Advance Search
ZHANG Yong-Fu, HAN Li, HUANG He-Ping, CHEN Ze-Bin, REN Zhen, LIU Jia-Ni, PENG Sheng-Jing. Comparisons of Stem Anatomical Structures among Litchi, Longan and Longli[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2014, 32(6): 551-560. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2014.60551
Citation: ZHANG Yong-Fu, HAN Li, HUANG He-Ping, CHEN Ze-Bin, REN Zhen, LIU Jia-Ni, PENG Sheng-Jing. Comparisons of Stem Anatomical Structures among Litchi, Longan and Longli[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2014, 32(6): 551-560. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2014.60551

Comparisons of Stem Anatomical Structures among Litchi, Longan and Longli

More Information
  • Received Date: January 12, 2014
  • Available Online: October 31, 2022
  • Published Date: December 29, 2014
  • To observe similarities and differences in stem anatomical structures among litchi, longan and longli, we compared the stem transverse structures and vessel elements of 20 different materials among litchi, longan and longli by free hand section and tissue segregation procedure, respectively. The results showed that (1) The stem structure of the experimental materials from the inside to the outside was periderm, cortex, vascular tissue, pith and ray, but their structure characteristics exhibited great differences. Average pith rate of longan germplasm (26.19%) was significantly greater than that of longli (22.43%) or litchi (6.96%) germplasm, and among them the lowest pith rate was found in Litchi chinensis var. fulvosus (3.37%), followed by ‘Sanyuehong’ (14.14%), and wild longan (30.27%). In addition, the bark rate of litchi (41.93%) was significantly greater than that in longan (33.21%) and longli (29.83%). (2) Vessel density of each tested material was not obviously regular, with ‘Sanyuehong’ (93.17 No./mm2) exhibiting minimum vessel density, followed by longli (101.78 No./mm2); total vessel area/xylem area of litchi was significantly higher than that of longan and longli; the ‘Sanyuehong’ (22.13 μm) ray was significantly wider than that of the other tested materials. (3) Vessel elements mostly belonged to pitted or reticulate vessels, but did include a few ringed, spiral or scalariform vessels in the 20 accessions. Vessel diameter of ‘Sanyuehong’ (35.97 μm) was significantly higher than that of the other tested materials, followed by longli (33.90 μm), with and L. chinensis var. fulvosus (238.52 μm) significantly longer than other specimens. (4) The vessel elements of large aperture, short, end wall of small inclination (or level), no tail, pitted pattern, and simple perforation plate were evolutionary vessel element traits. In litchi germplasm, the vessel elements of ‘Sanyuehong’ were evolutionary, and L. chinensis var. fulvosus was more primitive. (5) Cluster analysis of the stem index structures found that the 20 accessions were firstly divided into two categories. The first category was Litchi germplasm resources, except ‘Sanyuehong’, and the second category included all longan germplasm resources, longli and litchi ‘Sanyuehong’. These two categories were then divided into eight groups, with each group having significant features alone. Comparison of species anatomical stem features showed that litchi was more primitive than longan, and longli was in the middle.
  • [1]
    苏伟强, 黄海滨, 陆玉英, 刘荣光. 龙荔与龙眼荔枝过氧化物酶同工酶分析及亲缘关系研究初报[J]. 广西农业科学, 1993(4): 158-159.
    [2]
    Liu CM, Mei MT. Classification of lychee cultivars with RAPD analysis[J]. Acta Horticulturae, 2005, 665: 149-159.
    [3]
    周佳. 荔枝高密度遗传图谱构建及若干重要种质的分子标记分析[D]. 广州: 华南农业大学, 2009.
    [4]
    Van Buren R, Li JG, Zee F, Zhu JH, Liu CM, Arumuganathan AK, Ming R. Longli is not a hybrid of longan and lychee as revealed by genome size analysis and trichome morphology[J]. Tropical Plant Biol, 2011, 4: 228-236.
    [5]
    喻诚鸿. 次生木质部的进化与植物系统发育的关系[J]. 植物学报, 1954, 3(2): 183-196.
    [6]
    喻诚鸿. 木材解剖在植物分类研究中的意义[J]. 植物学报, 1956, 5(4): 411-425.
    [7]
    吕静, 胡玉熹. 伯乐树茎次生木质部结构的研究[J]. 植物学报, 1994, 36(6): 459-465.
    [8]
    张新英, 高信曾. 十齿花次生木质部和次生韧皮部的解剖学研究[J]. 植物学报, 1995, 37(5): 534-538.
    [9]
    胡正海. 植物比较解剖学在中国50年的进展和展望[J]. 西北植物学报, 2003, 23(2): 244-355.
    [10]
    陈严平, 李信, 张跃华, 杨世清, 何丽莲. 甘蔗属及近缘植物茎的比较解剖研究[J]. 云南大学学报, 1998, 20: 573-576.
    [11]
    李晶, 王布云, 韩丽娟. 中国金缕梅科12属植物次生木质部的比较解剖[J]. 南开大学学报自然科学版, 2003, 36(4): 100-105.
    [12]
    汪琼, 史云云, 姚青菊, 徐增莱, 吕晔, 杭珍. 夏腊梅和美国腊梅及属间杂种'红运’营养器官解剖结构特征比较[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2011, 20(3): 62-68.
    [13]
    Roth I. Structural patterents of tropical bark[M]// Roth I ed. Handbuch der Pflanzenanatomie Ⅸ / 3 Bortraegar. Berlin: Stutlgart, 1981: 546-560.
    [14]
    Fahn A. 植物解剖学[M]. 吴树明, 刘德仪, 译. 天津: 南开大学出版社, 1990: 497.
    [15]
    陈树思. 荔枝次生木质部导管分子及穿孔板观察研究[J]. 广西植物, 2007, 27(3): 397-400.
    [16]
    郑瑞, 周方方, 林萍, 姚小华, 陆畅, 张小平. 不同油茶品种叶片横切面解剖特征及其亲缘关系分析[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2013, 22(2): 18-29.
    [17]
    赵昱, 刘占林. 5种松树针叶解剖结构的数量分析[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2010, 25(2): 19-24.
    [18]
    蔡联炳, 张同林. 根据叶解剖特征试论赖草属及其相关类群间的亲缘关系[J]. 西北植物学报, 2006, 26(3): 537-543.
    [19]
    刘霞, 彭抒昂, 郭文武. 三种柑橘实生砧木及其两种体细胞杂种根系解剖结构的比较[J]. 园艺学报, 2008, 35(9): 1249-1254.
    [20]
    李晓燕, 王林和, 李连国, 刘艳, 李巧玲, 赵灵芝. 沙棘茎的形态解剖特征与其生态适应性研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2008, 22(3): 189.
  • Related Articles

    [1]LIU Xiong-Sheng, XU Gang-Biao, LIANG Wen-Bin, XIAO Yu-Fei. Studies on Microsporogenesis and Development of Male Gametophytes in Endangered Species Glyptostrobus pensilis[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2014, 32(1): 58-66. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1142.2014.10058
    [2]ZHU Hong-Fang, HOU Rui-Xian, LI Xiao-Feng, ZHU Yu-Ying, HOU Xi-Lin. Cytological Observation of Anther Development between the Male Sterile Line and Its Maintainer Line in Non-heading Chinese Cabbage[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2011, 29(2): 183-187.
    [3]WEN Li, LIU Gai, WAN Cui-Xiang, WANG Kun, PENG Xiao-Jue, ZHU Ying-Guo. A Comparative Analysis about Two-dimensional Gel Electrophoresis of Anther Total Proteins from Honglian Cytoplasmic Male Sterile Rice during the Different Developing Stages of the Microspores[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2006, 24(4): 346-350.
    [4]FANG Shu-Gui, ZENG Xiao-Ling, ZHU Chao-Hui, LIN Bi-Ying, CHEN Wen-Hui, LIAO Xiao-Zhen. Embryogenesis of Isolated-microspore in Cabbage(Brassica oleracea var.capitata)[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2005, 23(6): 530-534.
    [5]ZHAO Jing, SUN Meng-Xiang. Influence of Exogenous Auxin on Microspore Embryogenesis in Tobacco[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2005, 23(6): 519-523.
    [6]WANG Tao-Tao, LI Han-Xia, ZHANG Ji-Hong, LU Yong-En, YE Zhi-Biao. Isolated Microspore Culture and Plant Regeneration in Purple Flowering Stalk (Brassica compestris ssp. chinensis var. pupurea Hort.)[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2004, 22(6): 569-571.
    [7]Liu LinXu, Qiusheng, Zhang Zaijun, Zhang Hengyue, Ye Xiulin, Liang Chengye. ORGANELLAR CHANGES IN MICROSPORES OF CITRULLUS VULGARIS SCHRAD[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2000, 18(4): 266-270,.
    [8]Yu Fengqun, Fu Airu, Liu Houli. THE CYTOLOGICAL OBSERVATION OF MICROSPORE EMBRYOGENESIS IN BRASSICA NAPUS[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1998, 16(3): 197-201.
    [9]Sun Mengxiang, Wang Zhaoan. A STUDY ON MICROSPORE ABORTION AND THE RELATION TO ABNORMAL WALL LAYERS IN PAULOWNIA SP.[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1991, 9(1): 16-20.
    [10]He Guofan, Lin Yuechan. RESEARCH OF THE CONTRACTION PHASES ⅠAND Ⅱ OF MICROSPORE DEVELOPMENT IN RICE[J]. Plant Science Journal, 1989, 7(1): 1-4.

Catalog

    Article views (1877) PDF downloads (4857) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return