desert herbaceous plants during different growth periods in the Gurbantunggut desert, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2014, 38(9):929-940.
    [18]
    刘珮, 马慧, 智颖飙, 崔艳, 孙安安, 等. 9种典型荒漠植物生态化学计量学特征分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2018, 35(1):207-216.

    Liu P, Ma H, Zhi YB, Cui Y, Sun AA, et al. Ecological stoichiometric differences of nine typical eremophyte species[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2018, 35(1):207-216.
    [19]
    郭洋, 盛建东, 陈波浪, 罗佳, 徐财发. 3种盐生植物干物质积累与养分吸收特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2016, 33(1):144-149.

    Guo Y, Sheng JD, Chen BL, Luo J, Xu CF. Study on dry matter accumulation and nutriention absorption of three halophytes under artificial planting condition[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2016, 33(1):144-149.
    [20]
    牛得草, 李茜, 江世高, 常佩静, 傅华. 阿拉善荒漠区6种主要灌木植物叶片C
    [24]
    孙力, 贡璐, 朱美玲, 解丽娜, 李红林, 等. 塔里木盆地北缘荒漠典型植物叶片化学计量特征及其与土壤环境因子的关系[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(5):1208-1214.

    Sun L, Gong L, Zhu ML, Xie LL, Li HL, et al. Leaf stoichiometric characteristics of typical desert plants and their relationships to soil environmental factors in the northern margin of the Tarin Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2017, 36(5):1208-1214.
    [25]
    牛得草, 董晓玉, 傅华. 长芒草不同季节碳氮磷生态化学计量特征[J]. 草业科学, 2011, 28(6):915-920.

    Niu DC, Dong XY, Fu H. Seasonal dynamics of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry in Stipa bungeana[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2011, 28(6):915-920.
    [26]
    罗艳, 贡璐, 朱美玲, 安申群. 塔里木河上游荒漠区4种灌木植物叶片与土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(24):8326-8335.

    Luo Y, Gong L, Zhu ML, An SQ. Stoichiometry characte-ristics of leaves and soil of four shrubs in the upper reaches of the Tarim River desert[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(24):8326-8335.
    [27]
    Koerselman W, Meuleman AFM. The vegetation N李红林, 贡璐, 洪毅. 克里雅绿洲旱生芦苇根茎叶C、N、P化学计量特征的季节变化[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(20):6547-6555.

    Li HL, Gong L, Hong Y. Seasonal variations in C, N, and P stoichiometry of roots, stems, and leaves of Phragmites australis in the Keriya Oasis, Xinjiang, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(20):6547-6555.
  • Related Articles

    [1]HU Guang-ming, XIA Wen-juan, ZHENG Li, RAO Hang-kong, LEI Ming, WANG Jian, ZHAO Ting-ting, LI Zuo-zhou, ZHONG Cai-hong. Investigation and fruit genetic diversity analysis of wild Actinidia germplasm resources in Tongshan County, Hubei Province[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2021, 39(6): 620-631. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2021.60620
    [2]Chen Mei-Yan, Zhao Ting-Ting, Liu Xiao-Li, Han Fei, Zhang Peng, Zhong Cai-Hong. Factor analysis and comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality of ‘Jinyan’ kiwifruit (Actinidia eriantha×Actinidia chinensis)[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2021, 39(1): 85-92. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2021.10085
    [3]WANG Rong, HE Zhi-Chong, FANG Xue-Min, CHEN Dan-Li, WANG Qi, MENG Jia-Song, ZHAO Da-Qiu. Analysis of Phenotypic Diversity of Paeonia lactiflora Cultivars in Yangzhou[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2016, 34(6): 901-908. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2016.60901
    [4]LIU Li-Yan, CAI Xin-Bin, JIANG Xiao-Heng, WAN Xian-Chong. Species Composition and Floral Components of Vascular Plants in Ganjiahu Nature Reserve of Xinjiang[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2016, 34(5): 695-704. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2016.50695
    [5]YANG Xiao-Hui, ZHAO Xue-Li, GAO Xin-Fen. Morphological Variation and ITS Sequence Analysis of the Indigofera szechuensis Complex[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2015, 33(6): 727-733. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2015.60727
    [6]CAI Jun-Long, LU Jin-Qing, LI Qiang, GUO Sheng-Nan, DAI Yi. Analysis on Volatile Components of Caryophylli Flos from Different Habitats[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2015, 33(2): 251-258. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2015.20251
    [7]CHEN Sui-Qing, SONG Jun, CUI Can. Research and Evaluation on Chemical Fingerprints of Diterpenoids from Rabdosia rubescens[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2012, 30(5): 519-527. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1142.2012.50519
    [8]SHU Xiao, YANG Zhi-Ling, YANG Xu, DUAN Hong-Ping, YU Hua-Hui, LIU Ruo-Nan. Variation in Traits of Magnolia officinalis Seedlings from Different Provenances and Their Principal Component Analysis[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2010, 28(5): 623-630.
    [9]PENG Ling, ZHU Bi-Feng. Analysis and Evaluation of the Nutritional Components of Fleshy Fruit and Fleshy Leaf in Camellia oleifera Abel.[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2010, 28(4): 486-490.
    [10]YUAN Ping, YUAN Xiao. Analysis on the Constituents of the Absolute Oil of Lysimachia foenum-graceum Hance and Study on the Application of the Insecticidal Activity of Its Components[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2007, 25(4): 417-420.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(24)

    1. 胡星,胡纪龙,张敏,刘娇,黄晓霞. 外源NO对盐胁迫下八角金盘叶片生理特性及解剖结构的影响. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学). 2025(01): 68-77 .
    2. 张伟溪,丁密,苏晓华,李爱平,王小江,余金金,李政宏,黄秦军,丁昌俊. 小叶杨×欧洲黑杨杂交F_1代生长及叶片解剖结构杂种优势分析与抗旱性评价. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2025(01): 46-58 .
    3. 赵莹. 叶形与叶色在园林景观设计中的应用. 分子植物育种. 2025(02): 622-627 .
    4. 邱彦芬,杨湉,吴裕. 基于叶片解剖结构评价不同倍性橡胶树无性系抗旱性. 热带农业科技. 2024(02): 61-67 .
    5. 萨其拉,张霞,朱琳,康萨如拉. 长期不同放牧强度下荒漠草原优势种无芒隐子草叶片解剖结构变化. 植物生态学报. 2024(03): 331-340 .
    6. 胡光明,肖涛,彭家清,李大卫,田华,王华玲,肖丽丽,程均欢,黄海雷,吴伟,钟彩虹. 基于叶片形态及显微特征评价12个猕猴桃栽培品种的抗旱性. 果树学报. 2024(05): 911-928 .
    7. 刘柯珍,何诚. 微观视角下防火树种特征研究动态. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学). 2024(03): 212-220 .
    8. 肖刚,赵峰,李世民,刘帅,路艳. 高速公路中央分隔带绿化植物对干旱胁迫的生理响应和抗旱性评价. 山东交通科技. 2024(03): 81-85 .
    9. 罗玲,刘伟,梁东,马一君,李然,吕秀兰. 不同架形对阳光玫瑰葡萄叶幕生态和高温下应逆生理的影响. 果树学报. 2024(12): 2444-2462 .
    10. 侯立伟,鲁绍伟,李少宁,赵娜,徐晓天. 城市绿化灌木耐旱性评价及灌溉制度研究进展. 世界林业研究. 2023(01): 45-51 .
    11. 孙一鑫,马乐乐,苗丽丽,何佳星,李建明. 基于光辐射时滞效应的温室番茄蒸腾量模型的构建. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(02): 83-92 .
    12. 何桥,向海洋,向芳,黄明,陈栋,向素琼,郭启高,梁国鲁,熊伟. 野生李用于巫山脆李砧木的适宜性研究. 西南大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(03): 74-87 .
    13. 马静,贺熙勇,陶亮,吴超,李志强,宫丽丹. 基于叶片解剖结构的澳洲坚果种质资源抗旱性评价. 热带作物学报. 2023(07): 1392-1399 .
    14. 仇杰,高超,罗洪发. 贵州西北喀斯特区古茶树叶片解剖结构及抗旱性评价. 西北植物学报. 2023(07): 1170-1184 .
    15. 董淑龙,马姜明,莫燕华,黎露. 红花檵木种质资源与应用研究综述. 广西林业科学. 2022(02): 290-297 .
    16. 董志君,高健洲,于晓南. 烯效唑对盆栽芍药生理特性及显微结构的影响. 北京林业大学学报. 2022(07): 117-125 .
    17. 王菲,程小毛,肖云龙,黄晓霞. 千家寨野生古茶树叶片解剖结构和化学组分计量特征对海拔梯度的适应. 生态学杂志. 2021(07): 1958-1968 .
    18. 景晨娟,陈雪峰,王端,季文章,武晓红. 三个李子品种叶片结构差异及其抗旱性分析. 北方园艺. 2021(15): 27-34 .
    19. 钟灶发,张利娟,高思思,彭婷. 干旱胁迫下4种柑橘砧木叶片细胞学特征及抗旱性比较. 园艺学报. 2021(08): 1579-1588 .
    20. 周荧,王頔,聂飞. 贵州省两个蓝莓品种组培苗和扦插苗干旱胁迫响应. 南方农业. 2021(20): 171-174+178 .
    21. 郭燕,张树航,李颖,张馨方,王广鹏. 中国板栗238份品种(系)叶片形态、解剖结构及其抗旱性评价. 园艺学报. 2020(06): 1033-1046 .
    22. 董章宏,尹亚梅,徐剑,李显煌,瞿绍宏,辛静,常晓勇,辛培尧. 滇杨雌、雄株茎叶解剖结构差异分析. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学). 2020(03): 502-510 .
    23. 谭莎,赖路伟,黄永芳,叶小萍,谭健彬,许雄坚. 3个山茶品种对干旱胁迫的生理响应. 亚热带植物科学. 2020(05): 335-339 .
    24. 崔杰,洪文君,刘俊,陈伟玉,何书奋,罗金环. 极小种群野生植物海南假韶子结构解剖特征研究. 广东农业科学. 2019(11): 31-36 .

    Other cited types(23)

Catalog

    Article views (754) PDF downloads (506) Cited by(47)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return