Advance Search
LONG Hai-Yan, GU Xiao-Ping, YUAN Na, YUE Jin-Jun, LOU Chong. Microstructure and Light-response Parameters of Flowering Bamboo (Phyllostachys iridescens) Blades[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2014, 32(3): 273-278. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1142.2014.30273
Citation: LONG Hai-Yan, GU Xiao-Ping, YUAN Na, YUE Jin-Jun, LOU Chong. Microstructure and Light-response Parameters of Flowering Bamboo (Phyllostachys iridescens) Blades[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2014, 32(3): 273-278. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1142.2014.30273

Microstructure and Light-response Parameters of Flowering Bamboo (Phyllostachys iridescens) Blades

More Information
  • Received Date: August 15, 2013
  • Revised Date: November 07, 2013
  • Available Online: November 01, 2022
  • Published Date: June 29, 2014
  • To study the physiological function changes during bamboo flowering, and explore the methods of rejuvenation after flowering, we selected different Phyllostachys iridescens non-flowering bamboo blades, heteromorphic blades and normal blades from flowering bamboo stands, and observed their anatomical structures and photosynthetic parameters. Results showed that during the phase change from vegetative to reproductive growth, the blades of flowering bamboo appeared smaller and thinner and the distance between adjacent vascular bundles tended to increase, while the vascular bundle transverse area and stomatal density decreased. The overall thickness, upper epidermis thickness, vascular bundle transverse area and stomatal density of the heteromorphic blades were 71.59%, 87.40%, 77.79% and 73.56% that of the non-flowering bamboo blades, respectively, while the distances between adjacent vascular bundles were 19.34% larger than that of non-flowering bamboo blades, leading to reductions in photosynthesis and transpiration of flowering bamboo blades. Light-response parameters such as the light saturation point, apparent quantum yield, and maximum photosynthetic rates of heteromorphic blades were 67%, 40.5% and 8.27% that of non-flowering blades, respectively, 900, 0.015 and 1.22 μmol·m-2·s-1, and the light compensation point of the heteromorphic blades (85.11 μmol·m-2·s-1) was 208.5% higher than that of non-flowering blades. However, the light-response parameters of normal blades of flowering bamboo were somewhere in between. The weakened leaf structure and function alienation exacerbated by the flowering bamboo eventually led to perennial bamboos, which could not grow normally after flowering.
  • [1]
    Keeley JE,Bond WJ.Mast flowering and semelparity in bamboos:the bamboo fire cycle hypo-thesis[J].Am Nat,1999,154(3):383-391.
    [2]
    张春霞,谢寅峰,丁雨龙.福建茶杆竹开花结实期间的叶片衰老[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2003,27(2):59-61.
    [3]
    柴振林.雷竹花期激素和营养动态及其成花机理研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2005.
    [4]
    邱尔发,郑郁善,洪伟,陈卓梅,尤志达,陈开盛,陈礼光.开花和未开花山地麻竹叶片性状比较[J].福建林学院学报,2002,22(2):105-108.
    [5]
    高培军,郑郁善,林镇斌,邱黎苏,陈礼光.绿竹开花生理生化特性研究[J].竹子研究汇刊,2002,21(4):70-75.
    [6]
    Lin X,Chow T,Chen H.Understanding bamboo flowering based on large-scale analysis of expressed sequence tags [J].Genet Mol Res,2010,9(2):1085-1093.
    [7]
    Lin EP,Peng HZ,Jin QY.Identification and characterization of two Bamboo (Phyllostachys praecox) AP1/SQUA-like MADS-box genes during floral transition[J].Planta,2009,231(1):109-120.
    [8]
    Zhang XM,Zhao L,Larson-Rabin Z.De novo sequencing and characterization of the floral transcriptome of Dendrocalamus latiflorus (Poaceae:Bambusoideae)[J].PloS One,2012,7(8):e42082.
    [9]
    郑国昌,谷祝平.生物显微技术[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1978.
    [10]
    师长海,李玉欣,董宝娣,乔云周,刘梦雨.禾本科植物叶片表皮气孔观察的样品制备方法改良[J].植物生理学通讯,2010(4):395-398.
    [11]
    高照全,冯社章,李天红,张显川.苹果树冠不同部位叶片结构、内含物和模拟光合能力的比较[J].中国生态农业学报,2010,18(6):1245-1250.
    [12]
    尹秀玲,温静,刘欣,杜立文.蔷薇科12属代表植物叶片气孔密度研究[J].北方果树,2008(1):4-6.
    [13]
    吕晋慧,王玄,冯雁梦,李艳峰,赵红霞,王媛.遮荫对金莲花光合特性和叶片解剖特征的影响[J].生态学报,2012,32(19):6033-6043.
    [14]
    钟海民,杨福囤,沈振西.矮嵩草草甸主要植物气孔分布及开闭规律与蒸腾强度的关系[J].植物生态学与地植物学学报,1991,15(1):66-70.
    [15]
    Molisch H.The longevity of plants [M].New York:Published by the Translator,1938.
    [16]
    谢海平.竹类植物叶片衰老机理研究[D].南京:南京林业大学,2004.
  • Related Articles

    [1]FAN Guo-Lan, LI Wei. Response of Nutrient Accumulation Characteristics and Nutrient Strategy of Myriophyllum spicatum L. under Different Eutrophication Conditions[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2005, 23(3): 267-271.
    [2]LIU Tong, LI Xue-Yu, XIANG Qi-Bo, REN Li-Tong, PAN Zhi-Bin. Study on Variation and Covariation Pattern of Seedling Nutrient Concentrations within and between Populations of Arabidopsis pumila[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2004, 22(3): 251-258.
    [3]ZHANG Yi-Ping, CHEN Xue-Feng, XIONG Jian-Hua, ZHU Ying-Guo. Differential Display of Gene Expression in Hybrid Rice Honglianyou-6 and Its Parental Three-line Seedling Leaves in Different Developmental Stages[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2003, 21(1): 27-30.
    [4]Li Zhi'an, Wang Bosun, Lin Yongbiao, Zeng Youte. A REVIEW OF STUDY ON NUTRIENT RESORPTION OF PLANT[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2000, 18(3): 229-236.
    [5]Chen Xiaoyong, Song Yongchang. ANALYSIS OF PARENTAGE FOR NATURALLY ESTAB LISHED SEEDLINGS OF CYCLOBALANOPSIS GLAUCA[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2000, 18(3): 174-180.
    [6]Liao Haimin, Gou Guangqian, Ye Nenggan. A STUDY ON SEEDLING MORPHOLOGY AND ANATOMY AND SYSTEMATIC POSITION OF TRIGONOBALANUS DOICHANGENSIS FORMAN[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1998, 16(3): 223-226.
    [7]Liang Shichu. MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTER AND BIOMASS OF KANDELIA CANDEL SEEDLINGS[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1997, 15(2): 108-112.
    [8]Shen Yinwu, Huang Zebo, Zhu Yunzhi, Wang Qianlin. THE ANALYSIS OF NUTRIENT COMPOSITION OF ANABAENA POWDER[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1994, 12(1): 61-64.
    [9]Ding Zhaohua, Yang Guifang, Yu Bing. A STUDY ON THE NUTRIENT FILM TECHNIQUE OF TOMATOES AND CUCUMBERS[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1989, 7(3): 285-292.
    [10]Ding Zhaohua. NUTRIENT FILM TECHNIQUE[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1986, 4(3): 303-309.

Catalog

    Article views (1127) PDF downloads (1654) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return