Advance Search
ZHOU Meng-Li, ZHANG Qing, KANG Xin-Gang, GUO Wei-Wei, JI Lei, LI Cheng-Fu. Study on the Stability of Forest Communities Based on the Spatial Structure Index[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2016, 34(5): 724-733. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2016.50724
Citation: ZHOU Meng-Li, ZHANG Qing, KANG Xin-Gang, GUO Wei-Wei, JI Lei, LI Cheng-Fu. Study on the Stability of Forest Communities Based on the Spatial Structure Index[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2016, 34(5): 724-733. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2016.50724
shu

Study on the Stability of Forest Communities Based on the Spatial Structure Index

  • 1.

    Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China

  • 2. Wangqing Forestry Bureau of Jilin Province, Yanji, Jilin 133200, China

Funds: This work was supported by a grant from the "948" Projects of the National Forestry Bureau (2013-4-66).
More Information
  • Received Date: February 11, 2016
  • Revised Date: March 22, 2016
  • Published Date: October 27, 2016
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • This study was carried out in three forest communities (polar-birch secondary forest, spruce-fir mixed forest and spruce-fir near pristine forest). Based on the Cobb-Douglas production function theory in microeconomics, the production function of the spatial structure of the forests was constructed with three commonly used stand spatial structure indices (mingling degree, neighborhood comparison, and uniform angle index) as inputs and the forest spatial structure as output. The forest spatial structure index (FSSI) was defined and the forest spatial structure distance (FSSD) was calculated. To evaluate the stability of each successional stage, the 5 indices were analyzed and the spatial structure characteristics of the forest communities in different successional stages were compared. Results indicated that the mingling degree of forest communities in different successional stages was diverse. The average mingling degree was highest for the spruce-fir near pristine forest (0.81), followed by that of the spruce-fir mixed forest, and lastly that of the polar-birch secondary forest. Neighborhood comparison had little effect on the spatial structure of the forest communities in different successional stages, and values ranged from 0.49-0.52. Horizontal distribution of the three forest communities indicated random distribution for spruce-fir mixed forest and spruce-fir near pristine forest and aggregated distribution for polar-birch secondary forest. The spatial structure index size and degree of closeness to the ideal structure was in the order spruce-fir near pristine forest >spruce-fir mixed forest >polar-birch secondary forest. Thus, both the spatial structure and stability of the spruce-fir near pristine forest were the best.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (26)
  • [1]
    王国宏. 再论生物多样性与生态系统的稳定性[J].生物多样性, 2002, 10(1):126-134. Wang GH. Further thoughts on diversity and stability in ecosystems[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2002, 10(1):126-134.
    [2]
    MacArthur R. Fluctuations of animal populations and a measure of community stability[J]. Ecology, 1995, 36(3):533-536.
    [3]
    Tilman D. Biodiversity:population versus ecosystem stability[J]. Ecology, 1996, 77(2):350-363.
    [4]
    Grimm V, Schmidt E, Wissel C. On the application of stability concepts in ecology[J]. Ecol Model, 1992, 63(1-4):143-161.
    [5]
    惠刚盈, 胡艳波. 混交林树种空间隔离程度表达方式的研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2001, 14(1):23-27. Hui GY, Hu YB. Measuring species spatial isolation in mixed forests[J]. Forest Research, 2001, 14(1):23-27.
    [6]
    惠刚盈. 角尺度——一个描述林木个体分布格局的结构参数[J]. 林业科学, 1999, 35(1):37-42. Hui GY. The neighbourhood pattern-A new structure parameter for describing distribution of forest tree position[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 1999, 35(1):37-42.
    [7]
    张会儒, 唐守正. 森林生态采伐理论[J].林业科学, 2008, 44(10):127-131. Zhang HR, Tang SZ. Theory of eclogy-based forest harvesting[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2008, 44(10):127-131.
    [8]
    叶芳, 彭世揆. 种群空间分布理论的发展历史及其现状[J]. 林业资源管理, 1997(6):55-58. Ye F, Peng SK. The development history and current situation of population spatial distribution theory[J]. Forestry Resource Management, 1997(6):55-58.
    [9]
    许涵, 李意德, 骆土寿, 林明献, 陈德祥, 莫锦华, 罗文, 洪小江, 蒋忠亮. 尖峰岭热带山地雨林不同更新林的群落特征[J]. 林业科学, 2009, 45(1):14-20. Xu H, Li YD, Luo TS, Lin MX, Chen DX, Mo JH, Luo W, Hong XJ, Jiang ZL. Community structure characteristics of tropical montane rain forests with different regeneration types in Jianfengling[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2009, 45(1):14-20.
    [10]
    Tilman D. Causes, consequences and ethics of biodiversity[J]. Nature, 2000, 405:208-211.
    [11]
    Tilman D, Reich PB, Knops J, Wedin D, Mielke T, Lehman C. Diversity and productivity in a long-term grassland experiment[J]. Science, 2001, 294:843-845.
    [12]
    刘国城. 生态系统复杂性怎样导致稳定性?[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 1992, 19(6):9-14. Liu GC. How can the complexity result in the stability in ecosystem?[J]. Jouranl of Northest Forestry University, 1992, 19(6):9-14.
    [13]
    闫东锋, 李纪亮, 何瑞珍, 韩磊, 郭欢欢. 宝天曼栎类天然次生林群落稳定性研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2006, 21(5):69-73. Yan DF, Li JL, He RZ, Han L, Guo HH. Community stability of oak natural secondary forest in Baotianman Nature Reserve[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2006, 21(5):69-73.
    [14]
    郭其强, 张文辉, 曹旭平. 基于模糊综合评判的森林群落稳定性评价体系模型构建——以黄龙山主要森林群落为例[J]. 林业科学, 2009, 45(10):19-24. Guo QQ, Zhang WH, Cao XP. Establishment of an evaluation model of the forest community stability based on fuzzy synthetic evaluation:A case study of main forest communities in Huanglong Mountians[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2009, 45(10):19-24.
    [15]
    李荣, 张文辉, 何景峰, 周建云. 不同间伐强度对辽东栎林群落稳定性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(1):14-20. Li R, Zhang WH, He JF, Zhou JY. Effects of thinning intensity on community stability of Quercus Iiaotungensis forest on Loess Plateau[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 22(1):14-20.
    [16]
    吴金卓, 蔡小溪, 林文树, 孔琳琳, 彭萱亦. 吉林蛟河不同演替阶段针阔混交林木本植物α多样性评价[J]. 林业科技开发, 2015, 29(3):128-132. Wu JZ, Cai XX, Lin WS, Kong LL, Peng XY. α biodiversity evaluation for the conifer and broad-leaved mixed forests at different successional stages in Jiaohe, Jilin Province[J]. China Forestry Science and Technology, 2015, 29(3):128-132.
    [17]
    吴初平, 张骏, 沈爱华, 朱锦茹, 袁位高, 江波. 千岛湖次生林不同演替阶段林分空间结构研究[J]. 植物研究, 2015, 35(1):16-21. Wu CP, Zhang J, Shen AH, Zhu JR, Yuan WG, Jiang B. Stand spatial structure at different successional stages of secondary forest in Qiandao Lake region[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2015, 35(1):16-21.
    [18]
    董灵波, 刘兆刚, 马妍, 倪宝龙, 李元. 天然林林分空间结构综合指数的研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2013, 35(1):16-22. Dong LB, Liu ZG, Ma Y, Ni BL, Li Y. A new composite index of stand spatial structure for natural forest[J]. Joural of Beijing Forestry University, 2013, 35(1):16-22.
    [19]
    赵俊卉. 长白山云冷杉混交林生长模型的研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2010. Zhao JH. Growth modeling for Spruce-Fir forest in Changbai mountains[D]. Beijing:Beijing Forestry University, 2010.
    [20]
    Pretzsch H. Analysis and modeling of spatial stand structures methodological considerations based on mixed beech-larch stands in Lower Saxony[J]. Forest Ecol Manag, 1997, 3:237-253.
    [21]
    王秋实. 微观经济学原理[M]. 北京:经济管理出版社, 2001:183-196. Wang QS. Principles of Microeconomics[M]. Beijing:Economic Management Publishing House, 2001:183-196.
    [22]
    安慧君. 阔叶红松林空间结构的研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 200 An HJ. Study on the spatial structure of the broad-leaved Korean pine forest[D]. Beijing:Beijing Forestry University, 2003.
    [23]
    Gadow KV, Hui GY. Characterizing forest spatial structure and diversity[C]//Proceedings of the SUFOR International Workshop "Sustainable Forestry in Temperate Regions". Sweden:Lund University, 2002.
    [24]
    胡艳波, 惠刚盈, 戚继忠, 安慧君, 郝广明. 吉林蛟河天然红松林的空间结构分析[J]. 林业科学研究, 2003, 16(5):523-530. Hu YB, Hui GY, Qi GZ, An HJ, Hao GM. Analysis of the spatial structure of natural Korean Pine broad leaved forest[J]. Forest Research, 2003, 16(5):523-530.
    [25]
    何列艳, 亢新刚, 范小莉, 高延, 冯启祥. 长白山区林下主要灌木生物量估算与分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2011, 35(5):45-50. He LY, Kang XG, Fan XL, Gao Y, Feng QX. Estimation and analysis of understory shrub biomass in Changbai mountains[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Science Edition, 2011, 35(5):45-50.
    [26]
    张梦弢, 张青, 亢新刚, 杨应军, 徐光, 张立新. 长白山云冷杉林不同演替阶段群稳定性[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(6):1609-1616. Zhang MT, Zhang Q, Kang XG, Yang YJ, Xu G, Zhang LX. Community stability for Spruce-fir forest at different succession stages in Changbai mountains, Northeast China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(6):1609-1616.
    • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 潘俊桥，张茜，石万磊，黄海泉，黄美娟. 川西凤仙花属植物资源调查与评价. 北方园艺. 2024(06): 44-51 .
    2. 石万磊. 凤仙花科种质资源研究现状. 南方农机. 2024(12): 159-161+171 .
    3. 徐金杰，邢震，孙晶远，郭星宇，王伟. α-萘乙酸对林芝凤仙花扦插的作用研究. 高原农业. 2022(01): 67-72 .
    4. 余爽，李美君，袁桃花，任柳伊，白新祥. 贵州省野生凤仙花属植物物种多样性与地理分布. 西北植物学报. 2021(05): 863-871 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (1047) PDF downloads (1046) Cited by(4)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Copyright © 2022 Plant Science Journal 鄂ICP备05004779号-3
    Address：No. 201, Jiufeng 1st Road, Donghu High tech Zone, WuhanPostal Code：430074

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return