Advance Search
DU Dan, LIU Run-Ze, HUANG San-Xiang, QU Hong, XING Shao-Hua, WANG Qing-Chun. Interspecific Association among Dominant Species in Acanthopanax senticosus Communities in Beijing, China[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2015, 33(6): 749-756. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2015.60749
Citation: DU Dan, LIU Run-Ze, HUANG San-Xiang, QU Hong, XING Shao-Hua, WANG Qing-Chun. Interspecific Association among Dominant Species in Acanthopanax senticosus Communities in Beijing, China[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2015, 33(6): 749-756. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2015.60749

Interspecific Association among Dominant Species in Acanthopanax senticosus Communities in Beijing, China

More Information
  • Received Date: May 19, 2015
  • Published Date: December 27, 2015
  • To clarify the species composition and interspecific association of Acanthopanax senticosus communities in Beijing, we carried out a series of typical sampling investigations. Based on the 2 × 2 contingency table, we used variance ratio (VR), χ2-test, Pearson's correlation and Spearman's rank correlation to analyze the interspecific association among 27 dominant species in A. senticosus communities. Results showed that 27 dominant species were significantly positively correlated, indicating a relatively stable succession status in the communities. The χ2-test, Pearson's correlation and Spearman's rank correlation analyses among the 351 species-pairs of the 27 dominant species showed that 191, 112 and 170 species-pairs were positively correlated, 160, 239 and 181 species-pairs were negatively correlated, and the positive and negative ratios were 1.19, 0.47 and 0.94, respectively. According to the species adaptations to the environment and the leading ecological factors, in combination with principal components analysis, the 27 dominant species were divided into four ecological species groups. The results showed high interspecific association among the A. senticosus communities. The communities also showed relative stability in species composition and development of community structure.
  • [1]
    林永慧, 何兴兵, 胡文勇, 田启建, 何平. 濒危植物缙云卫矛群落种间联结分析[J]. 植物科学学报, 2011, 29(1): 58-63.
    [2]
    张桂萍, 张峰, 茹文明. 旅游干扰对历山亚高山草甸优势种群种间相关性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2005, 25(11): 2868-2874.
    [3]
    杨兆静, 张钦弟, 李豪. 山西五鹿山自然保护区暴马丁香群落木本植物种间联结性分析[J]. 植物科学学报, 2013,31(1): 42-48.
    [4]
    王慧敏, 庞春花. 汾河流域中下游湿地植被优势种种间关联性分析[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 31(10): 2507-2512.
    [5]
    北京师范大学生物系. 北京植物志[M]. 北京:北京出版社, 1992: 633-634.
    [6]
    张海军. 刺五加就地快繁技术[J]. 特种经济动植物, 2004(3): 24.
    [7]
    张玉芹, 宋加录. 刺五加的栽培技术[J]. 中国野生植物资源, 2004, 23 (5): 57-58.
    [8]
    祝宁, 臧润国. 刺五加种群生态学的研究Ⅰ. 刺五加的种群结构[J]. 应用生态学报, 1993, 4(2): 113-119.
    [9]
    韩忠明, 马书民, 李晓璐, 韩梅, 杨利民. 刺五加种群结构的研究[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2009, 31(2) : 170-173.
    [10]
    韩忠明, 韩梅, 吴劲松, 杨利民. 刺五加种群更新机理的初步研究[J]. 吉林农业大学学报,2006, 28(4): 390-392.
    [11]
    臧润国. 天然次生林群落中刺五加种群生态学的研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 1990.
    [12]
    李守先. 北京松山自然保护区和百花山自然保护区(北京博物馆年鉴)[M]. 北京: 北京燕山出版社, 1991:703-704.
    [13]
    邢韶华, 林大影, 肖雁青, 雷霆, 张文林, 崔国发. 北京雾灵山自然保护区胡桃楸群落结构[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 2006, 23(3): 290-296.
    [14]
    李丽平, 崔国发. 北京雾灵山自然保护区植物数量评价[J]. 林业调查规划, 2005(2): 45-49.
    [15]
    Schluter D. A variance test for detecting species associations with some example applications[J]. Ecology, 1984,65(3): 998-1005.
    [16]
    王乃江, 张文辉, 陆元昌, 范少辉, 王勇. 陕西子午岭森林植物群落种间联结性[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(1): 67-78.
    [17]
    杨晓东, 傅德平, 袁月, 杨军, 吕光辉. 新疆艾比湖湿地自然保护区主要植物的种间关系[J]. 干旱区研究, 2010, 27(2): 249-256.
    [18]
    王伯荪, 彭少麟. 南亚热带常绿阔叶林种间联结测定技术研究 Ⅰ. 种间联结测式的探讨与修正[J]. 植物生态学与地植物学丛刊, 1985, 9(4): 274-285.
    [19]
    李帅锋, 刘万德, 苏建荣, 郎学东, 张志钧. 滇西北云南红豆杉群落物种生态位与种间联结[J]. 植物科学学报, 2012,30(6): 568-576.
    [20]
    张金屯. 数量生态学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004.
    [21]
    简敏菲, 刘琪景, 朱笃, 游海. 九连山常绿阔叶林乔木优势种群的种间关联分析[J]. 植物生态学报,2009,3(4): 672-680.
    [22]
    Legendre L, Legendre P. Numerical Ecology[M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, 1983.
    [23]
    胡贝娟,张钦弟,张玲,毕润成. 山西太岳山连翘群落优势种种间关系[J]. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(4): 845-851.
    [24]
    杜荣赛. 生物统计学[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 1999.
    [25]
    汲文宪, 陈丽华, 郭峰, 卞西陈, 王鹏. 北沟林场天然次生林主要乔木树种种间关系分析[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2012,40(9): 10-14.
    [26]
    李建民, 谢芳, 陈存及, 张思玉, 肖日红, 赵大洲. 光皮桦天然林群落优势种群的种间联结性研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 2001, 12(2): 168-170.
    [27]
    娄彦景, 赵魁义. 三江平原最近30年毛苔草群落演替的种间关联性分析[J]. 生态学杂志, 2008, 27(4): 509-513.
    [28]
    高永恒,曾晓阳,周国英,王根绪. 长江源区高寒湿地植物群落主要种群种间关系分析[J]. 湿地科学, 2011, 9(1): 1-7.
    [29]
    李刚, 朱志红, 王孝安, 郭华. 子午岭乔木群落演替过程中种间联结性分析[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2008, 36(11): 25-28.
    [30]
    张秀高. 孩儿参的栽培技术[J]. 特产研究, 1993(2): 61.
  • Related Articles

    [1]Liu Fen-Fen, Xu Gang-Biao, Li Tian-Tian, Luo Chang-Sha. Characterization and development of SSR markers from transcriptome sequence of Bretschneidera sinensis Hemsl.[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2021, 39(3): 288-296. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2021.30288
    [2]MI Qi, LONG Zhi-Cheng, MUCHUKU John Kamau, CHEN Jin-Ming, WANG Qing-Feng. Development of SSR Markers in Giant Lobelia (Lobelia deckenii) Based on Next-generation High-throughput Sequencing[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2015, 33(6): 847-854. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2015.60847
    [3]LI Lei, BAO Origil, WANG Bin-Qi, GE Tai-Ming. Using Modified FIASCO Protocol to Isolate Polymorphic Microsatellite Loci in Chinese Brake Fern (Pteris vittata L.):an Arsenic-Hyperaccumulating Plant[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2014, 32(4): 413-420. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1142.2014.40413
    [4]GUO Hong-Yuan, JIA Ju-Qing, ZHANG Xian-Hong, LA Shi-Xiao, YANG Wu-De. Development and Application of EST-SSR Markers in Oat[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2014, 32(3): 240-250. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1142.2014.30240
    [5]QIU Dao-Shou, ZHENG Xi-Long, CAI Shi-Ke, ZHENG Jin-Rong, LUO Huan-Ming, ZHANG Lei, DENG Rui-Yun, LI Wu, LIU Xiao-Jin. Development and Transfer Analysis of SSR in Dendrobium[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2013, 31(5): 500-509. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1142.2013.50500
    [6]ZHOU A-Tao, YUE Liang-Liang, LI Min, LIU Di-Qiu, DING Yuan-Ming. Intra-genomic Polymorphism in the nrDNA ITS Sequence of Camellia reticulata[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2013, 31(1): 1-10. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1142.2013.10001
    [7]CAI Yu, ZHAO Hua, CHEN Xiao-Dong, WU Guo-Jiang, PENG Jun-Hua. SSR-based Genetic Diversity of Jatropha curcas Germplasm in China[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2011, 29(1): 74-80.
    [8]LI Yan-Kun, TAO Ai-Fen, QI Jian-Min, ZHOU Dong-Xin, WANG Tao, ZHANG Guang-Qing, WEI Cheng-Lin, LAN Tao, CHEN Shun-Hui. Polymorphic Analysis of RAPD with Double Primers and a Single Primer in Tobacco[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2010, 28(3): 257-262. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1142.2010.30257
    [9]ZHANG Jun-E, LI Fen, SUN Meng-Xiang. Analysis of EST-SSR Loci in Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2007, 25(5): 427-431.
    [10]Wang Weijian, Wang Xiangming. GENETIC STUDIES ON THE WILD RICE (ORYZA)——Ⅱ、The polymorphism of peroxidase isozymes of common wild rice[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1988, 6(4): 375-381.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(11)

    1. 张雨晨,陈绪辉,李珂佳,刘宝,吴宇飞,郑世群. 珍稀植物江南油杉群落多样性和生态位特征分析. 西北林学院学报. 2025(02): 122-131 .
    2. 唐双龙,陈时鑫,王煜,马丹炜,杨世辉,聂申明,扎西泽里,田正友. 中国特有种大理白前对高寒环境的形态适应特征. 植物研究. 2024(03): 389-399 .
    3. 林碧华,陈绪辉,罗敏贤,陈泽平,张雨晨,刘宝,刘益鹏,郑世群. 珍稀濒危植物江南油杉群落区系与种群动态分析. 西北林学院学报. 2024(04): 71-78 .
    4. 陈绪辉,叶宝鉴,潘标志,林碧华,罗敏贤,肖丽芳,刘宝,何宗明,郑世群. 珍稀濒危植物江南油杉群落乔木层主要树种种间关联性分析. 热带亚热带植物学报. 2023(01): 21-30 .
    5. 赵欣,卢海峰,钱程,胡雅飞,刘大林,王琳,李新娥. 紫花苜蓿叶面积和叶解剖结构对盐胁迫的响应. 江苏农业科学. 2023(19): 145-152 .
    6. 张培,庞圣江,刘士玲,谌红辉,段润梅,曾琪瑶. 遮荫对江南油杉幼苗生长和叶绿素荧光参数的影响. 西北植物学报. 2023(10): 1716-1722 .
    7. 刘高源,高欣欣,郭家文. 不同甘蔗品种蔗茎纤维组分差异分析. 中国糖料. 2022(01): 43-47 .
    8. 蒋燚,刘菲,刘雄盛,姜英,黄荣林,王勇,韦铄星,何应会. 珍贵乡土树种江南油杉种质资源保存评价及壮苗繁育体系构建技术. 广西林业科学. 2022(01): 1-9 .
    9. 尹国平,刘雄盛,蒋燚,王勇,杨继生,肖玉菲,黄荣林,姜英. 枫香变红过程中叶片组织结构、光合特性及色素含量变化研究. 广西植物. 2022(07): 1213-1221 .
    10. 罗广令,廖海民,胡国雄. 唇形科苣叶鼠尾草和岩生鼠尾草营养器官的比较解剖结构及其生态适应性. 植物科学学报. 2022(05): 598-609 . 本站查看
    11. 姜英,刘菲,刘雄盛,李娟,何应会,黄荣林,蒋燚. 江南油杉幼苗接种AMF的菌根浸染及依赖性分析. 广西林业科学. 2021(01): 44-48 .

    Other cited types(4)

Catalog

    Article views (1222) PDF downloads (1311) Cited by(15)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return