Advance Search
XI Qin, ZHAO Ting-Ning, ZHANG Cheng-Liang. Influence of Treatments on Pinus pumila Seed Viability[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2014, 32(4): 427-433. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1142.2014.40427
Citation: XI Qin, ZHAO Ting-Ning, ZHANG Cheng-Liang. Influence of Treatments on Pinus pumila Seed Viability[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2014, 32(4): 427-433. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1142.2014.40427
shu

Influence of Treatments on Pinus pumila Seed Viability

  • 1. Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China;

  • 2. Environmental Protection Research Institute of Light Industry, Beijing 100089, China

More Information
  • Received Date: March 16, 2014
  • Revised Date: May 28, 2014
  • Available Online: November 01, 2022
  • Published Date: August 29, 2014
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • In order to increase Pinus pumila seed viability, five treatments, namely, water soak, NaOH solution soak, PEG6000 (PEG, polyethylene glycol) solution soak, low-temperature, absorption of water and desiccation treatments, were used to explore factors that affect the viability of Pinus pumila seeds. Groups of each factor were tested under different concentrations, durations and temperatures, with indigo dyeing applied to measure seed viabilities. Results showed that the PEG6000 solution soak at 10% concentration, initial temperature of 60℃, and 36 h of soaking showed the most improved seed viability. Water soaking also enhanced the viability of the Pinus pumila seeds, as well as cryogenics and absorption of water and desiccation treatments. NaOH solution with concentrations of 4%-12% lowered seed viability. Testing revealed that the PEG6000 treatment was the most effective method for improving the viability of Pinus pumila, which can be applied to the cultivation and better utilization of Pinus pumila.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (17)
  • [1]
    林春芳, 崔克诚. 偃松资源开发利用[J]. 林业实用技术, 2002(1): 41-43.
    [2]
    陈丽培, 王国霞, 沈永宝. 油松种子萌发初始阶段的呼吸代谢[J]. 林业科学, 2012, 48(5): 150-153.
    [3]
    宫彦章, 吴彩琼. 不同水温浸种对边坡绿化种子的催芽效应[J]. 种子科技, 2011, 29(8): 23-24.
    [4]
    武亚敬, 张金香, 史靖, 钱金娥. 浸种对油松种子发芽的影响[J]. 河北农业科学, 2010, 14(4): 18-20.
    [5]
    张金香, 林艳, 武亚敬, 钱金娥. 油松浸种处理水温与浸种时间研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(34): 31-35.
    [6]
    陈鄂, 付朝辉. 不同预处理对湿地松种子活力的影响[J]. 湖南林业科技, 2009, 36(3): 22-24.
    [7]
    王永超, 郭素娟, 王文舒. 引发处理对华山松种子萌发及生理的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2011, 39(2): 21-23.
    [8]
    崔秀敏, 王秀峰, 杜宏斌. PEG引发种子的研究进展[J]. 塔里木农垦大学学报, 2000, 12(4): 47-52.
    [9]
    王晓丽, 曹子林, 朱霞. PEG处理对云南松种子发芽及其生理生化特性的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2012, 27(6): 16-19.
    [10]
    王存桂. 吸湿-回干处理对油松种子发芽率的影响[J]. 青海大学学报: 自然科学版, 2009, 27(3): 90-92.
    [11]
    张丽, 张露, 胡松竹.贮藏方法对不同种源毛红椿种子发芽能力的影响[J].林业科技开发, 2007, 21(4): 114-116.
    [12]
    贺军民, 佘小平. 提高人工老化番茄种子活力的研究[J].西北大学学报, 2000, 17 (2): 147-149.
    [13]
    吴敏, 薛立, 李燕. 种子吸湿-回干处理研究综述[J]. 种子, 2005, 24(4): 46-49.
    [14]
    曹帮华, 吴丽云, 杨娟. 低温预处理对刺槐种子活力和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 山东科学, 2005, 18(4): 48-51.
    [15]
    邓宝辉, 陈芳圆. 种子生活力与发芽率相关性的研究[J]. 种子, 1984(4): 18-20.
    [16]
    李源. 种子生活力染色速测[J]. 安徽林业, 1994(6): 16.
    [17]
    朱灿灿. 史锋厚, 沈永宝, 曹福亮. PEG处理对油松种子萌发的影响[J]. 种子, 2007(8): 63-67.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]Sun Xiaoyu, Chen Fangqing, Lü Kun, Liu Jinrong, Huang Yongwen, Liu Yangyun. Temporal and spatial variation of sexual reproduction in a remnant population of the endangered species Myricaria laxiflora (Franch.) P. Y. Zhang et Y. J. Zhang[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2024, 42(3): 304-313. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.23197
    [2]Reyihanguli · Xiadi, Yang Lei, Rumananmu · Nihemaiti, Jia Xian-De, Wu Li-Mei, Lü Hai-Ying. Distribution patterns of the soil seed bank of Crataegus songarica K. Koch with altitude in the western Tianshan wild fruit forest[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2023, 41(2): 172-182. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.22153
    [3]Gao Gui-Bin, Wen Xing, Wu Zhi-Zhuang, Zhong Hao, Pan Yan-Hong, Zhang Xiao-Ping. Quantitative characteristics and distribution patterns of rhizome branches of potted Phyllostachys praecox C. D. Chu et C. S. Chao ‘Prevernalis’ seedlings in different soils[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2022, 40(4): 565-575. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2022.40565
    [4]Huang Zhi-Hao, Zhou Xin, Zhang Xiao-Ran, Pu Zhen, Xing Shao-Hua. Relationship between the distribution of Phellodendron amurense and environmental factors in the Beijing area[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2017, 35(1): 56-63. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2017.10056
    [5]SHEN Heng-Lun, XU Yao-Yang, WANG Lan, ZHANG Min, KONG Ling-Hui, CAI Qing-Hua. Spatial and Temporal Variations of Phytoplankton in Danjiangkou Reservoir and its Affecting Factors[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2011, 29(6): 683-690.
    [6]LI Ying, ZHONG Zhang-Cheng. Differentiation of Soil Enzyme Activities in Different Soil-Heavenly Bamboo Systems[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2006, 24(2): 144-148.
    [7]ZHU Sheng-Chao. The Distributional Feature of Plant in Lishui Ecology Demonstration Area[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2002, 20(2): 113-118.
    [8]ZHANG Yun-Fei, YANG Chi, CHEN Jia-Kuan. Spatial-temporal Change of Landscape Structure in the Distribution Region of Tetraena mongolica[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2001, 19(1): 25-30.
    [9]Ding Yi, Feng Weiguo, Ding Xiaoming, Yuan Wenjing. STUDY ON RELATION BETWEEN THE ESTERASE ISOZYME ZYMOGRAM AND DISTRICT DISTRIBUTION OF CULTIVARS IN HUBEI BARLEY[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1998, 16(1): 5-10.
    [10]Ni Xueming, Zhou Yuanje, Yu Bin, Zhao Jiarong. ON THE GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE NYMPHAEALES[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1995, 13(2): 137-146.

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (935) PDF downloads (1647) Cited by()
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Related Articles
    Copyright © 2022 Plant Science Journal 鄂ICP备05004779号-3
    Address：No. 201, Jiufeng 1st Road, Donghu High tech Zone, WuhanPostal Code：430074

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return