Advance Search
Li Wen-Ji, Gao Su-Ping, Lei Ting, Zhang Shuo, Wu Pei-Wen, Zhao Zhi-Hui. Flowering biological characteristics and pollen preservation of Plumbago auriculata[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2017, 35(6): 874-883. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2017.60874
Citation: Li Wen-Ji, Gao Su-Ping, Lei Ting, Zhang Shuo, Wu Pei-Wen, Zhao Zhi-Hui. Flowering biological characteristics and pollen preservation of Plumbago auriculata[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2017, 35(6): 874-883. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2017.60874

Flowering biological characteristics and pollen preservation of Plumbago auriculata

Funds: 

This work was supported by a grant from the Breeding Project of Sichuan Province 13th Five-Year Plan Tackle Key Problems(2016NY20038).

More Information
  • Received Date: April 27, 2017
  • Available Online: October 31, 2022
  • Published Date: December 27, 2017
  • Pollen and stigma morphologies, floral characteristics, and flowering phenologies of introduced and cultivated Plumbago auriculata Lam. in Sichuan were systematically observed, with the collection period and storage temperature of pollen also examined. Results showed:(1) There were obvious differences between pollen and stigma morphology; P (polar axis length) and E (equatorial axis length) values of S-morph pollen were significantly higher than that of L-morph pollen; the stigma of the L-morph pollen was significantly longer than that of the S-morph pollen; and the exine ornamentation and stigma stromae of the two morphs of pollen were significantly different. (2) P. auriculata had a high flowering synchrony index of 0.89, but its relative flowering intensity was at a mid-level. (3) When the two morphs of pollen were harvested during the half-flowering period, viability reached the highest levels. The L-morph pollen viability reached 85.24% ±4.22% and S-morph pollen viability reached 87.74% ±2.95%. (4) L-morph and S-morph pollen maintained better viability when stored at low temperatures after drying at a constant temperature of 25℃ for 0.5 h and 1 h, respectively. (5) Dried pollen was best stored at -86℃, and after 30 d of storage the L-morph pollen viability was 66.51% ±0.85% and S-morph pollen viability was 69.07% ±1.57%. In summary, there were significant differences in the reproductive resource allocation between the two morph plants of P. auriculata, with differences in the size, morphology, and drying time of pollen, and significantly different characteristics in the stigma. Whether these different structures participate in the self-incompatibility reaction of P. auriculata remains to be further studied. In addition, low flowering intensity can cause insect pollination difficulties, which may be an important factor in the extremely low natural seed setting rate.
  • [1]
    王意成. 蓝雪花[J]. 花木盆景(花卉园艺),2015(11):44. Wang YC. Plumbago auriculata[J]. Flower Plant & Penjing, 2015(11):44.
    [2]
    Crouch IJ, Finnie JF, Staden JV. Studies on the isolation of plumbagin from in vitro and in vivo grown Drosera species[J]. Plant Cell Tiss Org, 1990, 21(1):79-82.
    [3]
    Moumita Gangopadhyay, Saikat Dewanjee, Dipjyoti Chakraborty. Role of exogenous phytohormones on growth and plumbagin accumulation in Plumbago indica hairy roots and conservation of elite root clones via synthetic seeds[J]. Ind Crop Prod, 2011, 33(2):445-450.
    [4]
    Panichayupakaranant P, Tewtrakul S. Plumbagin production by root cultures of Plumbago rosea[J]. Electron J Biotechn, 2002, 5(3):228-232.
    [5]
    曾颖,邓燕明,姚敏元,彭健. 白花丹的药理研究及在眼科中的应用[J]. 中国药房, 1997, 8(4):161-162.

    Zeng Y, Deng YM, Yao MY, Pen J. The pharmacological strdy of plumbagin and its use in eye diseases[J]. China Pharmacy, 1997, 8(4):161-162.
    [6]
    张倩睿,梅之南,杨光忠,肖玉秀. 白花丹化学成分的研究[J]. 中药材, 2007, 30(5):558-560.

    Zhang QR, Mei ZN, Yang GZ, Xiao YX. Chemical consti-tuents from aerial parts of Plumbago zeylanica Linn.[J]. Journal of Chinese Medicinal Materials, 2007, 30(5):558-560.
    [7]
    秦鹤兰. 园林新秀蓝雪花[J]. 中国花卉园艺, 2010(24):24.

    Qin HL. A new horticulture cultivar Plumbago auriculata[J]. China Flowers & Horticulture, 2010(24):24.
    [8]
    Ferrero V, Vega CD, Stafford GI, Staden JV, Johnson SD. Heterostyly and pollinators in Plumbago auriculata (Plumbaginaceae)[J]. S Afr J Bot, 2009, 75(14):778-784.
    [9]
    Brys R, Jacquemyn H. Disruption of the distylous syndrome in Primula veris[J]. Ann Bot-London, 2015, 115(1):27-39.
    [10]
    张硕,高素萍. 蓝花丹的花部形态二态性及自交不亲和特性[J]. 广西植物,2014,34(6):747-753.

    Zhang S, Gao SP. Distyly and selfing incompatibility of Plumbago auriculata[J]. Guihaia, 2014, 34(6):747-753.
    [11]
    李小远,马玉磊,刘阳,唐婉, 潘会堂, 张启翔. 小报春不同授粉组合亲和性研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2012, 32(12):2426-2431.

    Li XY, Ma YL, Liu Y, Tang W, Pan HT, Zhang QX. Compatibility of different pollination combinations in Primula forbesii[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia, 2012, 32(12):2426-2431.
    [12]
    Pickering CM. Variation in flowering parameters within and among five species of Australian alpine Ranunculus[J]. Aust J Bot, 1995, 43(1):103-112.
    [13]
    肖宜安,何平,李晓红. 濒危植物长柄双花木开花物候与生殖特性[J]. 生态学报,2004, 24(1):14-21.

    Xiao YA, He P, Li XP. The flowering phenology and reproductive features of the endangered plant Disanthus cercidifolius var. longipes H. T. Chang (Hamamelidaceae)[J]. Acta Ecologica,2004, 24(1):14-21.
    [14]
    Chen ML. Comparative reproductive biology of Primula merrilliana Schltr. and P. cicutariifolia Pax.[J]. Plant Syst Evol, 2009, 278(1-2):23-32.
    [15]
    曹丽敏,夏念和,曹明,李湘龙. 中国无患子科的花粉形态及其系统学意义[J]. 植物科学学报, 2016, 34(6):821-833.

    Cao LM, Xia NH, Cao M, Li XL. Pollen morphology and its systematic significance in Sapindaceae from China[J]. Plant Sclence Journal, 2016, 34(6):821-833.
    [16]
    倪穗,李纪元,田敏,高捍东. 红山茶组植物花粉外壁纹饰特征及其演化关系[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2007, 31(4):16-20.

    Ni S, Li JY, Tian M, Gao HD. Pollen exine sculpture of Sect. Camellia in genus Camellia and its taxonomic significance[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Science Edition, 2007, 31(4):16-20.
    [17]
    王宇霖. 落叶果树种类学[M]. 北京:农业出版社, 1988.
    [18]
    耿兴敏,黄蓓丽,罗凤霞,吴祝华, 裘建宇. 唐菖蒲花粉低温保存效果分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2011, 25(4):7-12.

    Geng XM, Huang BL, Luo FX, Wu ZH, Qiu JY. A study on cryopreservation of Gladiolus pollens[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Science Edition,2011, 25(4):7-12.
    [19]
    王钦丽,卢龙斗,吴小琴,陈祖铿,林金星. 花粉的保存及其生活力测定[J]. 植物学通报,2002, 19(3):365-373.

    Wang QL,Lu LD,Wu XQ,Chen ZK,Lin JX. Pollen preservation and its viability test[J]. Chinses Bulletin of Botany, 2002, 19(3):365-373.
    [20]
    董易,马晓红,沈强,顾俊杰, 史益敏. 荷兰水仙花粉萌发和花粉贮藏性[J]. 上海交通大学学报:农业科学版, 2012, 30(5):24-29.

    Dong Y, Ma XH, Shen Q, Gu JJ, Shi YM. Study on pollen germination and preservation of Narcissus pseudonarcissus[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University:Agricultural Science, 2012, 30(5):24-29.
    [21]
    Bhat ZA, Dhillon WS, Shafi RHS, Rather JA. Influence of storage temperature on viability and in vitro germination capacity of pear (Pyrus spp.) pollen[J]. J Agr Sci, 2012, 4(11):128-135.
    [22]
    李要民,陈良碧. 不同温湿条件下贮藏的3种禾本科植物花粉活力变化[J].植物生理学通讯,1998, 34(1):35-37.

    Li YM, Chen LB. Vigor change of several grasses pollen stored in different temperature and humidity conditions[J]. Plant Physiology Communications, 1998, 34(1):35-37.
  • Related Articles

    [1]Yang Si-Jia, Zhao Yu-Qing, Chen Tao, Yuan Ming. Research progress on plant melatonin biosynthesis[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2021, 39(2): 211-220. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2021.20211
    [2]Wei Li, Liu Jian-Li. Overview of research on protein subcellular localization in plants[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2021, 39(1): 93-101. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2021.10093
    [3]Liu Yan-Li, Zhou Yuan, Cao Dan, Ma Lin-Long, Gong Zi-Ming, Jin Xiao-Fang. Application analysis of predictors for plant protein subcellular localization based on proteome data of Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Ktze.[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2020, 38(5): 671-677. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2020.50671
    [4]Qi Tong-Hui, Gao Meng, Yuan Yang-Yang, Li Ming-Jun, Ma Feng-Wang, Ma Bai-Quan. Cloning, expression analysis, and subcellular position of MdPH1 related to acidity in Malus domestica Borkh[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2019, 37(6): 767-774. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2019.60767
    [5]Tang Kuan-Gang, Ren Mei-Yan, Zhang Wen-Jun, Pang Xin-Yue, Xue Min, Wang Mao-Yan. Cloning and preliminary functional analysis of AmNAC6 from Ammopiptanthus mongolicus[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2018, 36(5): 705-712. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2018.50705
    [6]Zhang Hui, Zheng Jie-Xuan, Jian Shu-Guang, Xia Kuai-Fei, Zhang Mei. Isolation and functional characterization of the ASR gene from Ipomoea pes-caprae[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2018, 36(3): 402-410. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2018.30402
    [7]YANG Li-Xiang, WANG Zheng-Xun, KE De-Sen, WU Jin-Xiong. Subcellular Localization of Arabidopsis Hemoglobin 3[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2010, 28(4): 516-520.
    [8]CUI Yong-Lan, WANG Peng-Cheng. Study on Subcellular Localization of Two Expressed Proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2009, 27(2): 216-220.
    [9]ZHANG Yu-Bao, XIE Zhong-Kui, LI Tong-Xiang, WANG Ya-Jun, GUO Zhi-Hong, WANG Zhi-Li. Prokaryotic Expression of DREB1A Transcription Factor[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2007, 25(4): 326-330.
    [10]LIU Wei-Qun, SHI Yong-Chun, HU Ya-Jie, LIU Qiao-Zhen. The Tolerance to Abiotic Stresses Mediated by DREB-like Transcription Factors in Nicotiana tabacum[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2007, 25(3): 222-225.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(0)

    Other cited types(3)

Catalog

    Article views (720) PDF downloads (983) Cited by(3)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return