Advance Search
Shi Yinping, Wang Qiangsheng, Jia Yuanshu, Li Xingyi. CYTOLOGY OF ENDOSPERM-TRIPLOID IN ZIZYPHUS SATIVA[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1985, 3(4): 389-396.
Citation: Shi Yinping, Wang Qiangsheng, Jia Yuanshu, Li Xingyi. CYTOLOGY OF ENDOSPERM-TRIPLOID IN ZIZYPHUS SATIVA[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1985, 3(4): 389-396.

CYTOLOGY OF ENDOSPERM-TRIPLOID IN ZIZYPHUS SATIVA

More Information
  • Received Date: December 31, 1899
  • Revised Date: December 31, 1899
  • Published Date: December 21, 1985
  • Chromosome numbers of 5 Zizyphus species are known. There is no odd ploidy, Zizyphus sativa Gaertn. is diploid, and no spontaneous polyploid type has been found. The triploid plants were first induced from endosperm of Z. sativa in 1978. The endosperm-triploid began to blossom. and bear fruits in 1983. Its cytological behavior is as follows:1. The endosperm-diploidChromosome number of diploid is 2n = 24. Meiotic behavior is regular. At prophase Ⅰ and metaphase Ⅰ, 12 bivalents were observed. At the end of meiosis, normal tetrads occur, and the microspores are equal in size. The pollen grains are normal tricolporate ones.2. The endosperm-triploidChromosome number of triploid is 2n = 36. Its microsporocytes are larger than diploid. Meiotic behavior is very irregular. At prophase Ⅰ and metaphase Ⅰ, there are variable numbers of univalents, bivalents and multivalents, with the numbers of chromosome groups varying from 14 to 20. At anaphase Ⅰ, Ⅱ, disjunction is irregular, resulting in unequal chromosome numbers, lagging chromosomes, multipolar division and micronuclei. At the end of meiosis, some microsporocytes give rise to monads, diads, unequal tetrads, pentads and ha xads, and the microspores are not uniform in size. The normal pollen grains are larger than diploid, and are tricolporate or tetracolporate. Some small and aborted pollen grains were found.
  • Related Articles

    [1]BIAN Chun-Xiang, LI Jin-Tao, PENG Zheng-Song, RUAN Qi-Ping. Sequence Analysis and Function Predication of Cyt C from Conocephalum conicum(L.)Dum.[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2009, 27(4): 432-436.
    [2]SHENG Mao-Yin, CHEN Qing-Fu. Giemsa C-banding Analysis in Eight Species of Genus Epimedium(Berberidaceae)[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2008, 26(5): 433-436.
    [3]DING Kai-Yu, WANG Wei, SUN Jing-Xian, WANG Yue-Hua. The Chromosome Variation of Barnardia japonica Polyploid Complex Uncovered by Giemsa-C Banding[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2007, 25(5): 421-426.
    [4]She Chaowen, Song Yunchun, Liu Lihua. STUDIES ON KARYOTYPE AND G-BANDING PATTERNS IN PSOPHOCARPUS TETRAGONOLOBUS (L.) DC[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1998, 16(1): 23-26.
    [5]Zhang Jintun. A COMPARISON OF FUZZY C-MEANS ALGORITHM CLUSTERING AND TWINSPAN IN VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1994, 12(1): 11-17.
    [6]Xiong Zhiting, Chen Xinqi(Chen Singchi), Yuan Ping. STUDIES ON GIEMSA C-BANDS AND CHROMOCENTERS OF SILPHIUM PERFOLIATUM[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1993, 11(1): 1-4.
    [7]Zhang Zanping, Li Maoxue, Yuan Jiazheng. A STUDY ON Ag-NORs AND GIEMSA C BANDING OF CHROMOSOMES IN Paeonia suffruticosa[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1990, 8(2): 101-106.
    [8]Zhang Zuorong. STUDIES ON THE KARYOTYPE AND BANDING PATTERN OF TRITICUM MONOCOCCUM L.[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1985, 3(4): 465-467.
    [9]Zhu Bicai, Li Keqin, Fang Chaoping. THE KARYOTYPE AND GIEMSA C-BANDING PATTERN OF VICIA SATIVA[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1985, 3(4): 432-432.
    [10]Li Xiulan, Chen Ruiyang. THE KARYOTYPE ANALYSIS OF SETARIA ITALICA AND S. VIRIDIS[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1985, 3(4): 409-412.

Catalog

    Article views PDF downloads Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return