Advance Search
Fan Guoqiang, Tan Kehui. STUDY ON THE INHIBITORY EFFECT OF LONGDAY TREATMENT ON PHARBITIS NIL Ⅱ.THE RELATION BETWEEN DIFFERENT DARK LENGTH PHOTOPERIODS AND FLOWER BUD DIFFERENTIATION AND GENE EXPRESSION IN THE COTYLEDONS[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1997, 15(3): 228-232.
Citation: Fan Guoqiang, Tan Kehui. STUDY ON THE INHIBITORY EFFECT OF LONGDAY TREATMENT ON PHARBITIS NIL Ⅱ.THE RELATION BETWEEN DIFFERENT DARK LENGTH PHOTOPERIODS AND FLOWER BUD DIFFERENTIATION AND GENE EXPRESSION IN THE COTYLEDONS[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1997, 15(3): 228-232.

STUDY ON THE INHIBITORY EFFECT OF LONGDAY TREATMENT ON PHARBITIS NIL Ⅱ.THE RELATION BETWEEN DIFFERENT DARK LENGTH PHOTOPERIODS AND FLOWER BUD DIFFERENTIATION AND GENE EXPRESSION IN THE COTYLEDONS

More Information
  • Received Date: March 10, 1995
  • Revised Date: June 09, 1996
  • Published Date: August 23, 1997
  • The growth of Pharbitis nil was promoted and its flowering was inhibitedwhen the dark length of single photoperiod was less than12 h.The results of 2-SDS-PAGE indicated that two kinds of proteins (pI4.1, MW16.5 kD; PI4.2, MW16.5 kD)existed in cotyledons.These proteins were disappeared in the cotyledon treated with induced photoperiod when the light length was over 12 h.Poly(A+)mRNA in the cotyledons with continuous light treatment (l CL) whose protein weight in vitro translationwas 17.4 kD was not discovered in the one treated with induced photoperiod (lSD).These changes in the Pharbitis nil cotyledons might be related to inhibiting the flowerbud differentiation.
  • Related Articles

    [1]Chu Le-Le, Liu Hai-Qiang, Sheng Xing-Xing, Zheng Wei-Xuan, Gong Zan, Hu Chun-Gen, Zhang Jin-Zhi. Research progress on the pathways and regulation of flowering transformation in fruit trees[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2022, 40(2): 281-290. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2022.20281
    [2]LIANG Qian-Long, WANG Chang-Bao, MA Xiang-Guang, ZHAO Cai, HE Xing-Jin. Chromosomal Study on Chinese Bupleurum L.(Apiaceae)[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2013, 31(1): 11-22. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1142.2013.10011
    [3]ZHENG Xia, GAO Xin-Fen, XU Bo, TU Wei-Guo. Chromosomal Studies on Seven Species of Indigofera L.[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2011, 1(4): 417-422.
    [4]Cheng Lin, Zhang Yiaojia. CHROMOSOME NUMBER AND KARYOTYPE OF EREMURUS CHINENSIS FEDTSCH.[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1993, 11(3): 281-282.
    [5]Yang Ji, Wang Jinwu, Li Maoxue. CYTOTAXONOMIC STUDIES ON THE GENUS POLYGONATUM Ⅲ. Chromosome numbers and karyotypes of 6 species from China[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1992, 10(3): 201-206.
    [6]Wang Hanping, Zhang Shouzhou. CHROMOSOME STUDIES ON FIVE SPECIES OF CARYOPHYLLACEAE PLANTS[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1992, 10(2): 179-181.
    [7]Tian Xianhua, Zhu Bicai, Zhu Changqi. AN OBSERVATION ON THE CHROMOSOME NUMBERS AND KARYOTYPES OF TWO SPECIES OF LYSIMACHIA[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1990, 8(4): 390-392.
    [8]Cao Rui, Zhang Shouzhou. STUDIES ON THE CHROMOSOME NUMBERS AND KARYOTYPES OF TWO SPECIES OF ARTEMISIA[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1990, 8(1): 8-12.
    [9]Ge Chuanji, Li Yankun, Hsu Pingsheng. EXAMINATION OF CHROMOSOME NUMBERS AND KARYOTYPE OF XANTHIUM STRUMARIUML[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1985, 3(4): 433-437.
    [10]Pu Fushen, Lin Shenghua, Song Wenqin, Chen Ruiyang, Li Xiulan. STUDIES ON KARYOTYPES OF PYRUS IN CHINA(1)[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1985, 3(4): 381-387.

Catalog

    Article views (2145) PDF downloads (1744) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return