Advance Search
XU You-Kai, LIU Hong-Mao, XIAO Chun-Fen, WU Zhao-Lu, DAO Xiang-Sheng, CAI Chuan-Tao. The Nutrient Contents of Six Fig Species and Its Evaluation as Woody Vegetables[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2005, 23(1): 85-90.
Citation: XU You-Kai, LIU Hong-Mao, XIAO Chun-Fen, WU Zhao-Lu, DAO Xiang-Sheng, CAI Chuan-Tao. The Nutrient Contents of Six Fig Species and Its Evaluation as Woody Vegetables[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2005, 23(1): 85-90.

The Nutrient Contents of Six Fig Species and Its Evaluation as Woody Vegetables

More Information
  • Received Date: May 13, 2004
  • Revised Date: July 10, 2004
  • Published Date: February 27, 2005
  • Fig trees (Ficus spp.)are the keystone species in tropical rainforest in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China. Some species of fig trees are important vegetable resources in the area. The contents of vitamin, mineral element and trace element, protein and amino acids of tender leaves and branches of six species of fig trees used as wild vegetables by indigene people are reported. The contents of vitamin E in six fig species are higher than that of Toona sinensis, a common woody vegetable consumed by Chinese. The contents of riboflavin in five are higher than that of T. sinensis. The content of thiamin of Ficus vasculosa reaches 29.48 mg ·kg-1 in dry weight. The contents of mineral and trace elements in six are higher than that of T. sinensis. The contents of calcium in five are 0.31%-1.19% in dry weight. The content of selenium of F. auriculata is 0.838 mg·kg-1 in dry weight, which is rich in selenium. The contents of protein in six species are 23.21%27.78% in dry weight, which is higher than that of T.sinensis (21.33%). The scores of ratio coefficient(SRC)of amino acid in six species in accord with WHO/FAO reference model of essential amino acid are 69.1695.98, the SRC in five are higher than 80, SRC of four species higher than that of T.sinensis. The quality of six fig trees as woody vegetable is far superior to that of T. sinensis.
  • Related Articles

    [1]Zhang Jie-Yu, Zhang Zi-Qi, Zhou Wei, Sun Wen-Guang, Li Zhi-Min. Karyotype of five Astragalus species from the alpine subnival belt in the Hengduan Mountains[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2023, 41(1): 63-69. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.22097
    [2]Yang Li-Ping, Fu Yong-Yao, Fan Jun-Hao, Huang Yu. Morphological characteristics and karyotype analysis of three local varieties of Lilium brownii var. viridulum[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2019, 37(5): 559-568. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2019.50559
    [3]GAO He-Qiong, ZHUANG Nan-Sheng, WANG Ying, QIU Hai-Yan. Karyotype Analysis of Two Varieties in Hevea brasiliensis[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2009, 27(5): 537-540.
    [4]ZHANG Lan, ZHANG Bin-Bin, WANG Hong-Guo. The Karyotype Analysis of Fraxinus velutina[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2007, 25(5): 513-514.
    [5]ZHANG Bin-Bin, ZHANG Lan. The Karyotype Analysis of Albizzia julibrissin[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2007, 25(2): 203-204.
    [6]DUAN Yong-Hong, LI Su-Qing, NIU Xi-Wu, SUN Yi. Karyotype Analysis of Four Species in Caragana Fabr.[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2006, 24(5): 413-417.
    [7]Chen Chengbin, Li Xiulan, Sun Chengren, Song Wenqin, Chen Ruiyang. STUDIES ON THE KARYOTYPE OF 9 SPECIES OF 5 GENERA OF LAURACEAE IN CHINA[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1998, 16(3): 219-222.
    [8]Cheng Lin, Zhang Yiaojia. CHROMOSOME NUMBER AND KARYOTYPE OF EREMURUS CHINENSIS FEDTSCH.[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1993, 11(3): 281-282.
    [9]Li Sifeng, Yu Zhaoying, Zhou Junyan. KARYOTYPE ANALYSIS OF PAEONIA DELAVAYI VAR. LUTEA[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1989, 7(2): 107-111.
    [10]Chen Ruiyang, Song Wenqin, An Zhuping. THE KARYOTYPE ANALYSIS AND ORIGIN OF CHROMOSOME 4A AND GENOMES B AND G OF WHEAT GENERA[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1985, 3(4): 303-312.

Catalog

    Article views (3443) PDF downloads (1899) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return