Advance Search
JIN Zhi-Fei, YANG Jia-Quan, CHEN Hong, AN Hua-Ming. Analysis of Sweet and Sour Flavor in Eight Local Peach Cultivars from Guizhou and Evaluation of their Flavor Quality[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2015, 33(1): 90-97. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2015.10090
Citation: JIN Zhi-Fei, YANG Jia-Quan, CHEN Hong, AN Hua-Ming. Analysis of Sweet and Sour Flavor in Eight Local Peach Cultivars from Guizhou and Evaluation of their Flavor Quality[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2015, 33(1): 90-97. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2015.10090

Analysis of Sweet and Sour Flavor in Eight Local Peach Cultivars from Guizhou and Evaluation of their Flavor Quality

More Information
  • Received Date: June 02, 2014
  • Revised Date: July 16, 2014
  • Available Online: October 31, 2022
  • Published Date: February 27, 2015
  • The main peach cultivar of ‘Yanhong’ was used as a control, soluble sugar and organic acid content in eight local peach cultivars from Guizhou Province were measured by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The indexes were then analyzed to evaluate the quality of their sweet-sour flavor. Results showed that (1) soluble sugars in the flesh of the eight local peaches included sucrose, glucose, fructose and sorbitol. The content of sucrose was the highest (mean content 55.62 mg/g), accounting for 71.30% of total sugar, but the coefficient of the cultivars was only 17.92%; Except for ‘Mi’, the glucose and fructose contents in the seven other peaches were similar, and the ratios of fructose to glucose in ‘Mi’ were 1.21. (2) Organic acid in the flesh of the eight local peaches included malic acid, citric acid, quinic and shikimic acid. The content of malic acid was the highest, accounting for 60.61% of total acid, although the content of quinic acid was highest in ‘Baihua’. (3) The soluble sugar and organic acid content data were processed by principal component analysis (PCA), which showed that the load coefficients of malic acid and sorbitol were 0.910 and 0.897, respectively. They were the major influencing factors on the flavor of sour-sweet in the peaches, and also played an important role in improving the sour-sweet flavor quality. The fruit flavor of ‘Huangla’ was sweet, ‘Xie’, ‘Qing’, ‘Zhenyuan’ and ‘Hongfeng’ were sweet and sour, and ‘Baihua’, ‘Xi’ and ‘Mi’ were sour.
  • [1]
    束怀瑞. 果树栽培生理学[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社, 1993: 178-180.
    [2]
    陆新华, 孙德权, 吴青松, 刘胜辉, 张秀梅, 孙光明. 不同类群菠萝种质果实糖酸组分含量分析[J]. 果树学报, 2013, 30(3): 444-448.
    [3]
    牛景, 赵剑波, 吴本宏, 李绍华, 刘国杰, 姜全. 不同来源桃种质果实糖酸组分含量特点的研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2006, 33(1): 6-11.
    [4]
    赵剑波, 姜全, 郭继英, 陈青华, 李绍华. 桃不同种质资源成熟果实葡萄糖、果糖含量比例研究[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2008, 13(2): 30-34.
    [5]
    赵剑波, 梁振昌, 杨君, 姜全, 吴本宏, 李绍华. 三个类型桃及其杂种后代糖酸含量的差异[J]. 园艺学报, 2009, 36(1): 93-98.
    [6]
    Selli R, Sansavini S. Sugar, acid and pectin content in relation to ripening and quality of peach and nectarine fruits[J]. Acta Horticul, 1995(379): 345-358.
    [7]
    Borsani J, Budde CO, Porrini L, Lauxmann MA, Lombardo VA, Murray R, Andreo CS, Drincovich MF, Lara MV. Carbon metabolism of peach fruit after harvest: changes in enzymes involved in organic acid and sugar level modifications[J]. J Exp Bot, 2009, 60(6): 1823-1837.
    [8]
    姜凤超, 王玉柱, 孙浩元, 杨丽, 张俊环, 马履一. 桃果实不同发育时期细胞内糖酸分布对甜酸风味的影响[J]. 植物科学学报, 2014, 32(3): 265-272.
    [9]
    赵剑波, 姜全, 郭继英, 陈青华, 李绍华. 桃果实风味品质指标测定与品种筛选[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2007(6): 165-167.
    [10]
    杨成华, 金小麒, 安和平, 朱世玲. 贵州冬桃初步调查研究[J]. 贵州林业科技, 1995, 23(3): 37-43.
    [11]
    罗福贤, 孙旭绍. 黔南山区果树种质资源考察报告[J]. 贵州农业科学, 1995, 23: 47-53.
    [12]
    樊卫国, 朱维藩, 范恩普, 向显衡, 康杏媛, 刘进平, 斑小重. 贵州野生果树种质资源的调查研究[J]. 贵州大学学报:农业与生物科学版, 2002, 21(1): 32-38.
    [13]
    陈红, 杨家全, 杨鑫. 贵州地方桃品种的形态特征及品质分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2013, 26(3): 1169-1174.
    [14]
    杨鑫, 杨家全, 陈红, 廖安红. 贵州野生毛桃果核性状的遗传多样性分析[J]. 西北植物学报, 2013, 33(11): 2225-2231.
    [15]
    张丽丽, 刘威生, 刘有春, 刘宁, 张玉萍. 高效液相色谱法测定5个杏品种的糖和酸[J]. 果树学报, 2010, 27(1): 119-123.
    [16]
    梁俊, 郭燕, 刘玉莲, 李敏敏, 赵政阳. 不同品种苹果果实中糖酸组成与含量分析[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版, 2011, 39(10): 163-170.
    [17]
    刘有春, 陶承光, 魏永祥, 刘成, 王兴东, 刘威生, 杨艳敏. 越橘果实糖酸含量和不同发育阶段的变化及其与叶片中可溶性糖含量的相关关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(19): 4110-4118.
    [18]
    Wu B, Quilot B, Kervella J, Génard M, Li S. Analysis of genotypic variation of sugar and acid contents in peaches and nectarines through the principle component analysis[J]. Euphytica, 2003, 132(3): 375-384.
    [19]
    Moriguchi T, Ishizawa Y, Sanada T. Differences in sugar composition in Prunus persica fruit and the classification by the principal component analysis[J]. J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci, 1990, 59(2): 307-312.
    [20]
    Bianco RL, Rieger M, Sung SS. Carbohydrate metabolism of vegetative and reproductive sinks in the late-maturing peach cultivar ‘Encore’[J]. Tree Physiol, 1999, 19(2): 103-109.
    [21]
    沈志军, 马瑞娟, 俞明亮, 蔡志翔, 徐建兰. 油蟠桃组合遗传连锁图谱构建及糖酸性状QTLs分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2010, 37(11): 1735-1744.
    [22]
    Versari A, Castellari M, Parpinello GP, Riponi C, Galsssi S. Characterisation of peach juices obtained from cultivars Redhaven, Suncrest and Maria Marta grown in Italy[J]. Food Chem, 2002, 76(2): 181-185.
    [23]
    刘金义, 崔海荣, 王龙, 王新卫, 杨健, 章镇, 李秀根, 乔玉山. 梨果实酸/低酸性状的SSR分析[J]. 果树学报, 2011, 28(3): 389-393.
    [24]
    刘志, 伊凯, 王冬梅, 杨巍, 杨锋, 张景娥. 富士杂交后代果实内在品质性状的遗传[J]. 果树学报, 2004, 21(2): 95-102.
    [25]
    周瑞, 束怀瑞. 高等植物中的山梨醇及其代谢[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 1993, 29(5): 384-390.
  • Related Articles

    [1]Yin Li, Zhang Yanbo, Zheng Jinhong, Cheng Gang, Li Zhengyuan, Chen Guilin. Differential analysis of feature markers of Balanophora involucrata Hook. f. by HPLC-MS/MS fingerprint pattern recognition coupled with chemometrics[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2024, 42(4): 499-508. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.23285
    [2]Chen Xu-Fei, Zhang Ying-Xue, Huang Xian-Yan, Wang Quan-Xi, Cao Jian-Guo, Wang You-Fang. Composition and content analysis of anthocyanidins and proanthocyanidins in ferns[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2020, 38(6): 820-830. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2020.60820
    [3]LIANG Jia-Wen, LIU Ai-Jie, MA Bing-Xin, WANG You-Wei. Simultaneous Determination of Six Flavonoid Compounds in Lotus Leaves by High Performance Liquid Chromatography[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2015, 33(6): 861-866. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2015.60861
    [4]LIU Xian-Qing, ZHANG Hong-Yan. Determination of Flavonoids from Navel Orange (Citrus sinensis) Fruits by HPLC-Q-TOF/MS[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2014, 32(6): 638-644. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2014.60638
    [5]YANG Xue-Fang, HUANG Wei, DING Jian-Qing. Determination of Puerarin, Daidzin and Daidzein in Roots and Leaves of Pueraria lobata (Wild) Ohwi from United States by RP-HPLC[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2013, 31(4): 391-397. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1142.2013.40391
    [6]LI Jing, BAI Zhi-Chuan, LIU Yang. Study on HPLC Finger Print of Chinese Quince[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2011, 29(2): 238-242.
    [7]LI Miao, LOU Yi-Ceng, YANG Han, HU Jia-Xing, SU Feng-Ping. Study on the Fingerprint Chromatogram of the Compound Giant Knotweed Rhizome by High Performance Liquid Chromatography[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2009, 27(4): 446-450.
    [8]BAI Jie, WANG Dong-Mei, YANG De-Po. Analysis of the Chemical Constituents of Hypericum hubeiense by HPLC/DAD/ESI-MS[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2008, 26(1): 87-90.
    [9]YU Xing, GAO Li-Ping, XIA Tao, HU Ying-Hui, TAN Hua-Rong. HPLC Analysis of Resveratrol and Piceid during the Development of Grape Berries[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2007, 25(1): 84-88.
    [10]Yuan Xiao, Lu Dayan, Wang Guoliang, Ye Wanchen. SEPARATION, IDENTIFICATION AND QUANTITATIVE DETERMINATION OF CELASTROL FROM THE ROOT BARK OF CELASTRUS HOOKERI[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1992, 10(4): 359-362.

Catalog

    Article views (1255) PDF downloads (1450) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return